IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nmp/nuland/3746.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bioeconomía y consumo: valoración de alimentos saludables y sustentables

Author

Listed:
  • Rodriguez, Julieta A.
  • Lupín, Beatriz
  • Mujica, Guillermina
  • Cutrera, Gianluca
  • Adamini, Ariana

Abstract

Desde hace unos años, viene cambiando el paradigma de la agricultura y la alimentación imperante hacia uno más sustentable, con mayor conciencia por la salud y el ambiente, impulsado por la bioeconomía. Esta transición comprende a todos los agentes de la cadena. Precisamente, en esta Comunicación, el interés se centra en el consumidor, presentando una experiencia que permite evaluar la valoración de una papa producida con menor contenido de agroquímicos, empaquetada y etiquetada. Los datos provienen de una Subasta Experimental-Segundo Precio de Vickrey, complementada con un formulario de encuesta, desarrollada durante 2017, en Mar del Plata. Se seleccionó dicho producto por encontrarse plenamente incorporado a la alimentación de los argentinos, con un consumo medio de 52 kg/per cápita/año (Bergonzi & Constantino, 2021), siendo el Sudeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (SEB), donde la ciudad en cuestión se encuentra emplazada, la principal región productora del país. Por lo general, se produce con escasa diferenciación y se comercializa, en el mercado doméstico, sin empaquetar. Los resultados indican que los participantes valoran las variedades de papa con buenas aptitudes culinarias, producidas con bajo impacto ambiental y en un envase etiquetado que permita su correcta identificación.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodriguez, Julieta A. & Lupín, Beatriz & Mujica, Guillermina & Cutrera, Gianluca & Adamini, Ariana, 2022. "Bioeconomía y consumo: valoración de alimentos saludables y sustentables," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3746, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    • Handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:3746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nulan.mdp.edu.ar/id/eprint/3746/1/rodriguez-etal-2022.pdf
    File Function: accepted
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauline M. Ippolito & Alan D. Mathios, 1990. "Information, Advertising and Health Choices: A Study of the Cereal Market," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(3), pages 459-480, Autumn.
    2. Lusk,Jayson L. & Shogren,Jason F., 2007. "Experimental Auctions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521855167.
    3. Rodolfo M. Nayga, 1996. "Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 467-475.
    4. Aleksandar Grubor & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic, 2018. "Serbian Organic Food Consumer Research and Bioeconomy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Jin, Shaosheng & Zhang, Yan & Xu, Yining, 2015. "Amount of Information and consumers' willingness to pay for food traceability in China," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211811, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiesel Kristin & Villas-Boas Sofia B, 2007. "Got Organic Milk? Consumer Valuations of Milk Labels after the Implementation of the USDA Organic Seal," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-40, April.
    2. Han, Jae-Hwan & Harrison, R. Wes, 2006. "Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35277, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. He, Senhui & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Rimal, Arbindra, 2003. "The Effects Of Irrational Responses In Contingent Valuation Survey And The Appropriate Treatment," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35073, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Jau-Rong Li & Dawn D. Thilmany, 1998. "Branded pork consumption in Taiwan: Analysis of market and product choice," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 127-138.
    5. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    6. Hattori, Keisuke & Higashida, Keisaku, 2014. "Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2007. "Willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina: evidence from a consumer survey," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1300, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    8. A. Banerji & Neha Gupta, 2011. "Do Auction Bids Betray Expectations-Based Reference Dependent Preferences? A Test, Experimental Evidence, And Estimates Of Loss Aversion," Working papers 206, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    9. Frode Alfnes & Chengyan Yue & Helen H. Jensen, 2010. "Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 37(2), pages 147-163, June.
    10. Variyam, Jayachandran N. & Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David, 1997. "Diet-Health Information and Nutrition: The Intake of Dietary Fats and Cholesterol," Technical Bulletins 156800, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Villas-Boas, Sofia B & Taylor, Rebecca & Krovetz, Hannah, 2016. "Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Food Choices During Drought," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9vh3x180, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(3), pages 331-355, September.
    13. Wen Chern & Huei-Ching Lin, 2012. "Taiwanese Consumer Valuation of Country of Origin Labeling Using Auction Experiment with Tasting," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 184-198, June.
    14. Bernard Ruffieux & Anne Rozan & Stéphane Robin, 2008. "Mesurer les préférences du consommateur pour orienter les décisions des pouvoirs publics : l'apport de la méthode expérimentale," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 182(1), pages 113-127.
    15. Demont, Matty & Rutsaert, Pieter & Ndour, Maimouna & Verbeke, Wim & Seck, Papa Abdoulaye & Tollens, Eric, 2012. "Experimental auctions, collective induction and choice shift: Willingness-to-pay for rice quality in Senegal," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126861, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Nicolas Jacquemet & Alexander James & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2011. "Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 413-433, March.
    17. Marcellino, Dana M. & Wilson, Christine A., 2006. "The Current State and Value of Farm Record Keeping," 2006 Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition, October 2-3, 2006, Washington, DC 133087, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    18. Jae-Hwan Han & R. Wes Harrison, 2007. "Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 700-719.
    19. Vincenzo Carrieri & Ansgar Wuebker, 2014. "Does the Letter Matter (and for Everyone)? - Quasi-experimental Evidence on the Eff ects of Home Invitation on Mammography Uptake," Ruhr Economic Papers 0491, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Trinidad Beleche & Nellie Lew & Rosemarie L. Summers & J. Laron Kirby, 2018. "Are Graphic Warning Labels Stopping Millions of Smokers? A Comment on Huang, Chaloupka, and Fong," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 15(2), pages 129–157-1, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nmp:nuland:3746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian Merlino S. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femdpar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.