IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01428898.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The strategic intent of logistic service providers on three processes : French case

Author

Listed:
  • Elodie Kacioui-Maurin

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Jennifer Lazzeri

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Valérie Michon

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Our aim is to discuss the strategic intent of French Logistic Service Providers (LSPs) through three logistics processes: innovation, traceabilityand pooling. Research Approach: Previous literature mostly describes the LSP as a proactive actor dealing with supply chain strategy. This paper uses some of the results of three qualitative researches (on innovation processes, traceability, and logistics pooling) between 2010 and 2014 on French LSPs. Content analysis is then used to build fromthese empirical results a theoretical framework. Findings and Originality:Concerning innovation processes, the contract length and the shippers' vision of outsourcing explain the lack of LSPs revolutionary innovations. Incremental innovations such as technological and organizational are much more implemented because of a lower risk level. They do not lead to a long-term strategic intent even if they consider this as a major strategic issue. Traceability of supply chains appears to be a strategic issue for firms. As intermediate actors of a supply chain, LSPs could consider traceability as a possibility to offer a distinctive service. In fact, the only reason why LSPs improve this kind of process is to transfer their responsibility to their customers. They split the responsibilities and no strategic intent appears in the actors' interviews. Concerning logistics poolingprocess, LSPs are not getting involved and do not implement a logistics network process, they prefer offering services they know well, as they always did since the last thirty years. The creation of networks with multiple shippers means dealing with their customers in the way they are not used to, in more complex processes. We conclude that LSPs are not proactive in these three strategic processes, which lead to the conclusion that they miss a strategic intent. Much has been written on the operational role of LSPs. However, little has been written concerning the strategic intent of this actor of the supply chain. This paper bridges this gap, providing the necessity for this interface actor to have a strategic intent that could lead to improve the supply chain management. Research Impact: The paper strives to limit the enthusiastic theoretical way of thinking of the LSP's strategic intent. It brings some empirical elements to understand the strategic intent of these third parties. Driving factorsand strategic behaviorare diagnosed and discussed. Practical Impact: Our aim is to understand betterLSPs role and the possible weight they could gain in the case of a strategic intent. They could also propose and develop new added value services that could improve their position in the supply chain. We will show that strategic intent might create value and help them to be considered as partners instead of subcontracting firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Elodie Kacioui-Maurin & Jennifer Lazzeri & Valérie Michon, 2015. "The strategic intent of logistic service providers on three processes : French case," Post-Print hal-01428898, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01428898
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01428898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01428898/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvarez, María José & Alfaro, José A. & Rábade, Luis Arturo, 2006. "Buyer-supplier relationships influence on traceability implementation in the vegetable industry," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb060502, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    2. Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2009. "Tracking, tracing, and business process interests in food commodities: A multi-level decision complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 317-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Witold Bahr & Edward Sweeney, 2019. "Environmental Sustainability in the Follow-Up and Evaluation Stage of Logistics Services Purchasing: Perspectives from UK Shippers and 3PLs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shou, Yongyi & Zhao, Xinyu & Dai, Jing & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Xiongyong Zhou & Madeleine Pullman & Zhiduan Xu, 2022. "The impact of food supply chain traceability on sustainability performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 93-115, June.
    3. Saikouk, Tarik & Badraoui, Ismail & Spalanzani, Alain, 2014. "The Forest Supply Chain Management: An Entropic Perspective," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 487-513, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    4. Wang, X. & Li, D. & O'brien, C. & Li, Y., 2010. "A production planning model to reduce risk and improve operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 463-474, April.
    5. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    6. Anna Walaszczyk & Małgorzata Koszewska & Iwona Staniec, 2022. "Food Traceability as an Element of Sustainable Consumption—Pandemic-Driven Changes in Consumer Attitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Auler, Daniel P. & Teiceira, Rafael & Nardi, Vinicius, 2016. "Food safety as a field in supply chain management studies: a systematic literature review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(1), September.
    8. Mohammed, Ahmed & Wang, Qian, 2017. "The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 47-58.
    9. Jianyu Yu & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Production standards, competition and vertical relationship," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 79-111.
    10. Piramuthu, Selwyn & Farahani, Poorya & Grunow, Martin, 2013. "RFID-generated traceability for contaminated product recall in perishable food supply networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 253-262.
    11. Dominik Zimon & Peter Madzik & Pedro Domingues, 2020. "Development of Key Processes along the Supply Chain by Implementing the ISO 22000 Standard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Danielle Galliano & Luis Orozco, 2011. "Les déterminants industriels et spatiaux du processus d'adoption de technologies : Le cas des systèmes de traçabilité dans les firmes industrielles françaises," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 13(2), pages 135-163.
    13. Lehmann, Richard J. & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2011. "Information Reference Models for European Pork Supply Networks," 2011 International European Forum, February 14-18, 2011, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 122014, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Dai, Bin & Nu, Yu & Xie, Xia & Li, Jianbin, 2021. "Interactions of traceability and reliability optimization in a competitive supply chain with product recall," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 116-131.
    15. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Christelle Lemaire, 2010. "Evolution of a total traceability system in a supply chain: Analysis of the influencing factors from a longitudinal study in the industry of fresh-pack cheese [L’évolution d’un système de traçabili," Post-Print hal-03306596, HAL.
    16. Man Mohan Siddh & Sameer Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Vipul Jain & Charu Chandra & Rakesh Jain & Milind Kumar Sharma & Yigit Kazancoglu, 2022. "Impact of agri-fresh food supply chain quality practices on organizational sustainability," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 146-165, June.
    17. Lees, Nic & Nuthall, Peter & Wilson, Mark M.J., 2020. "Relationship quality and supplier performance in food supply chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    18. Beske, Philip & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 131-143.
    19. Resende-Filho, Moises & Buhr, Brian, 2007. "Economics of traceability for mitigation of food recall costs," MPRA Paper 3650, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Leguizamon, Francisco & Selva, Guillermo & Santos, Manuel, 2016. "Small farmer suppliers from local to global," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4520-4525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01428898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.