Joseph Mullat (assoc. Prof., Economic Division, Tallinn Technical University, 1979 – 1980)
Abstract
It is now almost a common truth that society needs to avoid environment contamination or damage become significant for nature protection programs of the government and wild life preservation efforts. A possible outcome of such efforts might occasionally be a voluntary solution, which results that some industries are keyed up to find a break not to participate in environment protection. In the following we blow things out of all proportions, but the reader may found it informative to trace the interaction of interests between companies and environment protection agency, which takes into account the nature/content of industry activities. Contrary to the efficiency of a voluntary solution, what our solution is not, we still hope that we are at right advancing in the direction of self governing decision-making process.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: