IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v4y2022i1p233-245.html

Impact of Land-use Change on Agricultural Production & Accuracy Assessment through Confusion Matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sajid, Muhammad Mohsin,Tabasam Jamal, Muhammad Mobeen,Abdur Rehman, Anum Rafique

    (Department of Geography, Govt.Graduate College Chowk Azam, Layyah. Department of Geography, Govt. Sadiq Egerton Graduate College, Bahawalpur. Department of Geography, University of Punjab. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sargodha. Department ofGeography, Govt. Associate College for Women, Mela Mandi, Sargodha)

Abstract

Land modification and its allied resources have progressively become a severe problem presently pulling the worldwide attention and now it rests at the central point of the conservation of the environment and sustainability. The present research aimed to examine the land-use changes and their impact on agricultural production using remote sensing and GIS techniques over the study area that comprised of Tehsil Shorkot, District Jhang, Punjab, Pakistan. Images were pre-processed by using the Arc GIS and ERDAS Imagine 15 software for stacking of the layers, sub-setting, and mosaicking of the satellite bands. After the pre-processing of the images, supervised image classification scheme was applied by employing a maximum likelihood algorithm to recognize the land-use changes which have been observed in the area under study. The area under water was occupied 9.6 km2 in 2010 that increased to 21.04 km2 in 2015 and decreased to 19.4 km2in 2020. Built-up land was 16.6 km2 in 2010 that increased to 19.4 km2 in 2015 and 26.8 km2 in 2020. The total area under vegetation was computed as 513.2 km2 in 2010 that increased to 601.6km2 in 2015 and further increased to 717.7 km2in 2020. Forest land use showed decreasing trend as the covered area in 2010 was occupied 90.8 km2 that decreased to 86.7 km2 in 2015 and further decreased to 61.84 km2 in 2020. In 2010, barren land use was occupied 528.54 km2 that considerably decreased to 429.64 km2 in 2015 further decreased to 333.1 km2 in 2020. Barren land drastically decreased into watered, built-up, and vegetation land uses. The findings of this study will be helpful for the future conservation of various land-use types, urban and regional planning, and an increase in agricultural production of various crops in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sajid, Muhammad Mohsin,Tabasam Jamal, Muhammad Mobeen,Abdur Rehman, Anum Rafique, 2022. "Impact of Land-use Change on Agricultural Production & Accuracy Assessment through Confusion Matrix," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 4(1), pages 233-245, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:233-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/84/608
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/84
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiran Han & Chengfeng Yang & Jinping Song, 2015. "Scenario Simulation and the Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Nguyen Thi Huyen & Le Hoang Tu & Nguyen Duy Liem & Vo Ngoc Quyn Tram & Duong Ngoc Minh & Nguyen Kim Loi, 2017. "Assessing Impacts of Land Use and Climate Change on Soil and Water Resources in the Srepok Watershed, Central Highland of Vietnam," Agriculture and Development Discussion Paper Series 2017-2, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA).
    3. Harrison, Matthew T. & Jackson, Tom & Cullen, Brendan R. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Ho, Christie & Cummins, Leo & Eckard, Richard J., 2014. "Increasing ewe genetic fecundity improves whole-farm production and reduces greenhouse gas emissions intensities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 23-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harrison, Matthew T. & McSweeney, Chris & Tomkins, Nigel W. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-146.
    2. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Lingyu Li, 2018. "Evaluation and Prediction of City Sustainability Using MCDM and Stochastic Simulation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Azher Hussain Syed & Bijoy Mitra & Mohammad Shahedur Rahman & Omer Rehman Reshi & Syed Masiur Rahman & Asif Raihan, 2026. "A novel geospatial framework for projecting sea level rise impacts on the Western Arabian Gulf: insights from nighttime light and cellular automata modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 122(1), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Zaheer Abbas & Guang Yang & Yuanjun Zhong & Yaolong Zhao, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Future Scenario of LULC Using the CA-ANN Approach: A Case Study of the Greater Bay Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Yunfeng Hu & Batu Nacun, 2018. "An Analysis of Land-Use Change and Grassland Degradation from a Policy Perspective in Inner Mongolia, China, 1990–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Toro-Mujica, Paula & Aguilar, Claudio & Vera, Raúl R. & Bas, Fernando, 2017. "Carbon footprint of sheep production systems in semi-arid zone of Chile: A simulation-based approach of productive scenarios and precipitation patterns," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 22-38.
    8. Bernard Fosu Frimpong & Frank Molkenthin, 2021. "Tracking Urban Expansion Using Random Forests for the Classification of Landsat Imagery (1986–2015) and Predicting Urban/Built-Up Areas for 2025: A Study of the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Ibra Lebbe Mohamed Zahir & Sunethra Thennakoon & Rev. Pinnawala Sangasumana & Jayani Herath & Buddhika Madurapperuma & Atham Lebbe Iyoob, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Land-Use Changes of Batticaloa Municipal Council in Sri Lanka from 1990 to 2030 Using Land Change Modeler," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-12, September.
    10. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Kaini, S. & Harrison, M. T. & Gardner, T. & Nepal, Santosh & Sharma, A. K., 2022. "The impacts of climate change on the irrigation water demand, grain yield, and biomass yield of wheat crop in Nepal," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(17):27.
    12. Chunliu Gao & Deqiang Cheng & Javed Iqbal & Shunyu Yao, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Prediction of the Great Yellow River Region (GYRR) Land Cover and the Relationship Analysis with Mountain Hazards," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Pragya Pradhan & Trang Thi Huyen Pham & Sangam Shrestha & Ho Huu Loc & Edward Park, 2022. "Projecting the impact of human activities and climate change on water resources in the transboundary Sre Pok River Basin," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Luoman Pu & Jiuchun Yang & Lingxue Yu & Changsheng Xiong & Fengqin Yan & Yubo Zhang & Shuwen Zhang, 2021. "Simulating Land-Use Changes and Predicting Maize Potential Yields in Northeast China for 2050," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Yifeng Hou & Yaning Chen & Zhi Li & Yang Wang, 2023. "Changes in Land Use Pattern and Structure under the Rapid Urbanization of the Tarim River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Shaikh Shamim Hasan & Xiangzheng Deng & Zhihui Li & Dongdong Chen, 2017. "Projections of Future Land Use in Bangladesh under the Background of Baseline, Ecological Protection and Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Alcock, Douglas J. & Harrison, Matthew T. & Rawnsley, Richard P. & Eckard, Richard J., 2015. "Can animal genetics and flock management be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also maintain productivity of wool-producing enterprises?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 25-34.
    18. Juan Wang & Jiaqi Lv & Wenping Zhang & Tianqian Chen & Yang Yang & Jinjin Wu, 2022. "Land-Use Pattern Evaluation Using GeoSOS-FLUS in National Territory Spatial Planning: A Case Study of Changzhi City, Shanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Xiuyan Zhao & Changhong Miao, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Simulation of Land Use in Metropolitan Areas: A Case of the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Muhammad Tauhidur Rahman & Adel S. Aldosary & Md. Golam Mortoja, 2017. "Modeling Future Land Cover Changes and Their Effects on the Land Surface Temperatures in the Saudi Arabian Eastern Coastal City of Dammam," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:233-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.