This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A Recent Trend in Ecological Economic Research: Quantifying the Benefits and Costs of Improving Ecosystem Services

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Feng, Hongli
Jha, Manoj
Gassman, Philip W.
Parcel, Josh
Abstract

Over the last two decades, the U.S. federal government spent about 2 billion dollars annually on the conservation of cropland. Such expenditures were supplemented with sizable state and local government funding. However, our understanding is incomplete as to the impacts of these expenditures on the use of conservation practices and their environmental effectiveness. Expanded knowledge on these issues is greatly needed to support societal decisions as to how much more, if any, we must do to improve environmental quality to a desired level. In this article, we provide some insights into these issues by examining two broad questions as applied to the state of Iowa: 1) What conservation practices are currently in place, what is their coverage, and what is the cost of these practices? 2) What have been the environmental impacts of the currently-installed conservation practices? To address the first question, we collected data from various surveys, and from federal and state conservation program sources. A database was established for some major conservation practices with regard to their costs and coverage. An estimate was also made for total statewide annual costs. The challenges and problems encountered in establishing accurate statewide cost estimates will be discussed. In order to answer the second question, the widely used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) water quality model was employed to estimate the impacts of key conservation practices. We simulated the hypothetical removal of all existing conservation practices from the landscape and compared the impacts with current baseline conditions that included the conservation practices. The advantages and drawbacks of modeling will be identified to put our results in perspective.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Iowa State University, Department of Economics in its series Staff General Research Papers with number 13079.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: 11 Jun 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:isu:genres:13079

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070
Phone: +1 515.294.6741
Fax: +1 515.294.0221
Email:
Web page: http://www.econ.iastate.edu
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Stephanie Bridges).

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A tutorial is available.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.