IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v8y1994i4p111-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Allocation of Resources in the Presence of Indivisibilities

Author

Listed:
  • Herbert Scarf

Abstract

A major theme of economic theory is that optimality, at the level of the firm or the economy as a whole, can be reached by profit maximization using competitive prices. The conclusion requires the assumption that the production possibility set be convex and is not valid if production displays economies of scale based on significant indivisibilities. The paper provides a specific quantity test for detecting optimality in the presence of indivisibilities and suggests that it may be useful to view the large firm as an algorithm for solving programming problems in which some of the variables assume integral values.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert Scarf, 1994. "The Allocation of Resources in the Presence of Indivisibilities," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 111-128, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:111-28
    Note: DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.4.111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jep.8.4.111
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert E. Scarf, 1990. "Mathematical Programming and Economic Theory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 377-385, June.
    2. László Lovász & Herbert E. Scarf, 1992. "The Generalized Basis Reduction Algorithm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 751-764, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araoz, Veronica & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2011. "Semi-Lagrangean approach for price discovery in markets with non-convexities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 411-417, October.
    2. K. Aardal & R. E. Bixby & C. A. J. Hurkens & A. K. Lenstra & J. W. Smeltink, 2000. "Market Split and Basis Reduction: Towards a Solution of the Cornuéjols-Dawande Instances," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 192-202, August.
    3. James Markusen & Thomas Rutherford, 1994. "Discrete plant-location decisions in an applied general-equilibrium model of trade liberalization," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 130(1), pages 133-151, March.
    4. Navid Azizan & Yu Su & Krishnamurthy Dvijotham & Adam Wierman, 2020. "Optimal Pricing in Markets with Nonconvex Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 480-496, March.
    5. Cheng Lu & Zhibin Deng & Shu-Cherng Fang & Qingwei Jin & Wenxun Xing, 0. "Fast computation of global solutions to the single-period unit commitment problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    6. A Drexl & K Jørnsten, 2007. "Reflections about pseudo-dual prices in combinatorial auctions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(12), pages 1652-1659, December.
    7. Soo, Kwok Tong, 2017. "Indivisibilities in the Ricardian model of trade," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 311-317.
    8. Liao, Chao-ning & Önal, Hayri & Chen, Ming-Hsiang, 2009. "Average shadow price and equilibrium price: A case study of tradable pollution permit markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1207-1213, August.
    9. Karen Aardal & Arjen K. Lenstra, 2004. "Hard Equality Constrained Integer Knapsacks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 724-738, August.
    10. Xin Shi & Alberto J. Lamadrid L. & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2021. "Revenue Adequate Prices for Chance-Constrained Electricity Markets with Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Papers 2105.01233, arXiv.org.
    11. Bjørndal, Mette & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2008. "Equilibrium prices supported by dual price functions in markets with non-convexities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 768-789, November.
    12. Karen Aardal & Cor A. J. Hurkens & Arjen K. Lenstra, 2000. "Solving a System of Linear Diophantine Equations with Lower and Upper Bounds on the Variables," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 427-442, August.
    13. Chen, Shu-Heng, 2012. "Varieties of agents in agent-based computational economics: A historical and an interdisciplinary perspective," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-25.
    14. Ramteen Sioshansi and Ashlin Tignor, 2012. "Do Centrally Committed Electricity Markets Provide Useful Price Signals?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    15. Aardal, K.I. & van Hoesel, S., 1995. "Polyhedral Techniques in Combinatorial Optimization," Other publications TiSEM ed028a07-eb6a-4c8d-8f21-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Leimbach, Marian & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2007. "Technological spillovers within multi-region models: Intertemporal optimization beyond the Negishi approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 272-294, March.
    17. Holmberg, Pär & Tangerås, Thomas & Ahlqvist, Victor, 2018. "Central- versus Self-Dispatch in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 1257, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 27 Mar 2019.
    18. Nicolás Garrido, 2004. "The Desirable Organizational Structure for Evolutionary Firms in Static Landscapes," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2‐3), pages 318-331, May.
    19. Alexander Bockmayr & Friedrich Eisenbrand, 2001. "Cutting Planes and the Elementary Closure in Fixed Dimension," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 304-312, May.
    20. Håkan J. Holm, 2004. "Rights and Decentralized Computation," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2‐3), pages 290-317, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:8:y:1994:i:4:p:111-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.