IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten simple rules for leading a successful undergraduate-intensive research lab

Author

Listed:
  • KJE Hickman
  • Geoffrey Zahn

Abstract

Participating in mentored research is an enormous benefit to undergraduate students. These immersive experiences can dramatically improve retention and completion rates, especially for students from traditionally underserved populations in STEM disciplines. Scientists typically do not receive any formal training in management or group dynamics before taking on the role of a lab head. Thus, peer forums and shared wisdom are crucial for developing the vision and skills involved with mentorship and leading a successful research lab. Faculty at any institution can help improve student outcomes and the success of their labs by thoughtfully including undergraduates in their research programs. Moreover, faculty at primarily undergraduate institutions have special challenges that are not often acknowledged or addressed in public discussions about best practices for running a lab. Here, we present 10 simple rules for fostering a successful undergraduate research lab. While much of the advice herein is applicable to mentoring undergraduates in any setting, it is especially tailored to the special circumstances found at primarily undergraduate institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • KJE Hickman & Geoffrey Zahn, 2024. "Ten simple rules for leading a successful undergraduate-intensive research lab," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011994
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011994
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011994&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie T. Jones & Amy E. L. Barlow & Merna Villarejo, 2010. "Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and Achievement in Biology," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(1), pages 82-115, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelyn Abagayle Boyd & Kelly Best Lazar, 2024. "Undergraduate Research Science Capital: Measuring capacity to engage in research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1007833 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Julie J. Park & Young K. Kim & Cinthya Salazar & Shannon Hayes, 2020. "Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 330-356, May.
    4. Anastasia Rogova & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Shine Chang & Kamisha H. Escoto & Kayce D. Solari Williams & Crystal Roberson & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Promoting Cancer Health Equity: A Qualitative Study of Mentee and Mentor Perspectives of a Training Program for Underrepresented Scholars in Cancer Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Katelyn M Cooper & Logan E Gin & Barierane Akeeh & Carolyn E Clark & Joshua S Hunter & Travis B Roderick & Deanna B Elliott & Luis A Gutierrez & Rebecca M Mello & Leilani D Pfeiffer & Rachel A Scott &, 2019. "Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Grant Hokit & Sam Alvey & Jennifer M. O. Geiger & Gregory D. Johnson & Marni G. Rolston & Daniel T. Kinsey & Neva Tall Bear, 2013. "Using Undergraduate Researchers to Build Vector and West Nile Virus Surveillance Capacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Holly C. White & Katharine J. Ruskin & Alison Jolley & Nathan Flint & Debra M. Allen & Karen N. Pelletreau & Brian J. Olsen & Joan E. Ferrini-Mundy & John C. Volin, 2025. "Research Learning Experiences for First-Year Undergraduate Students: Belonging, Research Identity, and Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Sue Ellen DeChenne-Peters & John F Rakus & Amy D Parente & Tamara L Mans & Rebecca Eddy & Nicole Galport & Courtney Koletar & Joseph J Provost & J Ellis Bell & Jessica K Bell, 2023. "Length of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) impacts student learning and attitudinal outcomes: A study of the Malate dehydrogenase CUREs Community (MCC)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-33, March.
    9. Sara E. Grineski & Danielle X. Morales & Timothy W. Collins & Shawna Nadybal & Shaylynn Trego, 2022. "A US National Study of Barriers to Science Training Experienced by Undergraduate Students during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Dawayne Whittington & Latricia E. Wallace & Cherilynn R. Shadding, 2017. "Proxies for Success: How the Application Process Correlates to PhD Pursuit for a Small Diversity Research Program," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    11. Rishita Bhatt & Bernadette West & Sunita Chaudhary, 2020. "Biomedical career enrichment programs: Exploring women and minority participants’ motivators and outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Sophie Pierszalowski & Jana Bouwma-Gearhart & Lindsay Marlow, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under-Researched Factors for Students of Color," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-43, September.
    13. Deborah Faye Carter & Hyun Kyoung Ro & Benjamin Alcott & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2016. "Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(3), pages 363-393, May.
    14. Danielle X. Morales & Sara E. Grineski & Timothy W. Collins, 2017. "Faculty Motivation to Mentor Students Through Undergraduate Research Programs: A Study of Enabling and Constraining Factors," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(5), pages 520-544, August.
    15. Hochman, Gal & Jin, Yanhong, 2025. "Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research: From Cross-Discipline Programs to Published Articles," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.