IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the efficiency of processing non-traditional fruit raw materials at beet sugar plants

Author

Listed:
  • Samilyk, Maryna
  • Kovalova, Olha
  • Yudina, Tetyana
  • Bolhova, Nataliia
  • Klochko, Tetiana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to develop a rational production model for processing wild fruit raw materials at a typical sugar factory with the production of new types of products, assess the effectiveness of this innovative project, and develop a business model for a sugar factory that produces traditional sugar, fortified sugar, and powdered food additives. Methodology / approach. An economic-and-statistical method was used to analyse the sugar industry. A SWOT analysis was used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the innovative project. The economic efficiency of the innovative project was assessed by a calculation method taking into account the time factor. Systematisation of information and presentation of the assessment was carried out using the method of generalisation and formalisation. Visually, the results are presented using graphical and tabular methods. The CANVAS model template was used to build the business model. The approximation method and experimental studies were used to determine the optimal concentration of the sugar solution. Results. A production model of a beet sugar plant is proposed, which, along with traditional activities, involves the processing of wild plant fruits and the production of new, more beneficial types of products from the point of view of food security – vitaminised sugar and powder additives. An assessment of the effectiveness of the innovative project was carried out, according to which the break-even point of the project was 54–57% of the nominal production volume, the profitability index was 1.4, and the payback period was 3.4 years, which confirms the effectiveness of the proposed production model. Based on the results of the SWOT analysis, strategic goals and a business model for a sugar factory that will produce traditional sugar were developed, as well as new types of products were proposed. Various types of effects from the implementation of an innovative project for the production of vitaminised sugar and powder additives have been identified, which include not only increasing the profitability of the sugar factory, but also partially solving the problem of seasonality of production and employment in local territorial communities. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a technology for waste-free processing of non-traditional raw materials at sugar refineries has been proposed. The proposed method of processing the fruits of wild plants in a sugar factory will allow expanding the range of sugar and bringing new organic products to the market, partially solving the problem of seasonality of sugar factories, and improving employment in local communities. Expanding the range to include new useful products will have a positive impact on the health of the population and will more fully satisfy consumer needs. Practical value / implications. The results of the study can be used by beet processing enterprises that seek to diversify their activities, as well as partially solve the problem of seasonality, increase market share and revenues by introducing new types of products to the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Samilyk, Maryna & Kovalova, Olha & Yudina, Tetyana & Bolhova, Nataliia & Klochko, Tetiana, . "Assessment of the efficiency of processing non-traditional fruit raw materials at beet sugar plants," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364312
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364312/files/7_Samilyk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephanie J. Zhu & Tiza Ignatius Mfuni & Bronwen Powell, 2024. "Greater Attention to Wild Foods and Cultural Knowledge Supports Increased Nutrition Outcomes Associated with Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Karolina Pawlak & Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, 2020. "The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Kvasha, Serhii & Pavlenko, Oleksiy & Vakulenko, Vitalii & Moroz, Mykola & Liu, Xiaowei, 2024. "Diet of Ukrainian citizens as a component of food security in the conditions of the martial law," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    4. Madison M. Scott & Michael S. Carolan & Michael A. Long, 2024. "The Role of Wild Food in Fostering Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Stetsiv, Iryna, 2024. "International experience in applying and developing the economic mechanism of public administration of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    6. Bartosz Mickiewicz & Igor Britchenko, 2022. "Modern Trends of Sustainable Development in the Sugar Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 717-728.
    7. Agus Dwi Nugroho & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 180-188.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna Dudek & Joanna Myszkowska-Ryciak & Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, 2021. "Profiles of Food Insecurity: Similarities and Differences across Selected CEE Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Susmita Das Riya, . "Impact of industry on agricultural development in Sylhet region of Bangladesh: Farmer’s perception," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 11(2).
    3. Muhammad Mumtaz Khan & Muhammad Tahir Akram & Rhonda Janke & Rashad Waseem Khan Qadri & Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi & Aitazaz A. Farooque, 2020. "Urban Horticulture for Food Secure Cities through and beyond COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Noah, Afees & David, Oladipo & Grobler, Wynand & Alabi, Moshood, . "Gender dynamics in agricultural employment for food security in sub-Saharan Africa," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7(1).
    5. Lanlan Li & Lu Zhang & Xiudong Wang, 2024. "Research on the Dynamic Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Listed Seed Enterprises in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Rombeallo, Intan Parumbuan & Jamil, Muhammad Hatta & Rukmana, Didi, . "Factors affecting farmers’ decision to join coffee producer cooperatives to improve their welfare," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4).
    7. Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke & Roseline Daberechi Ejike & Emeka Emmanuel Osuji & Nneka Maris Chidiebere-Mark, 2024. "Does climate change affect crops differently? New evidence from Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 393-419, January.
    8. Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Michał Gazdecki & Krystyna Rejman & Joanna Kobus-Cisowska & Sylwia Łaba & Robert Łaba, 2020. "How to Prevent Bread Losses in the Baking and Confectionery Industry?—Measurement, Causes, Management and Prevention," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Sharina Shariff & Siti ‘Aisyah Baharudin & Nor Asmat Ismail, 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Agriculture Economic Sector in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(1), pages 285-303.
    10. Mahdi Imani Bashokoh & Gergely Tóth & Omeralfaroug Ali, 2025. "Corporate Concentration and Market Dynamics in Hungary’s Food Manufacturing Industry Between 1993 and 2022," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Michael I. E. Edaba & Anthony O. Onoja & Zelda A. Elum, . "Analysis of Farm Credit Access Among Cassava-Based Farmers in South-South Nigeria," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 11(2).
    12. Eleftherios Giovanis & Oznur Ozdamar, 2025. "The transboundary effects of climate change and global adaptation: the case of the Euphrates–Tigris water basin in Turkey and Iraq," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 1935-1972, April.
    13. Seyed Mohammad Hosseini & Mohammad Bagher Qhalibaf & Seyed Mojtaba Moussavi Neghabi & Seyed Ali Hosseini, 2024. "Developing a model of strategies for enhancing food security against the phenomenon of food geopolitization," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6635-6652, March.
    14. Bonginkosi E. Mthembu & Thobani Cele & Xolile Mkhize, 2025. "Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Infrastructure and Resources: Insights from Communal Land Farming Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Wendy Geza & Mjabuliseni Simon Cloapas Ngidi & Rob Slotow & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2022. "The Dynamics of Youth Employment and Empowerment in Agriculture and Rural Development in South Africa: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Ying Zhang & Xinyu Xie & Xiaoping Qiu & Zheng Jing & Yongqian Yu & Yan Wang, 2023. "Study on Livelihood Resilience of Rural Residents under the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Ethnic Areas of Western Sichuan, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Patricia Mussali-Galante & María Luisa Castrejón-Godínez & José Antonio Díaz-Soto & Ángela Patricia Vargas-Orozco & Héctor Miguel Quiroz-Medina & Efraín Tovar-Sánchez & Alexis Rodríguez, 2023. "Biobeds, a Microbial-Based Remediation System for the Effective Treatment of Pesticide Residues in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Serhii Kvasha & Vitalii Vakulenko & Oleksiy Pavlenko, 2024. "Organisational And Economic Support For Food Security In The Context Of Extraordinary Challenges," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 10(2).
    19. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Sokkeang Be & Soydoa Vinitnantharat & Anawat Pinisakul, 2021. "Effect of Mangrove Biochar Residue Amended Shrimp Pond Sediment on Nitrogen Adsorption and Leaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.