IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/368104.html

Analysis of Production, Socio-economic and Institutional Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Banana Producers in Kirinyaga Central Sub-county, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Mkenye, Mativa Jackson
  • Kingori, Gathungu Geofrey
  • Anaye, Omukoko Caroline
  • Njeru, Rithaa Jafford
  • Mwangi, Ireri Dave

Abstract

Banana provides food, nutrition security and income for most households and is fourth most popular food crop in the world after wheat, maize and rice. Despite its significance, full potential of banana production in Kenya remains unexploited by smallholder producers due to low technical efficiency especially in the utilization of farming inputs due to production, socio-economic and institutional issues, among other factors. In Kirinyaga County, the actual banana production is estimated at 4-18 tonnes per acre against the potential of 30-40 tonnes. Despite the limited supply of resources for production, attainment of highest possible levels of technical efficiency is key to achieving efficiency in banana farming. The study analyzed the effects of production, socio-economic and institutional factors on technical efficiency among smallholder banana producers in Kirinyaga Central Sub-County, Kenya. A cross-sectional research design was used in this study. Questionnaire was administered randomly to 402 respondents’ selected using multi-stage sampling technique. Data was analyzed using Stata version 17 and SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics described the production, socio-economic and institutional factors. A stochastic frontier analysis approach was used to model the efficiency levels using Cobb-Douglas functional form estimated using the maximum likelihood technique. The study showed that technical efficiency varied between 0.93% to 95.45% and average technical efficiency of 83.14%. The study found that manure and planting materials had positive effects on technical efficiency whereas land size had negative impact. The findings established that age of decision maker and size of the household had negative effects whereas education, experience, producer group membership and market access had positive effects on technical efficiency. The study advises people with high levels of education to get into banana farming because smallholder producers with greater levels of education demonstrated high levels of production efficiency. Additionally, to improve technical efficiencies, farmer group development and membership are encouraged and also extension services should be made more accessible.

Suggested Citation

  • Mkenye, Mativa Jackson & Kingori, Gathungu Geofrey & Anaye, Omukoko Caroline & Njeru, Rithaa Jafford & Mwangi, Ireri Dave, 2024. "Analysis of Production, Socio-economic and Institutional Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Banana Producers in Kirinyaga Central Sub-county, Kenya," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 42(10), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:368104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/368104/files/Mkenye42102024AJAEES123155.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battese, George E., 1992. "Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: a survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 7(3-4), pages 185-208, October.
    2. Norman T. Muzeza & Amon Taruvinga & Peter Mukarumbwa, 2023. "Analysis of factors affecting technical efficiency of A1 smallholder maize farmers under command agriculture scheme in Zimbabwe: The case of Chegutu and Zvimba Districts," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 2163543-216, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coelli, Tim J., 1995. "Recent Developments In Frontier Modelling And Efficiency Measurement," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Fernando Antonio Slaibe Postali & Fabiana Fontes Rocha, 2011. "Resource windfalls,fiscal effort and public spending: evidence from Brazilianmunicipalities," Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 64, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    3. Mochebelele, Motsamai T. & Winter-Nelson, Alex, 2000. "Migrant Labor and Farm Technical Efficiency in Lesotho," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 143-153, January.
    4. Dhehibi, Boubaker & Lachaal, Lassaad & Elloumi, Mohamed & Messaoud, Emna B., 2007. "Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Tunisian Citrus Growing Sector," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9391, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Anthony Rezitis & Kostas Tsiboukas & Stauros Tsoukalas, 2002. "Measuring technical efficiency in the Greek agricultural sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(11), pages 1345-1357.
    6. Banfi, Silvia & Filippini, Massimo, 2010. "Resource rent taxation and benchmarking--A new perspective for the Swiss hydropower sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2302-2308, May.
    7. Guy Nkamleu, 2004. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress and Efficiency Change in African Agriculture," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 16(1), pages 203-222.
    8. Massimo Filippini & Jörg Wild & Michael Kuenzle, 2001. "Scale and cost efficiency in the Swiss electricity distribution industry: evidence from a frontier cost approach," CEPE Working paper series 01-08, CEPE Center for Energy Policy and Economics, ETH Zurich.
    9. Puig-Junoy, Jaume & Argiles, Josep M., 2004. "The influence of management accounting use on farm inefficiency," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Nguyen Thuy Trang & Vo Hong Tu & Steven W. Kopp, 2024. "Trade-offs between economic and environmental efficiencies in shrimp farming: implications for sustainable agricultural restructuring in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6677-6701, March.
    11. Munir Ahmad, 2003. "Agricultural Productivity, Efficiency, and Rural Poverty in Irrigated Pakistan: A Stochastic Production FrontiermAnalysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 219-248.
    12. Atheendar S. Venkataramani & K.R. Shanmugam & Jennifer Prah Ruger, 2010. "Health, Technical Efficiency, And Agricultural Production In Indian Districts," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Adeogun, O. A. & Alimi, T. & Adeyemo, R., 2014. "Comparative Analysis of Profitability and Technical Efficiency of Fish Farming Using Different Rearing Techniques in Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 3(5).
    14. Lachaal, Lassaad & Chebil, Ali & Dhehibi, Boubaker, 2004. "A Panel Data Approach to the Measurement of Technical Efficiency and its Determinants: Some Evidence from the Tunisian Agro-Food Industry," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(01), pages 1-9, January.
    15. Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Moreira, Victor H. & Diaz, Jose, 2012. "Natural Resource Conservation and Technical Efficiency from Small-scale Farmers in Central Chile," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126227, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. U Pascual & N P Russell & A A Omer, 2003. "Does Loss in Biodiversity Compromise Productivity in Intensive Agriculture?," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0322, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    17. Shunji Oniki & Melaku Berhe & Koichi Takenaka, 2020. "Efficiency Impact of the Communal Land Distribution Program in Northern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Mehta, Rajesh & Narrod, Clare & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Livestock industrialization, trade and social-health-environment impacts in developing countries: a case of Indian poultry sector," MPRA Paper 32678, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Eric Fosu Oteng-Abayie, 2017. "Technical efficiency and total factor productivity of rural banks in Ghana," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1366088-136, January.
    20. Abdul Wadud, 2013. "Impact of Microcredit on Agricultural Farm Performance and Food Security in Bangladesh," Working Papers 14, Institute of Microfinance (InM).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:368104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.