IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v21y2018i4d10.1007_s10729-017-9414-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sahar Ahmadvand

    (Iran University of Science & Technology)

  • Mir Saman Pishvaee

    (Iran University of Science & Technology)

Abstract

Given the perennial imbalance and chronic scarcity between the demand for and supply of available organs, organ allocation is one of the most critical decisions in the management of organ transplantation networks. Organ allocation systems undergo rapid revisions for the sake of improved outcomes in terms of both equity and medical efficiency. This paper presents a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based model to evaluate the efficiency of possible patient-organ pairs for kidney allocation in order to enhance the fitness of organ allocation under inherent uncertainty in such problem. Eligible patient-kidney pairs are regarded as decision making units (DMUs) in a Credibility-based Fuzzy Common Weights DEA (CFCWDEA) approach and are ranked based on efficiency scores. Using a common set of weights for all DMUs ensures a high degree of fairness in the assessment and ranking of DMUs. The proposed model is also the first allocation method capable of coping with the vague and intervallic medical and nonmedical allocation factors by the aid of fuzzy programming. Verification and validation of the proposed approach are performed in two steps using a real case study from the Iranian kidney allocation system. First, the superiority of the proposed deterministic model in enhancing allocation outcomes is demonstrated and analyzed. Second, the applicability of the proposed fuzzy DEA method is demonstrated using a series of data realizations for different credibility levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahar Ahmadvand & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2018. "An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 587-603, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:21:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-017-9414-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-017-9414-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvin E. Roth & Tayfun Sönmez & M. Utku Ünver, 2004. "Kidney Exchange," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(2), pages 457-488.
    2. Israel David & Uri Yechiali, 1995. "One-Attribute Sequential Assignment Match Processes in Discrete Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 879-884, October.
    3. Stefanos A. Zenios & Glenn M. Chertow & Lawrence M. Wein, 2000. "Dynamic Allocation of Kidneys to Candidates on the Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 549-569, August.
    4. Joe Zhu, 2014. "Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 3, number 978-3-319-06647-9, September.
    5. Bruce Hollingsworth, 2008. "The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(10), pages 1107-1128, October.
    6. Nan Kong & Andrew J. Schaefer & Brady Hunsaker & Mark S. Roberts, 2010. "Maximizing the Efficiency of the U.S. Liver Allocation System Through Region Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(12), pages 2111-2122, December.
    7. Oguzhan Alagoz & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2009. "Optimizing Organ Allocation and Acceptance," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: H. Edwin Romeijn & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in Medicine, chapter 1, pages 1-24, Springer.
    8. Cook, Wade D. & Kress, Moshe, 1991. "A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 191-198, September.
    9. Xuanming Su & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2005. "Patient Choice in Kidney Allocation: A Sequential Stochastic Assignment Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 443-455, June.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Xuanming Su & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2006. "Recipient Choice Can Address the Efficiency-Equity Trade-off in Kidney Transplantation: A Mechanism Design Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1647-1660, November.
    12. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2013. "Fairness, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Organ Allocation for Kidney Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 73-87, February.
    13. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2004. "The Optimal Timing of Living-Donor Liver Transplantation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1420-1430, October.
    14. Wade D. Cook & Moshe Kress, 1990. "A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(11), pages 1302-1310, November.
    15. Israel David & Uri Yechiali, 1985. "A Time-dependent Stopping Problem with Application to Live Organ Transplants," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 491-504, June.
    16. Joe Zhu, 2014. "Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, edition 3, chapter 1, pages 1-9, Springer.
    17. Li, Xiao-Bai & Reeves, Gary R., 1999. "A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 507-517, June.
    18. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    19. Jae-Hyeon Ahn & John C. Hornberger, 1996. "Involving Patients in the Cadaveric Kidney Transplant Allocation Process: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 629-641, May.
    20. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla & Friedman, Lea, 1998. "DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 470-478, December.
    21. Mehmet C. Demirci & Andrew J. Schaefer & H. Edwin Romeijn & Mark S. Roberts, 2012. "An Exact Method for Balancing Efficiency and Equity in the Liver Allocation Hierarchy," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 260-275, May.
    22. James E. Stahl & Nan Kong & Steven M. Shechter & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2005. "A Methodological Framework for Optimally Reorganizing Liver Transplant Regions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(1), pages 35-46, January.
