Achievement Differences on Multiple-Choice and Essay Tests in Economics
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- repec:taf:oaefxx:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:1115618 is not listed on IDEAS
- Zapechelnyuk, Andriy, 2015. "An axiomatization of multiple-choice test scoring," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 24-27.
- Zhou Yang & Martin Tackie, 2016. "Risk Preference and Student Behavior on Multiple-Choice Exams," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 58-67.
- W. Doyle Smith, 2002. "Applying Angelo's Teacher's Dozen to Undergraduate Introductory Economics Classes: A Call for Greater Interactive Learning," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 539-549, Fall.
- Bagues, Manuel & Perez-Villadoniga, Maria J., 2012.
"Do recruiters prefer applicants with similar skills? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 12-20.
- Bagues, Manuel F. & Pérez Villadóniga, María José, 2009. "Do recruiters prefer applicants with similar skills? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb090562, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
- W. Robert Reed & Stephen Hickson, 2011.
"More Evidence on the Use of Constructed-Response Questions in Principles of Economics Classes,"
International Review of Economic Education,
Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(2), pages 28-49.
- Stephen Hickson & W. Robert Reed, 2011. "More Evidence on the Use of Constructed-Response Questions in Principles of Economics Classes," Working Papers in Economics 11/02, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
- P. Everaert & N. Arthur, 2012. "Constructed-response versus multiple choice: the impact on performance in combination with gender," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/777, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
More about this item
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:84:y:1994:i:2:p:193-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jane Voros) or (Michael P. Albert). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.