IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/brebwr/12021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Forschendes Lernen in der geographischen Hochschullehre

Author

Listed:
  • Bornemann, Janina

Abstract

Die Ursprünge des Forschenden Lernens liegen bereits Jahrhunderte zurück. Jedoch wurde das Konzept, Studierende in die Forschung an Universitäten einzubinden und sie "selber denken zu lassen" lange Zeit nicht als zielführend angesehen. Massenuniversitäten zielten auf frontale, lehrendenzentrierte Bildung und nicht auf individuelles Wachstum und eigenständigen Wissenserwerb ab. Erst seit Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts hat forschungsorientiertes Lernen, mit seiner Keimzelle in den USA, die Hochschullandschaften und Lehre weltweit verändert. In Deutschland hat die Kritik an der Bologna-Reform, unterstützt durch den Qualitätspakt Lehre, die Entwicklung von umfangreichen Projekten zu Forschendem Lernen befördert. Mit der Entwicklung von Lehrveranstaltungen zu Forschendem Lernen wurde vielerorts eine studierendenzentrierte Sichtweise auf die Lehre an Universitäten eingenommen und Studierende in die Forschungen der Institute eingebunden. Die neuen, "experimentierfreudigen" Lehrenden helfen Studierenden "besser" durch die Studieneingangsphase zu gelangen, selbstständig Wissen zu erwerben und frühzeitig eine fachliche Identität auszubilden. Dennoch bestehen, gerade durch die starre Konstruktion des Bachelor-Master-Systems, noch viele Hindernisse für Lehrveranstaltungen und Prüfungen zu Forschendem Lernen. Viele Projekte können nicht "zu Ende gedacht" (Hofhues/Mallwitz 2016) werden, da alternative Prüfungsformen nicht möglich erscheinen. Auch der aktuelle Digital Turn, welcher durch Corona noch einmal an Fahrt aufgenommen hat, stellt neue Herausforderungen an das Forschende Lernen an Universitäten.

Suggested Citation

  • Bornemann, Janina, 2021. "Forschendes Lernen in der geographischen Hochschullehre," Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsgeographie und Regionalentwicklung 1-2021, Universität Bremen, Institut für Geographie.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:brebwr:12021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/231395/1/1749387557.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen W. Bauer & Joan S. Bennett, 2003. "Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(2), pages 210-230, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamilton, Lynn & Mathews, Leah Greden & Grant, Richard & Wolf, Marianne McGarry, 2013. "The Value of Undergraduate Research: A Pilot Study of Agribusiness Alumni Perceptions," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149846, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Jalbert, Terrance, 2008. "Experiences in publishing peer-reviewed research with undergraduate accounting and finance students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 104-117.
    3. Parama Chaudhury & Christian Spielmann, 2016. "Let's Make a Movie! Introducing Economics With a Multimedia Project," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41, June.
    4. Kendra H Oliver & Christina Keeton & Roger Chalkley & Elizabeth Bowman, 2021. "Virtual Vanderbilt Summer Science Academy highlighted the opportunity to impact early STEMM students career knowledge through narrative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Katelyn M Cooper & Logan E Gin & Barierane Akeeh & Carolyn E Clark & Joshua S Hunter & Travis B Roderick & Deanna B Elliott & Luis A Gutierrez & Rebecca M Mello & Leilani D Pfeiffer & Rachel A Scott &, 2019. "Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Traci A Giuliano & Isham E Kimbell & Emily S Olson & Jennifer L Howell, 2022. "High impact: Examining predictors of faculty-undergraduate coauthored publication and presentation in psychology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Dawayne Whittington & Latricia E. Wallace & Cherilynn R. Shadding, 2017. "Proxies for Success: How the Application Process Correlates to PhD Pursuit for a Small Diversity Research Program," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:brebwr:12021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.regionalentwicklung.uni-bremen.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.