Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process
AbstractWhat do lobbyists do? Some believe that lobbyists’ main role is to provide issue-specific information and expertise to congressmen to help guide the law-making process. Others believe that lobbyists mainly provide the firms and other special interests they represent with access to politicians in their “circle of influence” and that this access is the be-all and end-all of how lobbyists affect the lawmaking process. This paper combines a descriptive analysis with more targeted testing to get inside the black box of the lobbying process and inform our understanding of the relative importance of these two views of lobbying. We exploit multiple sources of data covering the period 1999 to 2008, including: federal lobbying registration from the Senate Office of Public Records, Federal Election Commission reports, committee and subcommittee assignments for the 106th to 110th Congresses, and background information on individual lobbyists. A pure issue expertise view of lobbying does not fit the data well. Instead, maintaining connections to politicians appears central to what lobbyists do. In particular, we find that whom lobbyists are connected to (through political campaign donations) directly affects what they work on. More importantly, lobbyists appear to systematically switch issues as the politicians they were previously connected to switch committee assignments, hence following people they know rather than sticking to issues. We also find evidence that lobbyists that have issue expertise earn a premium, but we uncover that such a premium for lobbyists that have connections to many politicians and Members of Congress is considerably larger.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 16765.
Date of creation: Feb 2011
Date of revision:
Publication status: published as “Is It Whom You Know Or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process” (joint with Matilde Bombardini and Francesco Trebbi), forthcoming, American Economic Review.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
- P48 - Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Political Economy; Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Austen-Smith, David & Banks, Jeffrey S., 2002. "Costly signaling and cheap talk in models of political influence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 263-280, June.
- Tim Besley & Ian Preston, 2007.
"Electoral bias and policy choice: theory and evidence,"
IFS Working Papers
W07/06, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Timothy Besley & Ian Preston, 2007. "Electoral Bias and Policy Choice: Theory and Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 122(4), pages 1473-1510, November.
- Tim Besley & Ian Preston, 2006. "Electoral bias and policy choice: theory and evidence," IFS Working Papers W06/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- Timothy Besley & Ian Preston, 2006. "Electoral Bias and Policy Choice:Theory and Evidence," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 17, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Jordi Blanes i Vidal & Mirko Draca & Christian Fons-Rosen, 2010. "Revolving Door Lobbyists," CEP Discussion Papers dp0993, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Stefano DellaVigna & Ruben Durante & Brian Knight & Eliana La Ferrara, 2013.
"Market-based Lobbying: Evidence from Advertising Spending in Italy,"
505, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Della Vigna, Stefano & Durante, Ruben & Knight, Brian & La Ferrara, Eliana, 2014. "Market-based Lobbying: Evidence from Advertising Spending in Italy," CEPR Discussion Papers 9813, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Stefano DellaVigna & Ruben Durante & Brian Knight & Eliana La Ferrara, 2013. "Market-based Lobbying: Evidence from Advertising Spending in Italy," NBER Working Papers 19766, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Simon Luechinger & Christoph Moser, 2012.
"The Value of the Revolving Door: Political Appointees and the Stock Market,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
3921, CESifo Group Munich.
- Christoph Moser & Simon Luechinger, 2012. "The Value of the Revolving Door: Political Appointees and the Stock Market," KOF Working papers 12-310, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
- Matilde Bombardini & Francesco Trebbi, 2009.
"Competition and Political Organization: Together or Alone in Lobbying for Trade Policy?,"
NBER Working Papers
14771, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bombardini, Matilde & Trebbi, Francesco, 2012. "Competition and political organization: Together or alone in lobbying for trade policy?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 18-26.
- Groll, Thomas & Ellis, Christopher J., 2012.
"A Simple Model of the Commercial Lobbying Industry,"
36168, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Thomas Groll & Christopher J. Ellis, 2013. "A Simple Model of the Commercial Lobbying Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 4110, CESifo Group Munich.
- Yan Leung Cheung & P. Raghavendra Rau & Aris Stouraitis, 2012. "How much do firms pay as bribes and what benefits do they get? Evidence from corruption cases worldwide," NBER Working Papers 17981, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Igan, Deniz & Mishra, Prachi, 2011. "Three's company: Wall Street, Capitol Hill, and K Street," MPRA Paper 44220, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2012.
- Jin-Hyuk Kim, 2013. "Determinants of post-congressional lobbying employment," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 107-126, May.
- William R. Kerr & William F. Lincoln & Prachi Mishra, 2011.
"The Dynamics of Firm Lobbying,"
NBER Working Papers
17577, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & Amir Kermani & James Kwak & Todd Mitton, 2013. "The Value of Connections in Turbulent Times: Evidence from the United States," NBER Working Papers 19701, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Murray, Cameron K., 2012. "Markets in political influence: rent-seeking, networks and groups," MPRA Paper 42070, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Martin Gregor, 2011. "Corporate lobbying: A review of the recent literature," Working Papers IES 2011/32, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Nov 2011.
- Jordi Blanes i Vidal & Mirko Draca & Christian Fons-Rosen, 2012. "Revolving Door Lobbyists," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3731-48, December.
- John M. de Figueiredo & Brian Kelleher Richter, 2013. "Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying," NBER Working Papers 19698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Luigi Zingales, 2011. "Comment on "A Fistful of Dollars: Lobbying and the Financial Crisis"," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2011, Volume 26, pages 236-243 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Thomas Groll & Christopher J. Ellis, 2013. "Dynamic Commercial Lobbying," CESifo Working Paper Series 4114, CESifo Group Munich.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.