IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/356151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research: From Cross-Discipline Programs to Published Articles

Author

Listed:
  • Hochman, Gal
  • Jin, Yanhong

Abstract

This paper discusses the effective integration of undergraduate students into research, ensuring mutually beneficial outcomes for students, faculty, higher education institutes, and society at large. Student candidates are identified through a screening process leveraging the existing institutional resources and programs. Selection criteria, including minimum grade point average (GPA), strong writing skills, and achievements in challenging quantitative courses, are employed. Once a suitable candidate is identified, research collaboration commences. We work with the student to identify a topic aligned with our projects that piques their interest and curiosity, while ensuring feasibility within the timeframe. Subsequently, we invest a month or two in guiding the student through relevant literature, building a comprehensive understanding of the chosen subject matter. As the research question evolves, we assist the student in mastering the necessary tools and methods, providing relevant programming code or directing the student to specific knowledge domains. The structured approach mirrors the collaboration with graduate students. We deliberately avoid limiting our selection to specific disciplines, promoting diversity in student engagement. This exposure broadens their understanding of applied economics research and enriches the educational experience for both students and faculty mentors. The result is the cultivation of cross-disciplinary programs that contribute to the growth and development of undergraduate research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hochman, Gal & Jin, Yanhong, 2025. "Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research: From Cross-Discipline Programs to Published Articles," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:356151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356151/files/2HochmanFull.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie T. Jones & Amy E. L. Barlow & Merna Villarejo, 2010. "Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and Achievement in Biology," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(1), pages 82-115, January.
    2. Karen W. Bauer & Joan S. Bennett, 2003. "Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(2), pages 210-230, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katelyn M Cooper & Logan E Gin & Barierane Akeeh & Carolyn E Clark & Joshua S Hunter & Travis B Roderick & Deanna B Elliott & Luis A Gutierrez & Rebecca M Mello & Leilani D Pfeiffer & Rachel A Scott &, 2019. "Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Dawayne Whittington & Latricia E. Wallace & Cherilynn R. Shadding, 2017. "Proxies for Success: How the Application Process Correlates to PhD Pursuit for a Small Diversity Research Program," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    3. Hamilton, Lynn & Mathews, Leah Greden & Grant, Richard & Wolf, Marianne McGarry, 2013. "The Value of Undergraduate Research: A Pilot Study of Agribusiness Alumni Perceptions," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149846, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Jalbert, Terrance, 2008. "Experiences in publishing peer-reviewed research with undergraduate accounting and finance students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 104-117.
    5. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007833 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Julie J. Park & Young K. Kim & Cinthya Salazar & Shannon Hayes, 2020. "Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 330-356, May.
    7. Bornemann, Janina, 2021. "Forschendes Lernen in der geographischen Hochschullehre," Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsgeographie und Regionalentwicklung 1-2021, Universität Bremen, Institut für Geographie.
    8. Anastasia Rogova & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Shine Chang & Kamisha H. Escoto & Kayce D. Solari Williams & Crystal Roberson & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Promoting Cancer Health Equity: A Qualitative Study of Mentee and Mentor Perspectives of a Training Program for Underrepresented Scholars in Cancer Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Parama Chaudhury & Christian Spielmann, 2016. "Let's Make a Movie! Introducing Economics With a Multimedia Project," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41, June.
    10. Tien-Ling Hu & Victor M. H. Borden, 2025. "Bridging the Divide: Exploring Equity Gaps in Undergraduate Research Participation Among Black and African American and Hispanic and Latinx Students," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-44, May.
    11. Kendra H Oliver & Christina Keeton & Roger Chalkley & Elizabeth Bowman, 2021. "Virtual Vanderbilt Summer Science Academy highlighted the opportunity to impact early STEMM students career knowledge through narrative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Hilary A Coller & Stacey Beggs & Samantha Andrews & Jeff Maloy & Alec Chiu & Sriram Sankararaman & Matteo Pellegrini & Nelson Freimer & Tracy Johnson & Jeanette Papp & Eleazar Eskin & Alexander Hoffma, 2022. "Bruins-in-Genomics: Evaluation of the impact of a UCLA undergraduate summer program in computational biology on participating students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Traci A Giuliano & Isham E Kimbell & Emily S Olson & Jennifer L Howell, 2022. "High impact: Examining predictors of faculty-undergraduate coauthored publication and presentation in psychology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Grant Hokit & Sam Alvey & Jennifer M. O. Geiger & Gregory D. Johnson & Marni G. Rolston & Daniel T. Kinsey & Neva Tall Bear, 2013. "Using Undergraduate Researchers to Build Vector and West Nile Virus Surveillance Capacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, July.
    15. Holly C. White & Katharine J. Ruskin & Alison Jolley & Nathan Flint & Debra M. Allen & Karen N. Pelletreau & Brian J. Olsen & Joan E. Ferrini-Mundy & John C. Volin, 2025. "Research Learning Experiences for First-Year Undergraduate Students: Belonging, Research Identity, and Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-30, May.
    16. Sara E. Grineski & Danielle X. Morales & Timothy W. Collins & Shawna Nadybal & Shaylynn Trego, 2022. "A US National Study of Barriers to Science Training Experienced by Undergraduate Students during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    17. KJE Hickman & Geoffrey Zahn, 2024. "Ten simple rules for leading a successful undergraduate-intensive research lab," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-8, April.
    18. Rishita Bhatt & Bernadette West & Sunita Chaudhary, 2020. "Biomedical career enrichment programs: Exploring women and minority participants’ motivators and outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Sophie Pierszalowski & Jana Bouwma-Gearhart & Lindsay Marlow, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under-Researched Factors for Students of Color," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-43, September.
    20. Deborah Faye Carter & Hyun Kyoung Ro & Benjamin Alcott & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2016. "Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(3), pages 363-393, May.
    21. Danielle X. Morales & Sara E. Grineski & Timothy W. Collins, 2017. "Faculty Motivation to Mentor Students Through Undergraduate Research Programs: A Study of Enabling and Constraining Factors," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(5), pages 520-544, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:356151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.