IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hub/wpecon/201102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimizing the supply chain design for organ transplants

Author

Listed:
  • Belien, Jeroen

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

  • De Boeck, Liesje

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

  • Colpaert, Jan

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

  • Devesse, Stijn
  • Van den Bossche, Filip

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium)

Abstract

Organ transplants have always suffered from long waiting lists. This has led to time playing a crucial role in the organ transplant process. Therefore, from the moment a potential donor is notified, it is important to get the organ as quickly as possible to its recipient. The ultimate goal of this paper is to develop a general model in order to minimize this transport time. This is accomplished by jointly determining which transplant center(s) for which organ(s) to establish in a particular country (given the location of potential transplant centers), and the location of shipping agents for transportation of these organs. The problem is modeled as a mixed integer programming (MIP) problem. We then apply this model to organ transplants in Belgium. Extensive numerical experiments show that considering only the components influencing the cold ischemia time in the objective function, as well as a budget constraint or non binding time covering constraint, leads to the centralization of transplant centers. The MIP model performs well in terms of computation times except for the case involving a huge number of potential shipping agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Belien, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & Colpaert, Jan & Devesse, Stijn & Van den Bossche, Filip, 2011. "Optimizing the supply chain design for organ transplants," Working Papers 2011/02, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.hubrussel.be/bitstream/123456789/4644/1/11HRP02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oguzhan Alagoz & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2009. "Optimizing Organ Allocation and Acceptance," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: H. Edwin Romeijn & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in Medicine, chapter 1, pages 1-24, Springer.
    2. ReVelle, C.S. & Eiselt, H.A. & Daskin, M.S., 2008. "A bibliography for some fundamental problem categories in discrete location science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 817-848, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caruso, Valeria & Daniele, Patrizia, 2018. "A network model for minimizing the total organ transplant costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 652-662.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buchheim, Christoph & Crama, Yves & Rodríguez-Heck, Elisabeth, 2019. "Berge-acyclic multilinear 0–1 optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 102-107.
    2. Abareshi, Maryam & Zaferanieh, Mehdi, 2019. "A bi-level capacitated P-median facility location problem with the most likely allocation solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-20.
    3. M. Fattahi & M. Mahootchi & S. M. Moattar Husseini, 2016. "Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 423-456, July.
    4. Fredriksson, Anders, 2017. "Location-allocation of public services – Citizen access, transparency and measurement. A method and evidence from Brazil and Sweden," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Rodolfo Mendoza-Gómez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Karla B. Valenzuela-Ocaña, 2019. "An Efficient Decision-Making Approach for the Planning of Diagnostic Services in a Segmented Healthcare System," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1631-1665, September.
    6. Rentizelas, Athanasios A. & Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P., 2010. "Locating a bioenergy facility using a hybrid optimization method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 196-209, January.
    7. Tomaz Dentinho & Vasco Silva, 2012. "Optimization of Location Services in the city of Huambo. Confirmation of the Theory of Central Places," ERSA conference papers ersa12p254, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    9. Abdolsalam Ghaderi, 2015. "Heuristic Algorithms for Solving an Integrated Dynamic Center Facility Location - Network Design Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 43-69, March.
    10. Shulin Wang & Shanhua Wu, 2023. "Optimizing the Location of Virtual-Shopping-Experience Stores Based on the Minimum Impact on Urban Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Varsei, Mohsen & Polyakovskiy, Sergey, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain network design: A case of the wine industry in Australia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 236-247.
    12. Michel Le Breton & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Alexei Savvateev & Shlomo Weber, 2013. "Stability and fairness in models with a multiple membership," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(3), pages 673-694, August.
    13. Sahar Ahmadvand & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2018. "An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 587-603, December.
    14. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Ji, Ya-Min & Qi, Ming-Liang, 2020. "A robust optimization approach for decontamination planning of emergency planning zone: Facility location and assignment plan," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    17. Junjie Wu & Jian Chen & Yili Ren, 2011. "GIS enabled service site selection: Environmental analysis and beyond," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 337-348, July.
    18. Ishizaka, Alessio & Nemery, Philippe & Lidouh, Karim, 2013. "Location selection for the construction of a casino in the Greater London region: A triple multi-criteria approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 211-220.
    19. Contreras, Ivan & Fernández, Elena & Reinelt, Gerhard, 2012. "Minimizing the maximum travel time in a combined model of facility location and network design," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 847-860.
    20. Mingjian Wu & Tae J. Kwon & Karim El-Basyouny, 2020. "A Citywide Location-Allocation Framework for Driver Feedback Signs: Optimizing Safety and Coverage of Vulnerable Road Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:201102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Janssens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emhubbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.