This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Production of collective knowledge: some evidence from european metropolitan areas

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Consoli Davide
Patrucco Pier Paolo () (University of Turin)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Technological knowledge can be analyzed as a collective good since it is the result of systemic dynamics that make possible the access, accumulation and diffusion of interdependent bits of localized technological knowledge among complementary actors. Interactive behaviors and shared learning are the determinants of such collective character highlighting the need for effective communication opportunities and channels. Technological communication relies upon favorable social and institutional conditions which can find in the regional, and especially urban innovation space the proper environment to take place. In cities the opportunities for and actual implementation of technological communication find in social proximity the suitable factor to take advantage from the existing structural variety. Social proximity can enhance the quality of personal and collective relations, in turn accounting for low free-riding, reciprocity and thus repeated interactions based on trust which underpin effective communication of knowledge. Under these circumstances knowledge circulation emerges as the crucial factor in the generation of new technological knowledge and eventually innovation. Technological knowledge and the eventual introduction of innovation are now understood as the results of a cumulative process of recombination of different, preexisting bits of knowledge embodied in a variety of actors which can be effective only when and if the appropriate circulative conditions have been implemented. Knowledge-intensive-businessservices (KIBS) play a major role in fostering the rate of knowledge circulation and therefore the overall rate of knowledge production since they operate as intermediary actors in knowledge exchanges, sustaining the development of (quasi)markets for knowledge and therefore enhancing the tradability of knowledge. KIBS are drivers for the creation and circulation of general purpose knowledge (GPK, drown by analogy with general purpose technology) and allow the transformation of such GPK into both idiosyncratic and generic knowledge, and their accumulation over time, even if under specific conditions concerning the costs of appropriation and diffusion of specific and generic knowledge respectively. Finally and most important, the dynamics of collective technological knowledge cum KIBS c1early show that the traditional Arrovian trade-off between knowledge generation and knowledge circulation is still most relevant to the economics of innovation and yet can help to qualify some of its implications. When technological knowledge can be analyzed as a collective good because it is the result of the cumulative recombination of previously existing and dispersed bits of generic and specific knowledge, and such recombination is constrained because of technical and geographical factors, cities and KIBS provide appropriate conditions to support both individual incentives to innovate brought about by higher factor productivity and the social welfare associated with larger diffusion of knowledge.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.de.unito.it/web/member/segreteria/WP/Momigliano/2004/2_WP_Momigliano.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Turin in its series Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis" LEI & BRICK - Laboratorio di economia dell'innovazione "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo Alberto. WP series with number 200402.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:uto:labeco:200402

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.unito.it/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Carlo Lucchesi).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Kremer, Michael, 1993. "The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 551-75, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 1998. "Technological enclaves and industrial districts: An analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe," ERSA conference papers ersa98p461, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Malerba, Franco, 1992. "Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical Change," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(413), pages 845-59, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Ina Drejer, 2002. "Business Services as a Production Factor," Economic Systems Research, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 389-405, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Audretsch, David B & Feldman, Maryann P, 1996. "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 630-40, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Metcalfe, J S, 2001. "Institutions and Progress," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 561-86, September.
  7. Martin L. Weitzman, 1998. "Recombinant Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 113(2), pages 331-360, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  8. Paula E. Stephan, 1996. "The Economics of Science," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1199-1235, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Timothy F. Bresnahan & Manuel Trajtenberg, 1995. "General Purpose Technologies "Engines of Growth?"," NBER Working Papers 4148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Brian J. Loasby, 2000. "Market institutions and economic evolution," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 297-309. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Maskell, Peter & Malmberg, Anders, 1999. "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 167-85, March.
    Other versions:
  12. Richardson, G B, 1972. "The Organisation of Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(327), pages 883-96, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Patel, Pari, 1995. "Localised Production of Technology for Global Markets," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 141-53, February.
  14. Klepper, Steven, 1997. "Industry Life Cycles," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 145-81.
  15. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 1998. "International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations," NBER Working Papers 6507, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  16. Richard N. Langlois & Metin M. Cosgel, 1996. "The Organization of Consumption," Working papers 1996-07, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  17. Antonelli, Cristiano, 1997. "The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 643-675, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  18. John A. Mathews, 2003. "Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource-based view," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 115-145, February.
  19. Ashish Arora & Andrea Fosfuri & Alfonso Gambardella, 2004. "Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262511819.
  20. Quere, Michel, 1994. "Basic research inside the firm: Lessons from an in-depth case study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 413-424, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  21. Gaffard Jean Luc & Quéré Michel & Antonelli Cristiano, 2002. "Interactive learning and technological knowledge: the localised character of innovation processes," Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis" LEI & BRICK - Laboratorio di economia dell'innovazione "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo 200204, University of Turin. [Downloadable!]
  22. Allen, Robert C., 1983. "Collective invention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  23. John Cantwell, Simona Iammarino, 2000. "Multinational Corporations and the Location of Technological Innovation in the UK Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 317-332, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  24. Freeman, Chris, 1995. "The 'National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 5-24, February.
  25. Patrucco Pier Paolo, 2002. "The emergence of technology systems: Knowledge production and distribution in the case of the Emilian plastics district," Dipartimento di Economia "S. Cognetti de Martiis" LEI & BRICK - Laboratorio di economia dell'innovazione "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio Carlo 200206, University of Turin. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  26. Russo, Margherita, 1985. "Technical change and the industrial district: The role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 329-343, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  27. Feldman, Maryann P, 2001. "The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 861-91, December.
  28. Menard, Claude, 1995. "Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 161-182, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  29. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-96, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  30. Olsson, Ola & Frey, Bruno S, 2002. " Entrepreneurship as Recombinant Growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 69-80, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  31. Freeman, C., 1991. "Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 499-514, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  32. Jaffe, Adam B & Trajtenberg, Manuel & Henderson, Rebecca, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(3), pages 577-98, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  33. Bruce Tether, 2003. "The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 481-505, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  34. Weitzman, Martin L, 1996. "Hybridizing Growth Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(2), pages 207-12, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  35. David Keeble, Frank Wilkinson, 1999. "Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 295-303, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  36. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
  37. Martin, Ron, 1999. "The New 'Geographical Turn' in Economics: Some Critical Reflections," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 65-91, January.
  38. Davis, Donald R. & Weinstein, David E., 1999. "Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 379-407, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  39. Donald A. Hicks, Steven R. Nivin, 2000. "Beyond Globalization: Localized Returns to IT Infrastructure Investments," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 115-127, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  40. Cristiano Antonelli, 2000. "Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: The Evidence of Technological Districts," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 535-547, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  41. Storper, Michael, 1996. "Innovation as Collective Action: Conventions, Products and Technologies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 761-90.
  42. Cooke, Philip & Gomez Uranga, Mikel & Etxebarria, Goio, 1997. "Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 475-491, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  43. Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2003. "Institutional Variety, Networking and Knowledge Exchange: Communication and Innovation in the Case of the Brianza Technological District," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 159-172, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  44. Metcalfe, J S, 1995. "Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 25-46, February.
  45. Dow, Gregory K., 1987. "The function of authority in transaction cost economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 13-38, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  46. Audretsch, David B & Stephan, Paula E, 1996. "Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 641-52, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2009-11-5.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.