IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water Saving And Water Productivity Under Buried Clay Pot And Drip Irrigation Systems For Cabbage In Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Hatungimana, JC
  • Niyigaba, JB
  • Kwitonda, TS
  • Tuyishimire, P

Abstract

This research evaluated the effects of Clay Pot Irrigation System (CPIS) on water saving and water productivity compared with Drip Irrigation System (DIS) as microirrigation systems in cabbage production in Rwanda. This research was conducted at the Rwanda Polytechnic/Integrated Polytechnic Regional College Huye (RP/IPRC Huye) farm (2°35′48″ S and 29°44′21″ E, Elevation of 1769 m above sea level), in Huye district of Rwanda. The experimental designed was a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three treatments and three replications. The experimental treatments were Clay pot irrigation system, Drip irrigation system, and the control treatment (No irrigation). The soil type was a sand clay loam. The clay pots used were manufactured by mixing clay and sand at the ratio of 4:1 and dried with burning dry grass. Pots were buried under the soil up to their necks, with about 2 cm of their top above the surface of the surrounding. The crop variety used for the study was Zawadi F1 of cabbage produced by the East African Co. Seed, which is adaptable under the agroclimatic conditions of the Huye district of Rwanda. Crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling were estimated by using CROPWAT 8.0 software. Organic manure (20 tons ha-1) was applied for whole trial during tillage, Nitrogen-Phosphorous-Potassium/ NPK 17-17- 17 (300 kg ha-1) was uniformly applied around the seedling (ring application) and Urea (300 kg ha-1) was split applied, first after three weeks of transplanting, and the second application was five weeks after transplanting. The water productivity of CPIS was 36.17 kg m-3 for DIS was 25.4 kg m-3, while the control was 31.1 kg m-3. The results of this research show that CPIS increases water productivity and water saving. Water saved is 40.23% when CPIS is compared with DIS. Clay pot irrigation system can be a viable option for water scarce areas, particularly for small-scale farmers looking to improve their productivity with their small holdings of land in sandy and drier environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatungimana, JC & Niyigaba, JB & Kwitonda, TS & Tuyishimire, P, 2023. "Water Saving And Water Productivity Under Buried Clay Pot And Drip Irrigation Systems For Cabbage In Rwanda," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(3), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340664
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340664/files/Hatungimana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bainbridge, David A., 2001. "Buried clay pot irrigation: a little known but very efficient traditional method of irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 79-88, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yaohui & Yao, Chunping & Wu, Pute & Zhang, Lin & Zhu, Delan & Chen, Junying & Du, Yichao, 2021. "Effectiveness of a subsurface irrigation system with ceramic emitters under low-pressure conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Cai, Yaohui & Wu, Pute & Zhang, Lin & Zhu, Delan & Chen, Junying & Wu, ShouJun & Zhao, Xiao, 2017. "Simulation of soil water movement under subsurface irrigation with porous ceramic emitter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 244-256.
    3. Pachpute, J.S., 2010. "A package of water management practices for sustainable growth and improved production of vegetable crop in labour and water scarce Sub-Saharan Africa," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(9), pages 1251-1258, September.
    4. Qi, Wei & Zhang, Zhanyu & Wang, Ce & Huang, Mingyi, 2021. "Prediction of infiltration behaviors and evaluation of irrigation efficiency in clay loam soil under Moistube® irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Yevheniia Varyvoda & Taylor Ann Foerster & Joona Mikkola & Matthew M. Mars, 2024. "Promising Nature-Based Solutions to Support Climate Adaptation of Arizona’s Local Food Entrepreneurs and Optimize One Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Jun Zhang & Lin Li, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Infiltration Wetting Front of Ring-Shaped Root Emitters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Abu-Zreig, Majed M. & Abe, Yukuo & Isoda, Hiroko, 2006. "The auto-regulative capability of pitcher irrigation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 272-278, October.
    8. Naik, B.S. & Panda, R.K. & Nayak, S.C. & Sharma, S.D., 2008. "Hydraulics and salinity profile of pitcher irrigation in saline water condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1129-1134, October.
    9. Siyal, A.A. & Skaggs, T.H., 2009. "Measured and simulated soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe sub-surface irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 893-904, June.
    10. Hojjat Ghorbani Vaghei & Hossein Ali Bahrami & Farzin Nasiri Saleh, 2023. "Optimizing Soil Moisture in Subsurface Irrigation System Based on Porous Clay Capsule Technique," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(8), pages 3037-3051, June.
    11. Nazari, Ehsan & Besharat, Sina & Zeinalzadeh, Kamran & Mohammadi, Adel, 2021. "Measurement and simulation of the water flow and root uptake in soil under subsurface drip irrigation of apple tree," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.