IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i66p665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Contexts in the Process of Choosing a University Product

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru Miron

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Raluca Ecaterina Brandabur

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniel Nicolae Maita

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Flavius Cosmin Darie

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dumitru Goldbach

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ion-Danu? Lixandru

    (Valahia University of T rgovi?te, T rgovi?te, Romania)

Abstract

In the current global context, organisations are compelled to reposition themselves in the distribution chain due to changes in consumer behaviour. Consumers no longer simply seek products and services; instead, they are pursuing the maximisation of satisfaction promised by their providers. The authors of this article have focused their analytical efforts on highlighting specific aspects of the diverse challenges that consumers must find optimal solutions to at the time of purchase decision. Within this dynamic framework, intellectual capital plays an increasingly important role, its core components being human capital, relational capital, and structural capital. Addressing the human capital component, the authors of this study have directed their analytical approach toward the key determinants of young people's decisions to opt for specific study programmes, aiming to explain how educational offerings can be personalised and adapted. Methodologically, an econometric model is employed, allowing universities to conduct a stakeholder analysis to gather information to determine a matrix of the expressed interest and influence power of various categories of interests in societal terms. The paper presents the results of testing the foundations of students' choices for a particular university-level study programme. Furthermore, the research sought to establish the desirable level of econometric robustness of the basic vectors in the decision-making process regarding the selection of a specific set of competencies and cognitive skills promised by the study programmes. Based on the operationalisation of the specific methodological tools, a panel of tools has been constructed for universities to attempt to meet the expectations of future students. Candidates and students can also use these tools to find ways to optimise resources related to the creation, modification, and promotion of study programmes through the planning of competitive strategies and simultaneous action as promoters of social responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru Miron & Raluca Ecaterina Brandabur & Daniel Nicolae Maita & Flavius Cosmin Darie & Dumitru Goldbach & Ion-Danu? Lixandru, 2024. "The Influence of Contexts in the Process of Choosing a University Product," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(66), pages 665-665, Aprilie.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:66:p:665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3305.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intellectual capital; context; informed decision-making process; study programme; sustainable education.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • P46 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:66:p:665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.