IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v48y2000i4p549-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Allocation of Kidneys to Candidates on the Transplant Waiting List

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanos A. Zenios

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Glenn M. Chertow

    (Division of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143)

  • Lawrence M. Wein

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

The crux of the kidney allocation problem is the trade-off between clinical efficiency and equity. We consider a dynamic resource allocation problem with the tri-criteria objective of maximizing the quality-adjusted life expectancy of transplant candidates (clinical efficiency) and minimizing two measures of inequity: a linear function of the likelihood of transplantation of the various types of patients, and a quadratic function that quantifies the differences in mean waiting times across patient types. The dynamic status of patients is modeled by a set of linear differential equations, and an approximate analysis of the optimal control problem yields a dynamic index policy. We construct a large-scale simulation model using data from over 30,000 transplants, and the simulation results demonstrate that, relative to the organ allocation policy currently employed in the United States, the dynamic index policy increases the quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduces the mean waiting time until transplantation for all six demographic groups (two sexes, races, and age groups) under consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanos A. Zenios & Glenn M. Chertow & Lawrence M. Wein, 2000. "Dynamic Allocation of Kidneys to Candidates on the Transplant Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 549-569, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:4:p:549-569
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.4.549.12418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.4.549.12418
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.48.4.549.12418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Israel David & Uri Yechiali, 1995. "One-Attribute Sequential Assignment Match Processes in Discrete Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 879-884, October.
    2. Cyrus Derman & Gerald J. Lieberman & Sheldon M. Ross, 1972. "A Sequential Stochastic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(7), pages 349-355, March.
    3. Yufei Yuan & Amiram Gafni & J. David Russell & David Ludwin, 1994. "Development of a Central Matching System for the Allocation of Cadaveric Kidneys," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 14(2), pages 124-136, April.
    4. Jae-Hyeon Ahn & John C. Hornberger, 1996. "Involving Patients in the Cadaveric Kidney Transplant Allocation Process: A Decision-Theoretic Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 629-641, May.
    5. Rhonda Righter, 1989. "A Resource Allocation Problem in a Random Environment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 329-338, April.
    6. Loomes, Graham & McKenzie, Lynda, 1989. "The use of QALYs in health care decision making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 299-308, January.
    7. Richard C. Larson, 1987. "OR Forum—Perspectives on Queues: Social Justice and the Psychology of Queueing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 895-905, December.
    8. John Hornberger & Jae-Hyeon Ahn, 1997. "Deciding Eligibility for Transplantation When a Donor Kidney Becomes Available," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 160-170, April.
    9. R. Jean Ruth & Leon Wyszewianski & Gary Herline, 1985. "Kidney Transplantation: A Simulation Model for Examining Demand and Supply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 515-526, May.
    10. A. David Paltiel, 1997. "Organ Allocation and the Secretary Problem," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 231-232, April.
    11. Jeff Richardson & Erik Nord, 1997. "The importance of Perspective in the Measurement of Quality-adjusted Life Years," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(1), pages 33-41, February.
    12. Israel David & Uri Yechiali, 1985. "A Time-dependent Stopping Problem with Application to Live Organ Transplants," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 491-504, June.
    13. Y Yuan & A Gafni & D Russell & D Ludwin, 1992. "Development of a Central Matching System for the Allocation of Cadaveric Kidneys: A Simulation of Clinical Effectiveness vs. Equity," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 1992-22, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Determining the Acceptance of Cadaveric Livers Using an Implicit Model of the Waiting List," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 24-36, February.
    2. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2004. "The Optimal Timing of Living-Donor Liver Transplantation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1420-1430, October.
    3. Kargar, Bahareh & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Jahani, Hamed & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2020. "Organ transportation and allocation problem under medical uncertainty: A real case study of liver transplantation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Burhaneddin Sandıkçı & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Oguzhan Alagoz & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "Estimating the Patient's Price of Privacy in Liver Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1393-1410, December.
    5. Murat Kurt & Mark S. Roberts & Andrew J. Schaefer & M. Utku Ünver, 2011. "Valuing Prearranged Paired Kidney Exchanges: A Stochastic Game Approach," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 785, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 14 Oct 2011.
    6. Oguzhan Alagoz & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2007. "Choosing Among Living-Donor and Cadaveric Livers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(11), pages 1702-1715, November.
    7. Xuanming Su & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2005. "Patient Choice in Kidney Allocation: A Sequential Stochastic Assignment Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 443-455, June.
    8. Sakine Batun & Andrew J. Schaefer & Atul Bhandari & Mark S. Roberts, 2018. "Optimal Liver Acceptance for Risk-Sensitive Patients," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 320-333, September.
    9. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2013. "Fairness, Efficiency, and Flexibility in Organ Allocation for Kidney Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 73-87, February.
    10. Mustafa Akan & Oguzhan Alagoz & Baris Ata & Fatih Safa Erenay & Adnan Said, 2012. "A Broader View of Designing the Liver Allocation System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 757-770, August.
    11. Barış Ata & Anton Skaro & Sridhar Tayur, 2017. "OrganJet: Overcoming Geographical Disparities in Access to Deceased Donor Kidneys in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2776-2794, September.
    12. Baris Ata & Yichuan Ding & Stefanos Zenios, 2021. "An Achievable-Region-Based Approach for Kidney Allocation Policy Design with Endogenous Patient Choice," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 36-54, 1-2.
    13. Sahar Ahmadvand & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2018. "An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 587-603, December.
    14. Sheldon Ross & David Wu, 2013. "A generalized coupon collecting model as a parsimonious optimal stochastic assignment model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 133-146, September.
    15. Yael Deutsch & Israel David, 2020. "Benchmark policies for utility-carrying queues with impatience," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 97-120, June.
    16. Levy, Amnon, 2005. "A decision-rule for transplanting non-cadaveric organs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 548-554, July.
    17. Theophilus Dhyankumar Chellappa & Ramasubramaniam Muthurathinasapathy & V. G. Venkatesh & Yangyan Shi & Samsul Islam, 2023. "Location of organ procurement and distribution organisation decisions and their impact on kidney allocations: a developing country perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 755-781, February.
    18. Perlman, Yael & Elalouf, Amir & Yechiali, Uri, 2018. "Dynamic allocation of stochastically-arriving flexible resources to random streams of objects with application to kidney cross-transplantation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 169-177.
    19. Ubel, Peter A. & Loewenstein, George & Scanlon, Dennis & Kamlet, Mark, 1998. "Value measurement in cost-utility analysis: explaining the discrepancy between rating scale and person trade-off elicitations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 33-44, January.
    20. Zahra Gharibi & Michael Hahsler, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Optimization Model to Study the Impact of Multiple-Region Listing and Information Sharing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:4:p:549-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.