IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330342.html

Climate-oriented land use management

Author

Listed:
  • Budziak, Olha
  • Budziak, Vasyl
  • Drebot, Oksana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to investigate the interaction of climate change with land use to properly understand the consequences and make management decisions, taking into account all the risks and opportunities to ensure non-extensive use and long-term conservation of land resources for future generations. Methodology / approach. The methodological approach involves studying the practice of land use management by analyzing integrated indicators: vulnerability of land use to climate change (responding for climate change prevention) and assessing the impact of climate change on land use (adaptation to climate change) the basis for the calculation of which were quantitative and qualitative indicators for the period 2000–2020. Results. It is established that the existing land management system in Ukraine in accordance with the policy of international organizations and the Sustainable Development Agenda until 2030 requires consideration of new technologies and practices in combating climate change and its consequences based on national conditions and priorities. Studies of the effectiveness of management measures in the field of land use showed that in the period 2000–2009, responding measures for climate change prevention were mostly targeted, and in 2010–2020 acquired signs of systemicity, while for the entire study period the effectiveness of adaptation measures underwent minor changes. At the same time, having positive dynamics, but different trends in the period from 2012 to 2014, measures to respond and adapt to climate challenges equalized in effectiveness. It is found that after 2014, more efforts, financial resources and means have begun to be spent on combating the consequences than on measures to adapt to climate change. This means that the current land management system needs immediate transformation. After all, it is impossible to allow any extreme phenomena to jeopardize the food security of the state. The effectiveness of management activities should be not only in a timely response, but first of all in trying to be proactive reducing vulnerability and increasing the resilience of land use to climate change. Originality / scientific novelty. This is the first comparative analysis of the effectiveness of land management measures regarding the interaction of climate change with land use according to indicators in dynamics. The need to increase the adaptive capacity to reduce potential losses in land use in the future is substantiated. Practical value / implications. The results of the study can serve as a basis for modernization of existing land use projects and improvement of ways to manage them on the basis of low-carbon development to ensure food security of the population of Ukraine in the context of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Budziak, Olha & Budziak, Vasyl & Drebot, Oksana, . "Climate-oriented land use management," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330342
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330342/files/6_Budziak_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Budziak, Olha & Budziak, Vasyl & Hrytsak, Оlena, . "Effective use of “clean” lands of Ukraine under conditions of sustainable development," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(3).
    2. Andrea, Veronika, 2022. "Mediterranean forest policy beyond the Paris Climate Agreement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Pasquale Marcello Falcone, 2020. "Environmental regulation and green investments: the role of green finance," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 159-173.
    4. Amadu, Festus O. & Miller, Daniel C. & McNamara, Paul E., 2020. "Agroforestry as a pathway to agricultural yield impacts in climate-smart agriculture investments: Evidence from southern Malawi," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Hualou Long & Yingnan Zhang & Li Ma & Shuangshuang Tu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions: Progress, Challenges and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    6. João Camargo & Iñaki Barcena & Pedro M. Soares & Luísa Schmidt & Javier Andaluz, 2020. "Mind the climate policy gaps: climate change public policy and reality in Portugal, Spain and Morocco," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 151-169, July.
    7. Kay, Sonja & Rega, Carlo & Moreno, Gerardo & den Herder, Michael & Palma, João H.N. & Borek, Robert & Crous-Duran, Josep & Freese, Dirk & Giannitsopoulos, Michail & Graves, Anil & Jäger, Mareike & Lam, 2019. "Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 581-593.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yurii Tsapko & Anatolii Kucher & Bahaa Meshref & Vitaliy Krupin & Albina Rozmarina & Olesya Holovina & Iryna Skorokhod, 2023. "Structural Amelioration of Soils for Sustainable Land Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea, Veronika, 2022. "Mediterranean forest policy beyond the Paris Climate Agreement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Fatima Zahra Moussaid & Hikma Bachegour & Mounir Jerry & Ahlam Qafas, 2025. "Probing the asymmetric impact of clean energy technologies on environmental quality: testing load capacity curve hypothesis in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4425-4444, February.
    3. Wang, Fanyi & Ma, Wanying & Mirza, Nawazish & Altuntaş, Mehmet, 2023. "Green financing, financial uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and oil prices volatility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Qadri, Hussain Mohi ud Din & Ali, Hassnian & Abideen, Zain ul & Jafar, Ahmad, 2024. "Mapping the Evolution of Green Finance Research and Development in Emerging Green Economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Jie, Yu & Rasool, Zeeshan & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Mattayaphutron, Suchira & Murad, Muhammad, 2024. "Sustainable Central Asia: Impact of fintech, natural resources, renewable energy, and financial inclusion to combat environmental degradation and achieving sustainable development goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Benavides-Franco, Julián & Gómez, Juan M. & Pérez-Uribe, Miguel A., 2023. "Determinants of Project Finance success for renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-201.
    7. Lin, Chuan & Liu, Yilun & Yuan, Zhongyou & Wang, Hongmei & Li, Guang & Zhou, Zegen & Wang, Han & An, Xinyue, 2025. "Harmonizing stakeholder interests in urban renewal: A novel planning approach using explainable machine learning and spatial optimization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han & Minghua Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation and Impact Mechanism of High-Quality Development in China’s Coastal Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Euthalia Hanggari Sittadewi & Iwan Gunawan Tejakusuma & Titin Handayani & Arif Dwi Santoso & Adrin Tohari & Asep Mulyono & Zufialdi Zakaria & Evensius Bayu Budiman & Hilmi El Hafidz Fatahillah & Riski, 2025. "Novel Rap-Landslide Method for Assessing Agroforestry Sustainability in Landslide-Prone Areas," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Luo, Rui & Chen, Ping & Wang, Yachao, 2024. "Green investment products, consumer behavior, and regional carbon emissions levels," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. He, Yi & Chen, Haixin & Zhang, Tingyu, 2024. "Exploring the impact of economic and environmental target constraints on and the green investment efficiency of firms: The moderating role of anti-corruption," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    13. Shubhendu Singh & Gaurvendra Singh, 2024. "Agroforestry for Sustainable Development: Assessing Frameworks to Drive Agricultural Sector Growth," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22281-22317, September.
    14. Hari Wahyu Wijayanto & Kai-An Lo & Hery Toiba & Moh Shadiqur Rahman, 2022. "Does Agroforestry Adoption Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-10, August.
    15. Li Ma & Yingnan Zhang & Muye Gan & Zhengying Shan, 2023. "Rethinking Man–Land Relations in China: A Multidisciplinary Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-7, August.
    16. Fanya Qin & Katsue Fukamachi & Shozo Shibata, 2022. "Land-Use/Landscape Pattern Changes and Related Environmental Driving Forces in a Dong Ethnic Minority Village in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Ioan Batrancea & Larissa Batrancea & Malar Maran Rathnaswamy & Horia Tulai & Gheorghe Fatacean & Mircea-Iosif Rus, 2020. "Greening the Financial System in USA, Canada and Brazil: A Panel Data Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Wanmei Hu & Zaike Gu & Kangning Xiong & Yaoru Lu & Zuju Li & Min Zhang & Liheng You & Huan Ruan, 2024. "A Review of Value Realization and Rural Revitalization of Eco-Products: Insights for Agroforestry Ecosystem in Karst Desertification Control," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, November.
    19. Nicola Favretto & Lindsay C. Stringer, 2024. "Climate resilient development in vulnerable geographies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 1-32, December.
    20. Cong Wang & Xiaohan Zhang & Liwei Liu, 2025. "Land Use Change in the Russian Far East and Its Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.