IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1063-d1654975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits and Trade-Offs from Land Use and Land Cover Changes Under Different Scenarios in the Coastal Delta of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thi Hong Diep

    (College of Environment and Natural Resources, Can Tho University, Can Tho City 94115, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Trong Nguyen

    (College of Environment and Natural Resources, Can Tho University, Can Tho City 94115, Vietnam)

  • Phan Kieu Diem

    (College of Environment and Natural Resources, Can Tho University, Can Tho City 94115, Vietnam)

  • Can Trong Nguyen

    (Environment Centre, Charles University, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) in coastal areas is critical in shaping the ecological systems, regional economy, and livelihood of indigenous communities. This study analyzes LULC changes (LULCC) in Soc Trang Province, Vietnam Mekong Delta, from 2010 to 2020 and simulates future LULC for 2030 under four scenarios: natural growth (business as usual, BAU), climate change challenges, profit optimization, and adaptation strategies. Satellite-based LULC maps and geospatial datasets were integrated into a LULC simulation model based on a Markov Chain and Cellular Automata to predict LULC in 2030 under disparate scenarios. Simultaneously, this study also estimates economic values and ecosystem service values as proxies to evaluate benefits and trade-offs between the scenarios. The research findings reveal that the critical LULCC observed during 2010–2020 are transitions from triple rice crops to double rice crops, rice–shrimp to brackish aquaculture, and expansion of perennial plantations. These transitional trends will persist at a modest rate under the BAU scenario in 2030. The climate change challenge scenario will intervene up to 24.2% of the total area, with double rice crops reaching the most extensive area compared to other scenarios, about 106,047 ha. The profit optimization scenario will affect 16.03% of the total area, focusing on aquaculture expansion to the maximum shared proportion of 34% (approximately 57,000 ha). Adaptive solutions will emphasize reducing triple rice crops while expanding double rice crops and reviving rice–shrimp to different extents depending on development pathways. Economic evaluations show a growth trend across scenarios, with maximum returns under profit optimization. Yet, ecosystem service values notably highlight ecological trade-offs, raising concerns about balancing economic benefits and ecological trade-offs in land use planning. The research findings recommend a comprehensive and multitarget approach to land use planning that integrates ecosystem services into initial assessments to balance benefits and trade-offs in coastal areas commonly affected by LULCC. By adopting well-informed and strategic land use plans that minimize ecological and social impacts, local sustainability and resilience to climate change can be significantly enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thi Hong Diep & Nguyen Trong Nguyen & Phan Kieu Diem & Can Trong Nguyen, 2025. "Benefits and Trade-Offs from Land Use and Land Cover Changes Under Different Scenarios in the Coastal Delta of Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1063-:d:1654975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1063-:d:1654975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.