IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/346695.html

"Is organic really organic? " – Why consumers do (not) trust organic food and what they expect from the organic sector. - Results of focus groups -

Author

Listed:
  • Di Guida, Nina
  • Christoph-Schulz, Inken

Abstract

This paper addresses consumer trust in organic food in order to find out which aspects increase and decrease trust and which trust expectations consumers have. The aim is to strengthen consumer trust on the basis of the findings and to develop trust-building measures. To this end, ten focus groups with German consumers were conducted online in February 2021 and evaluated using content analysis. The results show that there is a predominant lack of trust in organic food. This is based in particular on the fact that organic production is often doubted and there are from the consumer’s point of view too many organic labels. This can be attributed not only to a lack of knowledge on the part of consumers, but also to a lack of transparency within the organic sector and in relation to organic food. Results from the consumer's point of view show that the possibility of control, information and transparency are relevant for trust in organic food and the development of knowledge about organic food can positively influence this trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Guida, Nina & Christoph-Schulz, Inken, 2023. ""Is organic really organic? " – Why consumers do (not) trust organic food and what they expect from the organic sector. - Results of focus groups -," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(01), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346695
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346695/files/IS%20ORGANIC%20REALLY%20ORGANIC.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.346695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Salamon, Petra & Weible, Daniela, 2015. "What is the benefit of organically-reared dairy cattle? Societal perception towards conventional and organic dairy farming," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-8, July.
    2. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    3. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Krittinee Nuttavuthisit & John Thøgersen, 2017. "The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 323-337, January.
    5. Ladwein, Richard & Sánchez Romero, Andrea Milena, 2021. "The role of trust in the relationship between consumers, producers and retailers of organic food: A sector-based approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206233, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    7. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Salamon, Petra & Weible, Daniela, 2015. "What is the benefit of organically-reared dairy cattle? Societal perception towards conventional and organic dairy farming," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206236, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Devitiis, Biagia & Viscecchia, Rosaria & Carfora, Valentina & Cavallo, Carla & Cicia, Gianna & Del Giudice, Teresa & Menna, Concetta & Nardone, Gianluca & Secca, Antonio, . "Parents’ trust in food safety and healthiness of children’s diets: A TPB model explaining the role of retailers and government," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 23(2).
    2. Kristia Kristia & Sándor Kovács & Zoltán Bács & Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Rovers, Anja & Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Brümmer, Nanke & Saggau, Doreen, 2017. "Trust no One? Citizens’ Concerns regarding the Pork and Dairy Supply Chain," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    4. Sarah Verdonk & Keri Chiveralls & Drew Dawson, 2017. "Getting Wasted at WOMADelaide: The Effect of Signage on Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Syed Sibghatullah Shah & Zahid Asghar, 2024. "Individual attitudes towards environmentally friendly choices: a comprehensive analysis of the role of legal rules, religion, and confidence in government," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 629-651, December.
    6. Rovers, Anja & Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Brümmer, Nanke, 2019. "Citizens’ Perception of Different Aspects Regarding German Livestock Production," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(04), October.
    7. Schüler, Stefan & Noack, Eva Maria, 2019. "Does the CAP reflect the population's concerns about agricultural landscapes? A qualitative study in Lower Saxony, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 240-255.
    8. Eva-Maria Waltner & Werner Rieß & Christoph Mischo, 2019. "Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Student Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Svenja Damberg & Ulla A. Saari & Morgane Fritz & Vytaute Dlugoborskyte & Katerina Božič, 2024. "Consumers' purchase behavior of Cradle to Cradle Certified® products—The role of trust and supply chain transparency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8280-8299, December.
    10. Anna Lewandowska & Joanna Witczak & Pasquale Giungato & Christian Dierks & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska, 2018. "Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Nguyen Ngoc Thuy & Gunjan Saxena & Keshab Bhattarai & Hoang Ha Anh, 2025. "A Quantitative Study on the Consumption of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    12. Hwang, Jiyoung & Chung, Jae-Eun, 2019. "What drives consumers to certain retailers for organic food purchase: The role of fit for consumers’ retail store preference," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 293-306.
    13. Atsushi Watabe & Simon Gilby, 2020. "To See a World in a Grain of Sand—The Transformative Potential of Small Community Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Anne-Sophie Gay & Julia M. Warden & Hakan Lane, 2024. "Climate labels and the restaurant industry: a qualitative study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 369-379, June.
    16. Klein, Sophie Maria Anneke & Polzin, Friedemann, 2025. "Greening the retail banking industry: Evidence from German bank account consumers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    17. Rizzi, Francesco & Gigliotti, Marina & Runfola, Andrea & Ferrucci, Luca, 2022. "Don't miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Arthur Filipe de Araújo & Isabel Andrés-Marques & Lorenza López Moreno, 2025. "No Planet-B Attitudes: The Main Driver of Gen Z Travelers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Ayman Kassem & Ahmad Muhammad Ragab & Abdullah Alomran & Eid Alotaibi & Tarek AbdelAzim Ahmed & Eman Shaker & Abdallah Alajloni, 2021. "Underlying Factors of Tourist Social Responsibility (TSR) within the COVID-19 Context: An Empirical Investigation of the Saudi Tourism Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Bożena Gajdzik, 2022. "Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3117-3144, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:346695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.