IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v33y2020i1no5p71-82.html

Platform Capitalism – Boon or Bane to Society? رأسمالية المنصات – نعمة أم نقمة على المجتمع؟

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulkader Cassim Mahomedy

    (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa)

Abstract

In this essay, the rise of platform capitalism and its claims to a utopian economic world is explored. Using the tawḥīdī worldview, I trace its emergence within the context of the growth of modern capitalism itself. The study reveals that there are certain core elements within the institutional framework of the modern economy that empowers capitalism to hegemonize society and its structures. In its drive to create and capture value, it grows rapidly, but destroys other institutions, including its own in the process. However, it always protects its inner core so that it is able to reincarnate itself in some new form. Platforms and its basket of newly emerging technologies thus represent this next frontier in the capitalist agenda, subsequent to its spectacular collapse in 2007-2008. Though some have hailed the emergence of platform capitalism as the dawn of a new age in material prosperity for all, this article demonstrates that this claim is nothing but subterfuge to deceive the world into embracing the digital age wholeheartedly. Global capitalism recognizes only one agenda: the need to feed its insatiable appetite to accumulate material wealth; all else is irrelevant. It is only an ethically-based Islamic system of economy, which embraces the precept of tawḥīd , i.e., an ontology and epistemology of systemic oneness in everything, that can offer hope to the world at large. في هذا المقال، يتم استكشاف ظهور رأسمالية المنصات ودعوى تطورها إلى عالم اقتصادي مثالي. باستخدام نظرة العالم التوحيدي، أتتبع ظهورها في سياق نمو الرأسمالية الحديثة نفسها. تكشف الدراسة أن هناك بعض العناصر الأساسية في الإطار المؤسسي للاقتصاد الحديث التي تمكن الرأسمالية من الهيمنة على المجتمع وهيكلته. في سعيها لإنشاء القيمة والسيطرة عليها، فإنها تنمو بسرعة، ولكنها تدمر المؤسسات الأخرى، بما في ذلك مؤسساتها نفسها. ومع ذلك، فإنها تحمي دائمًا جوهره الداخلي حتى يتمكن من إعادة تشكيل نفسه بشكل جديد. تمثل المنصات وسلة التكنولوجيات الحديثة الناشئة عنها الأبعاد الجديدة في جدول أعمال الرأسمالية، بعد انهيارها المذهل في 2007- 2008م. على الرغم من أن البعض قد أشاد بظهور رأسمالية المنصات باعتبارها فجر عصر جديد في الازدهار المادي للجميع، إلا أن هذا المقال يوضح أن هذا الادعاء ليس سوى خدعة لخداع العالم في تبني العصر الرقمي بكل إخلاص. تعترف الرأسمالية العالمية بجدول أعمال واحد فقط: الحاجة إلى إشباع شهيتها الغير متناهية لتراكم الثروة المادية؛ كل شيء آخر غير ليس له أهمية. إنه لا يمكن لأي نظام أن يقدم الأمل للعالم بأسره في مواجهة هذه التحديات سوى نظام الاقتصاد الإسلامي القائم على أساس أخلاقي، والذي يحتضن مبدأ التوحيد، أي علم الوجود ونظرية المعرفة للتوحيد المنهجي في كل شيء.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulkader Cassim Mahomedy, 2020. "Platform Capitalism – Boon or Bane to Society? رأسمالية المنصات – نعمة أم نقمة على المجتمع؟," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 71-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:33:y:2020:i:1:no:5:p:71-82
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.33-1.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153867_33-01-05-Abdul%20Qadir-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.33-1.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Reardon, 2020. "Platform Capitalism, Big Data, and Data Ethics رأسمالية المنصات، البيانات الضخمة، وأخلاقيات البيانات," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 59-69, January.
    2. Abdulkader Cassim Mahomedy, 2013. "Islamic economics: still in search of an identity," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 40(6), pages 556-578, May.
    3. William Lazonick & Mariana Mazzucato, 2013. "The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards ?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 1093-1128, August.
    4. Burton-Jones, Alan, 2001. "Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199242542.
    5. Abdulkader Cassim Mahomedy, 2013. "Islamic economics: still in search of an identity," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(6), pages 556-578, May.
    6. Magdoff, Harry, 1970. "Militarism and Imperialism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 237-242, May.
    7. Masudul Alam Choudhury, 2007. "The Universal Paradigm and the Islamic World-System:Economy, Society, Ethics and Science," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6344, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Çokgezen, 2016. "Islamic economics in real life: Do Muslims give more than the others?," Working Papers hal-01349872, HAL.
    2. Mohd Mahyudi & Enizahura Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Method and Substance of Islamic Economics Revisited إعادة النظر في منهجية ومرتكزات الاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 31(2), pages 33-50, July.
    3. Burhan Ali Shah & Ghulam Shabbir Khan Niazi & Abdul Majid, 2016. "Employees' Perceptions about Islamic Banking and its Growth Potential in Pakistan," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 8(1), pages 53-76, April.
    4. Jo Michell, 2014. "A Steindlian account of the distribution of corporate profits and leverage: A stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model with agent-based microfoundations," Working Papers PKWP1412, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    5. Syed Nazim Ali, 2020. "Big Data, Islamic Finance, and Sustainable Development Goals البيانات الضخمة، التمويل الإسلامي، وأهداف التنمية المستدامة," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 83-90, January.
    6. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    7. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-03987909 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2022. "Three Decades of Research on Innovation and Inequality: Causal Scenarios, Explanatory Factors, and Suggestions," Working Papers 60, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2022.
    9. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    10. Anne Stevenot & Loris Guery & Geoffrey Wood & Chris Brewster, 2018. "Country of Origin Effects and New Financial Actors: Private Equity Investment and Work and Employment Practices of French Firms," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 859-881, December.
    11. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2016. "Graduation and sell-out strategies in the Alternative Investment Market," Discussion Papers 4_2016, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    12. Efstathios Tapinos & Graham Leask & Mike Brown, 2023. "Perceived environmental turbulence and corporate strategy: The case of the UK recession," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    13. Greg Schrock & Nichola Lowe, 2021. "Inclusive innovation editorial: The promise of inclusive innovation," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 181-186, May.
    14. Andersson, Johnn & Hellsmark, Hans & Sandén, Björn A., 2018. "Shaping factors in the emergence of technological innovations: The case of tidal kite technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 191-208.
    15. Pauline Debanes, 2018. "Layering the developmental state away?," Working Papers halshs-01800489, HAL.
    16. Mario Pianta & Matteo Lucchese, 2020. "Rethinking the European Green Deal," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 633-641, December.
    17. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2021. "Innovation Systems and Income Inequality: In Search of Causal Mechanisms," Working Papers 56, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Nov 2021.
    18. Giovanni DOSI & Maria Enrica VIRGILLITO, 2019. "Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio‐economic trends," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 593-625, December.
    19. Stek, Pieter E. & van Geenhuizen, Marina S., 2016. "The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-70.
    20. Nicodemus Osei Owusu ˆ—€, 2016. "Collaborative Knowledge Management: Examining The Challenges In The Rural Banking Industry In The Eastern Region Of Ghana," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 2(3), pages 111-120.
    21. Turaj S. Faran & Lennart Olsson, 2018. "Geoengineering: neither economical, nor ethical—a risk–reward nexus analysis of carbon dioxide removal," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 63-77, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • P1 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies
    • P4 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:33:y:2020:i:1:no:5:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.