This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Returns on R&D investment: A comprehensive survey on the magnitude and evaluation methodologies

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Andreia Cardoso () (UITT; INESC Porto)
Aurora A.C. Teixeira () (INESC Porto, CEFUP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

As technology and innovation seem to be contingent upon each other a great deal of attention has been given to the importance of assessing the contribution of R&D investment to firm and industry performance and, ultimately, to the economic performance of countries and regions. In industrialised societies not only private but also public agents have allocated increasing amounts of their resources to R&D activities, often considered the key path to innovativeness. At the same time, due to advances in empirical research, increasingly more focused on the micro (firms) rather than on the macro (country) level, old myths about the relationship between R&D, innovation and success began to fall down. Firstly, the idea that innovation is much broader than R&D has gained large support and has made it possible to identify other sources of innovation, beyond excellence in R&D, which had been largely hidden or neglected. As result, perceptions about small firms - or the so-called low-tech industries, which either do not carry out any significant R&D activities or are likely to perform them outside formal classifications - started to change. Secondly, the idea that more R&D investment is always automatically bond to success - whatever criteria one may choose to define success – has become nothing more than a utopia. In this paper we carry out an analysis of the literature on the magnitude and evaluation of R&D, and, possibly, of innovation. We identify the methodologies used and analyse to what extent the magnitude of (eventual) R&D returns is dependent on the methodology pursued and the level of analysis - firms (micro), industry (meso), and regions/countries (macro) - considered. We conclude that methodological approaches and levels of analysis determine, to a certain extent, the type of results obtained and, thus, variances between them.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://matasetix.inescporto.pt/RePEc/inc/09.03.19_WP1_CardosoTeixeira.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: No restriction to downloads

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by INESC Porto, Unidade de Inovação e Transferência de Tecnologia(UITT) in its series UITT Working Papers with number 2009-03-wp1.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:inc:wpaper:2009-03-wp1

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
Phone: (+351)222094215
Fax: (+351)222094215
Web page: http://www.inescporto.pt/uitt

Order Information:
Postal: Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
Email:
Web: http://www.inescporto.pt/uitt

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Andreia Passos).

Related research
Keywords: Innovations and R&D indicators; Methodologies; Macro; meso and micro levels; R&D payoff;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Howells, Jeremy, 2005. "Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1220-1234, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Beñat Bilbao-Osorio & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2004. "From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 35(4), pages 434-455. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Freel, Mark S, 2000. " Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-innovators?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 195-210, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Aurora Teixeira & Natércia Fortuna, 2003. "Human Capital, Innovation Capability and Economic Growth," FEP Working Papers 131, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto. [Downloadable!]
  5. Bougrain, Frederic & Haudeville, Bernard, 2002. "Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 735-747, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Acs, Zoltan J & Audretsch, David B, 1988. "Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(4), pages 678-90, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-4.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.