IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polpwa/266504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Inclusive Growth and other Alternatives to Confront Authoritarian Populism

Author

Listed:
  • Getahun, Saleamlak Fentaw

Abstract

Our world has gone through myriad forms of administrative and economic ideological eras, some of which helped positively and others contributed regressively. Recently, the rise of authoritarian populism as an alternative path to mainstream democracy stems from the failure of inclusiveness in the political and economic institutions especially in the rural world. Due to extractive capitalism, nowadays, rural areas are characterized by persistent poverty, deep inequalities, marginalization and exclusion, fractured identities and loss of self-esteem, which in turn engenders a regressive politics dubbed 'authoritarian populism'. It endangers our future unless we confront it and it has gained momentum by winning national elections in some countries. Alternatively, inclusive growth that would successfully share benefits to the rural people via inclusive political and economic institutions could be able to transform the rural poor. Endorsing and supporting this option with emancipatory rural politics, therefore, saves globalization from a looming collapse and ultimately culminates the world to a new level of civilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Getahun, Saleamlak Fentaw, 2017. "Review of Inclusive Growth and other Alternatives to Confront Authoritarian Populism," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:266504
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266504/files/2017_4_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266504/files/2017_4_7.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arjan de Haan, 2014. "The Rise of Social Protection in Development: Progress, Pitfalls and Politics," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 26(3), pages 311-321, July.
    2. Ruth Hall & Thembela Kepe, 2017. "Elite capture and state neglect: new evidence on South Africa’s land reform," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(151), pages 122-130, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O. Fiona Yap, 2020. "A New Normal or Business-as-Usual? Lessons for COVID-19 from Financial Crises in East and Southeast Asia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(5), pages 1504-1534, December.
    2. Clemence Rusenga, 2019. "The Agribusiness Model in South African Land Reform? Land Use Implications for the Land Reform Beneficiaries," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(3), pages 440-461, December.
    3. Dennis Puorideme, 2023. "An Ethnographic-Discourse Analysis of the Socio-political Effects of Interaction Between Cash Transfer Programme Authorities, Caregivers and Non-beneficiaries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(3), pages 483-519, June.
    4. Donna Hornby & Adrian Nel & Samuel Chademana & Nompilo Khanyile, 2018. "A Slipping Hold? Farm Dweller Precarity in South Africa’s Changing Agrarian Economy and Climate," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Marcia Juliana d’Angelo & Janette Brunstein & Jones Madson Telles, 2021. "Becoming Family Farmers: The Contribution of the Existential Ontological Perspective to the Social Learning for Sustainability Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Scarlato, Margherita & D'Agostino, Giorgio, 2016. "The political economy of cash transfers: a comparative analysis of Latin American and sub-Saharan African experiences," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Hannah Kuper & Matthew Walsham & Flora Myamba & Simeon Mesaki & Islay Mactaggart & Morgon Banks & Karl Blanchet, 2016. "Social protection for people with disabilities in Tanzania: a mixed methods study," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 441-457, October.
    8. Jawad, Rana, 2019. "A new era for social protection analysis in LMICs? A critical social policy perspective from the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Kmoch, Laura, 2021. "Neglect paves the way for dispossession: The politics of “last frontiers” in Brazil and Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Geert De Neve & Kaveri Medappa & Rebecca Prentice, 2023. "India’s Gig Economy Workers at the Time of Covid-19: An Introduction," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 343-358, December.
    11. María Gabriela Palacio Ludeña, 2019. "Institutionalizing Segregation: Women, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Paid Employment in Southern Ecuador," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(S1), pages 245-273, December.
    12. Kaltenborn Markus, 2017. "Overcoming Extreme Poverty by Social Protection Floors – Approaches to Closing the Right to Social Security Gap," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 237-273, October.
    13. Chimhowu, Admos, 2019. "The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 897-903.
    14. Lovemore C. Gwiriri & James Bennett & Cletos Mapiye & Sara Burbi, 2021. "Emerging from Below? Understanding the Livelihood Trajectories of Smallholder Livestock Farmers in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Khumbuzile C. Mosoma & Heinrich R. Bohlmann & Sifiso M. Ntombela & Renee van Eyden, 2023. "Quantifying the Economic Effects of Land Reform Policy in South Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Working Papers 202307, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    16. Hajdu, Flora & Granlund, Stefan & Neves, David & Hochfeld, Tessa & Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin & Sandström, Emil, 2020. "Cash transfers for sustainable rural livelihoods? Examining the long-term productive effects of the Child Support Grant in South Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    17. Rachel Godfrey†Wood & Benjamin C. R. Flower, 2018. "Does Guaranteed employment promote resilience to climate change? The case of India's Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 586-604, March.
    18. Haji Athumani Msangi & Hamza Moluh Njoya & Katharina Löhr & Stefan Sieber & Betty Waized & Daniel Wilson Ndyetabula, 2024. "Determinants of land tenure formalization under customary and statutory land tenure systems in Tanzania," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Hebinck†, Paul & Smith, Lothar & Aliber, Michael, 2023. "Beyond technocracy: The role of the state in rural development in the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Nicholas Awortwi, 2018. "Social protection is a grassroots reality: Making the case for policy reflections on community‐based social protection actors and services in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 897-913, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:266504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wesggpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.