IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/artoaj/v25y2020i1p40-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biologicals The New Green Revolution or Snake Oil for Ag Reflections from Agricultural Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Doll JE

    (Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, USA)

  • Ulbrich TC

    (WK Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, USA)

  • Reimer AP

    (National Wildlife Foundation, Ann Arbor, USA)

Abstract

Modern agricultural systems are increasingly reliant on inputs and technological developments from private industry. In recent years, there has been a rapid growth in the market for inputs (seed treatments and inoculants, foliar sprays, etc.) derived from biological (especially microbial) origins, so-called biological products. Farmer use of these emerging technologies and farmer advisors views of these products have not been systematically investigated. We report an exploratory effort to understand this emerging market and agricultural stakeholders perspectives on these new products. This research revealed significant communication and information disconnects between agricultural stakeholders and the farmers with whom they work.

Suggested Citation

  • Doll JE & Ulbrich TC & Reimer AP, 2020. "Biologicals The New Green Revolution or Snake Oil for Ag Reflections from Agricultural Stakeholders," Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 40-43, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:artoaj:v:25:y:2020:i:1:p:40-43
    DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.25.556293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/artoaj/pdf/ARTOAJ.MS.ID.556293.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/artoaj/ARTOAJ.MS.ID.556293.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.25.556293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart, D. & Denny, R.C.H. & Houser, M. & Reimer, A.P. & Marquart-Pyatt, S., 2018. "Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 289-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Houser, 2022. "Does adopting a nitrogen best management practice reduce nitrogen fertilizer rates?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 79-94, March.
    2. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    3. Matthew Houser & Ryan Gunderson & Diana Stuart & Riva C. H. Denny, 2020. "How farmers “repair” the industrial agricultural system," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 983-997, December.
    4. Nathan J. Shipley & William P. Stewart & Carena J. Riper, 2022. "Negotiating agricultural change in the Midwestern US: seeking compatibility between farmer narratives of efficiency and legacy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1465-1476, December.
    5. Yoder, Landon & Houser, Matthew & Bruce, Analena & Sullivan, Abigail & Farmer, James, 2021. "Are climate risks encouraging cover crop adoption among farmers in the southern Wabash River Basin?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Pan, Dan & Zhang, Ning & Kong, Fanbin, 2021. "Does it matter who gives information? The impact of information sources on farmers’ pesticide use in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:artoaj:v:25:y:2020:i:1:p:40-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.