IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/287259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planned intentions versus actual behaviour: assessing the reliability of intention surveys in predicting farmers’ production levels post decoupling

Author

Listed:
  • Hennessy, Thia
  • Kinsella, Anne
  • Thorne, Fiona

Abstract

This paper assesses the reliability of intentions surveys in accurately predicting farmers’ production decisions following decoupling. Two samples of Irish cattle and sheep farms that participated in intentions surveys in 2004 and 2006, asked about their intended production 3 years hence (2007 and 2009), are revisited and their subsequent production decisions examined. Farmers were questioned about their production plans post decoupling and their subsequent production decisions were also observed. The analysis reveals that on aggregate farmers’ production intentions were more accurate in the first than the second survey, i.e. the one conducted before decoupling was introduced. The second survey tended to be characterised by optimism where farmers were more likely to overestimate their future production levels. At an individual level only about half of all respondents acted according to their earlier stated intentions. The majority of the remainder tended to be optimistic, i.e. over estimating their future production levels. Farms are classified into three groups; those that are accurate, those initially overestimating their future production (optimistic) and those underestimating their future production (pessimistic). The multinomial logit model suggests that for the most part the intention-behaviour gap relating to production intentions and behaviour post decoupling was influenced by very few farm and farmer characteristics that were available through the FADN database.

Suggested Citation

  • Hennessy, Thia & Kinsella, Anne & Thorne, Fiona, 2016. "Planned intentions versus actual behaviour: assessing the reliability of intention surveys in predicting farmers’ production levels post decoupling," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 5(3), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:287259
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.287259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/287259/files/Hennessy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.287259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmytro Serebrennikov & Fiona Thorne & Zein Kallas & Sinéad N. McCarthy, 2020. "Factors Influencing Adoption of Sustainable Farming Practices in Europe: A Systemic Review of Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Aijun Guo & Xiaoyun Wei & Fanglei Zhong & Penglong Wang & Xiaoyu Song, 2022. "Does Cognition of Resources and the Environment Affect Farmers’ Production Efficiency? Study of Oasis Agriculture in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:287259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.