    23. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Determining the Acceptance of Cadaveric Livers Using an Implicit Model of the Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 24-36, February.
    24. Pishvaee, M.S. & Razmi, J. & Torabi, S.A., 2014. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 14-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pejman Peykani & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Ali Ebrahimnejad & Emran Mohammadi, 2022. "Fuzzy chance-constrained data envelopment analysis: a structured literature review, current trends, and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 197-261, June.
    2. Alexandre Marinho & Claudia Affonso Silva Araújo, 2021. "Using data envelopment analysis and the bootstrap method to evaluate organ transplantation efficiency in Brazil," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 569-581, September.
    3. Amir Elalouf, 2022. "Israeli Medical Experts’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences in Allocating Donor Organs for Transplantation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Francisco Javier Santos Arteaga & Debora Di Caprio & David Cucchiari & Josep M Campistol & Federico Oppenheimer & Fritz Diekmann & Ignacio Revuelta, 2021. "Modeling patients as decision making units: evaluating the efficiency of kidney transplantation through data envelopment analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 55-71, March.
    5. Kargar, Bahareh & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Jahani, Hamed & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2020. "Organ transportation and allocation problem under medical uncertainty: A real case study of liver transplantation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kargar, Bahareh & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Jahani, Hamed & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2020. "Organ transportation and allocation problem under medical uncertainty: A real case study of liver transplantation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Sakine Batun & Andrew J. Schaefer & Atul Bhandari & Mark S. Roberts, 2018. "Optimal Liver Acceptance for Risk-Sensitive Patients," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 320-333, September.
    3. Barış Ata & Anton Skaro & Sridhar Tayur, 2017. "OrganJet: Overcoming Geographical Disparities in Access to Deceased Donor Kidneys in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2776-2794, September.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2013. "Fairness, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Organ Allocation for Kidney Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 73-87, February.
    5. Burhaneddin Sandıkçı & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Oguzhan Alagoz & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "Estimating the Patient's Price of Privacy in Liver Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1393-1410, December.
    6. Nan Kong & Andrew J. Schaefer & Brady Hunsaker & Mark S. Roberts, 2010. "Maximizing the Efficiency of the U.S. Liver Allocation System Through Region Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(12), pages 2111-2122, December.
    7. Murat Kurt & Mark S. Roberts & Andrew J. Schaefer & M. Utku Ünver, 2011. "Valuing Prearranged Paired Kidney Exchanges: A Stochastic Game Approach," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 785, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 14 Oct 2011.
    8. Ozge Ceren Ersoy & Diwakar Gupta & Timothy Pruett, 2021. "A critical look at the U.S. deceased‐donor organ procurement and utilization system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 3-29, February.
    9. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Choosing Among Living-Donor and Cadaveric Livers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(11), pages 1702-1715, November.
    10. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Determining the Acceptance of Cadaveric Livers Using an Implicit Model of the Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 24-36, February.
    11. Baris Ata & Yichuan Ding & Stefanos Zenios, 2021. "An Achievable-Region-Based Approach for Kidney Allocation Policy Design with Endogenous Patient Choice," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 36-54, 1-2.
    12. Mustafa Akan & Oguzhan Alagoz & Baris Ata & Fatih Safa Erenay & Adnan Said, 2012. "A Broader View of Designing the Liver Allocation System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 757-770, August.
    13. Sinem Savaşer & Ömer Burak Kınay & Bahar Yetis Kara & Pelin Cay, 2019. "Organ transplantation logistics: a case for Turkey," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(2), pages 327-356, June.
    14. Yael Deutsch & Israel David, 2020. "Benchmark policies for utility-carrying queues with impatience," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 97-120, June.
    15. Sepehr Nemati & Zeynep G. Icten & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2020. "Mitigating Information Asymmetry in Liver Allocation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 234-248, April.
    16. Zahra Gharibi & Michael Hahsler, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Model to Study the Impact of Multiple-Region Listing and Information Sharing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
    17. I. Contreras & S. Lozano & M. A. Hinojosa, 2021. "A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2181-2201, September.
    18. Burhaneddin Sandıkçı & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2013. "Alleviating the Patient's Price of Privacy Through a Partially Observable Waiting List," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1836-1854, August.
    19. Chaithanya Bandi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Phebe Vayanos, 2019. "Robust Multiclass Queuing Theory for Wait Time Estimation in Resource Allocation Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 152-187, January.
    20. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:21:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10729-017-9414-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.