Zunehmende Konfliktregulierung durch Arbeitsgerichte? Eine ökonomische Analyse der Häufigkeit von Kündigungsschutzprozessen
Abstract
Der vorliegende Beitrag argumentiert, daß die regionale Arbeitsmarktsituation (Zugänge in Arbeitslosigkeit und Zugänge an freien Stellen) die Entscheidung von Arbeitnehmern, eine Kündigungsschutzklage einzureichen, deutlich beeinflußt. Regressionsanalysen mit amtlichen Daten für die westlichen Bundesländer im Zeitraum 1964-1996 zeigen in Abweichung von früheren Befunden (Falke et al. 1981), daß die Häufigkeit von Kündigungsschutzprozessen deutlich und signifikant mit Unterschieden in der regionalen Arbeitsmarktsituation und mit deren zeitlichen Veränderungen erklärt werden kann. Die Modellschätzungen zeigen außerdem, daß das autonome Niveau der relativen Klagehäufigkeit, das nicht auf die Arbeitsmarktsituation zurückgeführt werden kann, im Beobachtungszeitraum gestiegen ist. Denkbare Ursachen dieser Klagenflut werden abschließend diskutiert. -- This paper argues that regional labour market conditions (the number of entries into unemployment and the number of new vacancies) will strongly influence whether dismissed employees take legal action against their employer (Kündigungsschutzklage). Regression analyses with regional official data for western Germany at the level of the federal states (Bundesländer), covering the 1964-1996 period, give support to this proposition: Diverging from earlier results (Falke et al. 1981), the number of new cases on (allegedly) unfair dismissals before the local labour courts can be explained, to a considerable degree, by the regional labour market variables and by changes in these variables. The empirical estimates also reveal that the autonomous level of new cases on dismissals has increased over time, even controlling for the labour market conditions. The paper discusses several explanations for this increase.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community (IAAEG), University of Trier in its series Quint-Essenzen with number 56.Length:
Date of creation: 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:iaaegq:56
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Campus II, D-54286 Trier
Phone: +49+651/201-4741
Fax: +49+651/201-4742
Email:
Web page: http://www.iaaeg.de/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords:References
References listed on IDEASPlease report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Cooter, Robert D & Rubinfeld, Daniel L, 1989. "Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 1067-97, September.
- Sarah Brown & Bernd Frick & John Sessions, 1997. "Unemployment, Vacancies and Unfair Dismissals," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 11(2), pages 329-349, 06.
- Sesselmeier, Werner, 1997. "(Rez.:) Frick, B.: Mitbestimmung und Personalfluktuation: zur Wirtschaftlichkeit der bundesdeutschen Betriebsverfassung im internationalen Vergleich. - München: Hampp, 1997," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute of Economics (VWL) 7661, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute of Economics (VWL).
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- Berger, Helge & Neugart, Michael, 2011.
"Labor courts, nomination bias, and unemployment in Germany,"
European Journal of Political Economy,
Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 659-673.
- Helge Berger & Michael Neugart, 2006. "Labor Courts, Nomination Bias, and Unemployment in Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 1752, CESifo Group Munich.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iaaegq:56For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

