IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364312.html

Assessment of the efficiency of processing non-traditional fruit raw materials at beet sugar plants

Author

Listed:
  • Samilyk, Maryna
  • Kovalova, Olha
  • Yudina, Tetyana
  • Bolhova, Nataliia
  • Klochko, Tetiana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to develop a rational production model for processing wild fruit raw materials at a typical sugar factory with the production of new types of products, assess the effectiveness of this innovative project, and develop a business model for a sugar factory that produces traditional sugar, fortified sugar, and powdered food additives. Methodology / approach. An economic-and-statistical method was used to analyse the sugar industry. A SWOT analysis was used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the innovative project. The economic efficiency of the innovative project was assessed by a calculation method taking into account the time factor. Systematisation of information and presentation of the assessment was carried out using the method of generalisation and formalisation. Visually, the results are presented using graphical and tabular methods. The CANVAS model template was used to build the business model. The approximation method and experimental studies were used to determine the optimal concentration of the sugar solution. Results. A production model of a beet sugar plant is proposed, which, along with traditional activities, involves the processing of wild plant fruits and the production of new, more beneficial types of products from the point of view of food security – vitaminised sugar and powder additives. An assessment of the effectiveness of the innovative project was carried out, according to which the break-even point of the project was 54–57% of the nominal production volume, the profitability index was 1.4, and the payback period was 3.4 years, which confirms the effectiveness of the proposed production model. Based on the results of the SWOT analysis, strategic goals and a business model for a sugar factory that will produce traditional sugar were developed, as well as new types of products were proposed. Various types of effects from the implementation of an innovative project for the production of vitaminised sugar and powder additives have been identified, which include not only increasing the profitability of the sugar factory, but also partially solving the problem of seasonality of production and employment in local territorial communities. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a technology for waste-free processing of non-traditional raw materials at sugar refineries has been proposed. The proposed method of processing the fruits of wild plants in a sugar factory will allow expanding the range of sugar and bringing new organic products to the market, partially solving the problem of seasonality of sugar factories, and improving employment in local communities. Expanding the range to include new useful products will have a positive impact on the health of the population and will more fully satisfy consumer needs. Practical value / implications. The results of the study can be used by beet processing enterprises that seek to diversify their activities, as well as partially solve the problem of seasonality, increase market share and revenues by introducing new types of products to the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Samilyk, Maryna & Kovalova, Olha & Yudina, Tetyana & Bolhova, Nataliia & Klochko, Tetiana, . "Assessment of the efficiency of processing non-traditional fruit raw materials at beet sugar plants," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364312
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364312/files/7_Samilyk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karolina Pawlak & Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, 2020. "The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Kvasha, Serhii & Pavlenko, Oleksiy & Vakulenko, Vitalii & Moroz, Mykola & Liu, Xiaowei, 2024. "Diet of Ukrainian citizens as a component of food security in the conditions of the martial law," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    3. Madison M. Scott & Michael S. Carolan & Michael A. Long, 2024. "The Role of Wild Food in Fostering Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Stetsiv, Iryna, 2024. "International experience in applying and developing the economic mechanism of public administration of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(01), March.
    5. Bartosz Mickiewicz & Igor Britchenko, 2022. "Modern Trends of Sustainable Development in the Sugar Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 717-728.
    6. Agus Dwi Nugroho & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 180-188.
    7. Stephanie J. Zhu & Tiza Ignatius Mfuni & Bronwen Powell, 2024. "Greater Attention to Wild Foods and Cultural Knowledge Supports Increased Nutrition Outcomes Associated with Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madison M. Scott & Michael S. Carolan & Michael A. Long, 2024. "The Role of Wild Food in Fostering Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Ana Alicia Dipierri, 2025. "Behavioral and managerial changes towards sustainable development in the food system," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/395398, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Abdulazeez Hudu Wudil & Muhammad Usman & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Ladislav Pilař & Mortala Boye, 2022. "Reversing Years for Global Food Security: A Review of the Food Security Situation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Khushwant Singh & Mohit Yadav & Dheerdhwaj Barak & Shivani Bansal & Fernando Moreira, 2025. "Machine-Learning-Based Frameworks for Reliable and Sustainable Crop Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Uche, C. & Ajie, E. N., 2025. "Agricultural Policies in Nigeria: Impact on The Nigerian Economy," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(1), pages 1-11.
    6. Justice Mundonde & Patricia Lindelwa Makoni, 2025. "Bridging the Green Infrastructure Gap: Determinants of Renewable Energy PPP Financing in Emerging and Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Hanna Dudek & Joanna Myszkowska-Ryciak & Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, 2021. "Profiles of Food Insecurity: Similarities and Differences across Selected CEE Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Abdullah Kaviani Rad & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Hassan Azarm & Siva K. Balasundram & Muhammad Sultan, 2021. "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Security and Agriculture in Iran: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Obaid Ullah & Zia Ur Rahman & Aijun Guo & Ali Zeb, 2024. "Disaggregated Public Spending, Income Inequality and its Effect on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 20823-20850, December.
    10. Susmita Das Riya, . "Impact of industry on agricultural development in Sylhet region of Bangladesh: Farmer’s perception," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 11(2).
    11. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2022. "Corporate Web Positioning as a Strategic Communication Tool in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Muhammad Mumtaz Khan & Muhammad Tahir Akram & Rhonda Janke & Rashad Waseem Khan Qadri & Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi & Aitazaz A. Farooque, 2020. "Urban Horticulture for Food Secure Cities through and beyond COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Khalil A. Ammar & Ahmed M. S. Kheir & Beshir M. Ali & Balan Sundarakani & Ioannis Manikas, 2024. "Developing an analytical framework for estimating food security indicators in the United Arab Emirates: A review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 5689-5708, March.
    14. Etian Ngobeni & Chiedza L. Muchopa, 2022. "The Impact of Government Expenditure in Agriculture and Other Selected Variables on the Value of Agricultural Production in South Africa (1983–2019): Vector Autoregressive Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Jiaqi Zhang & Hui Yong & Ning Lv, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Balancing Productivity and Sustainability: Insights into Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Arid Region of Northwest China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13828-13856, September.
    16. Mahali Elizabeth Lesala & Nyarai Mujuru & Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2025. "Evaluating the Economic Impact of Market Participation on the Well-Being of Smallholder Irrigators: Evidence from the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Noah, Afees & David, Oladipo & Grobler, Wynand & Alabi, Moshood, . "Gender dynamics in agricultural employment for food security in sub-Saharan Africa," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7(1).
    18. Jing Li & Wei Li & Lei Wang & Baihui Jin, 2021. "Environmental and Cost Impacts of Food Waste in University Canteen from a Life Cycle Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Mfanufikile Mabuza & Jorine T. Ndoro, 2023. "Borich’s Needs Model Analysis of Smallholder Farmers’ Competence in Irrigation Water Management: Case Study of Nkomazi Local Municipality, Mpumalanga Province in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Jiaqi Zhang & Yannan Liu & Rongrong Zhang & Jiaqi Fan & Zhiming Dai & Hui Liang, 2025. "Research on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Cropland in Tanzania from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.