We compare various matching estimators to the results of two randomized field experiments that evaluate employment effects of job search training programs. We find that commonly used non-experimental matching estimators tend to over-estimate the program effects and that the bias differs between programs owing to different procedures used in selecting the program participants. The bias is larger when participation is voluntary than when caseworkers assign the applicants to training. JEL codes: C93
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Discussion Papers with number
438.
Length: Date of creation: 07 Feb 2008 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:fer:dpaper:438
Contact details of provider: Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 40 304 5500 Fax: +358 9 4780 2929 Email: Web page: http://www.vatt.fi/ More information through EDIRC
Order Information: Email:
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anita Niskanen).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.