IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/345292.html

Consumers’ Perspective on Dual‐purpose Chickens as Alternative to the Killing of Day‐old Chicks

Author

Listed:
  • Brümmer, Nanke
  • Christoph‐Schulz, Inken
  • Rovers, Anja‐Karolina

Abstract

The usage of dual‐purpose chicken breeds – a chicken breed which provides meat and eggs at the same time is one of the discussed alternatives to prevent cockerel chicks of laying hens from being killed for economic reasons. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyse consumers’ perspective on dual‐purpose chickens. To get an insight into consumers’ perspective, we initially conducted six focus groups with German consumers focussing on their chicken meat and egg preferences, perception of chicken farming and attitudes towards dual‐purpose chicken breeds. The results show that most of the participants were aware of the killing of day‐old chicks. However, alternatives were scarcely known. After giving the participants information about dual‐purpose chickens, they were generally in favour of this chicken breed. Some participants raised concerns regarding the economic efficiency and the higher product prices. For others, ethical values predominated. All in all, the results demonstrate that the discussants have specific expectations regarding the husbandry conditions but also regarding the product characteristics and the labelling of dual‐purpose chickens.

Suggested Citation

  • Brümmer, Nanke & Christoph‐Schulz, Inken & Rovers, Anja‐Karolina, 2018. "Consumers’ Perspective on Dual‐purpose Chickens as Alternative to the Killing of Day‐old Chicks," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(5), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345292
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345292/files/CONSUMERS%E2%80%99%20PERSPECTIVE%20ON%20DUAL%E2%80%90PURPOSE%20CHICKENS%20AS%20ALTERNATIVE%20TO%20THE%20KILLING%20OF%20DAY%E2%80%90OLD%20CHICKS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pat Auger & Timothy Devinney, 2007. "Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 361-383, December.
    2. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Terlau, Wiltrud & Hirsch, Darya, 2015. "Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon - Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development," 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 206233, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla Rossi & Francesca Rivetti, 2020. "Assessing Young Consumers’ Responses to Sustainable Labels: Insights from a Factorial Experiment in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Sarah Verdonk & Keri Chiveralls & Drew Dawson, 2017. "Getting Wasted at WOMADelaide: The Effect of Signage on Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Syed Sibghatullah Shah & Zahid Asghar, 2024. "Individual attitudes towards environmentally friendly choices: a comprehensive analysis of the role of legal rules, religion, and confidence in government," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(4), pages 629-651, December.
    4. Eva-Maria Waltner & Werner Rieß & Christoph Mischo, 2019. "Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Student Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Svenja Damberg & Ulla A. Saari & Morgane Fritz & Vytaute Dlugoborskyte & Katerina Božič, 2024. "Consumers' purchase behavior of Cradle to Cradle Certified® products—The role of trust and supply chain transparency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8280-8299, December.
    6. Anna Lewandowska & Joanna Witczak & Pasquale Giungato & Christian Dierks & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska, 2018. "Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Atsushi Watabe & Simon Gilby, 2020. "To See a World in a Grain of Sand—The Transformative Potential of Small Community Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Andy Felix Jităreanu & Mioara Mihăilă & Alexandru-Dragoș Robu & Florin-Daniel Lipșa & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Dynamic of Ecological Agriculture Certification in Romania Facing the EU Organic Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Anne-Sophie Gay & Julia M. Warden & Hakan Lane, 2024. "Climate labels and the restaurant industry: a qualitative study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 369-379, June.
    10. Klein, Sophie Maria Anneke & Polzin, Friedemann, 2025. "Greening the retail banking industry: Evidence from German bank account consumers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    11. Arthur Filipe de Araújo & Isabel Andrés-Marques & Lorenza López Moreno, 2025. "No Planet-B Attitudes: The Main Driver of Gen Z Travelers’ Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Ayman Kassem & Ahmad Muhammad Ragab & Abdullah Alomran & Eid Alotaibi & Tarek AbdelAzim Ahmed & Eman Shaker & Abdallah Alajloni, 2021. "Underlying Factors of Tourist Social Responsibility (TSR) within the COVID-19 Context: An Empirical Investigation of the Saudi Tourism Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk & Bożena Gajdzik, 2022. "Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3117-3144, June.
    14. Turck, Angela & Schloemer, Lasse & Terlau, Wiltrud, 2023. "Farmers are caught in Tri-Dilemma - Objectives and Challenges for Biodiversity in German Nature-Protected Areas," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(02), June.
    15. Derstappen, Rebecca & Christoph-Schulz, Inken, 2023. "Identification of consumers’ purchasing criteria and perception of animal welfare and country of origin – a cross-national study," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(01), January.
    16. Smita Dash Baishakhy & Djamel Rahmani & Zein Kallas & José M. Gil, 2026. "Mapping the consumer mind: a novel multidimensional behavioural model delineating purchase intentions for geographical indication certified agri-foods," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Di Guida, Nina & Christoph-Schulz, Inken, 2023. ""Is organic really organic? " – Why consumers do (not) trust organic food and what they expect from the organic sector. - Results of focus groups -," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(01), January.
    18. von Geibler, Justus & Stelzer, Franziska, 2020. "Reallabore als umweltbezogenes Politikinstrument: Kurzstudie im Rahmen der Digitalagenda des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit," Wuppertal Reports 19, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    19. Silvia H. Bonilla & Helton R. O. Silva & Marcia Terra da Silva & Rodrigo Franco Gonçalves & José B. Sacomano, 2018. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Yamoah, Fred A. & Yawson, David Eshun, . "Promoting global well-being through fairtrade food: the role of international exposure," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.