This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Evolution of the Finnish Model in the 1990s: from Depression to High-tech Boom

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Jaakko Kiander
Abstract

Finland has recently got much admiration due to economic success reflected in rankings of competitiveness, technology, education and economic growth. This success has largely been embodied in the growth of Nokia group and ICT sector. Yet the economic boom and the success of the Finnish high tech industries is a relatively new phenomenon, starting from the mid-1990s. In fact, the years of good economic performance were preceded by an exceptionally deep recession in the beginning of the 1990s. This paper discusses the roots of the crisis of the Finnish economy, and the factors which helped it to recover and to create the technology-driven growth of the last decade. The focus is both on macroeconomic issues and on institutional change and the role of public policy. The main conclusion of this paper is that the institutional reforms (or the absence of them) seem to have played only minor role in the emergence of unemployment and in the subsequent employment revival in Finland in the 1990s. In addition to the breakthrough of ICT technologies, more traditional macroeconomic factors like changes in monetary policy and exchange rate, and pro-cyclical fiscal policy may have been of great importance. In spite of the severe economic shocks and industrial restructuring, the Finnish political governance and corporatist institutions have remained relatively stable. Political decision making has all the time been largely based on national consensus building like before. The structures of welfare state survived the fiscal crisis of the mid-1990s though the welfare state was forced to go through many small incremental changes, which reduced many entitlements. The central labour market institutions ? strong trade unions with high unionization rate, and centralized incomes policy ? have remained almost intact.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/k344.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.vatt.fi/publications/latestPublications/publication/Publication_1345_id/574
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Discussion Papers with number 344.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 15 Dec 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fer:dpaper:344

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki
Phone: +358 40 304 5500
Fax: +358 9 4780 2929
Email:
Web page: http://www.vatt.fi/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anita Niskanen).

Related research
Keywords: Finland; economic growth; social corporatism; structural change;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General
J00 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - General
E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
O10 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Risto Vaittinen, 2003. "Liberalisation of Agricultural Trade - Global Implications and what it Means for the EU," Discussion Papers 303, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  2. Kari Hämäläinen, 2003. "Education and Unemployment: State Dependence in Unemployment Among Young People in the 1990s," Discussion Papers 312, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  3. Jaakko Kiander, 2004. "Growth and Employment in Nordic Welfare States in the 1990s: a Tale of Crisis and Revival," Discussion Papers 336, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  4. Seppo Kari & Jouko Ylä-Liedenpohja, 2004. "Effects of Equalization Tax on Multinational Investments and Transfer Pricing," Discussion Papers 337, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  5. Takis Venetoklis & Aki Kangasharju, 2003. "Do Wage-subsidies Increase Employment in Firms?," Discussion Papers 304, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  6. Virve Ollikainen, 2003. "The Determinants of Unemployment Duration by Gender in Finland," Discussion Papers 316, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  7. Heikki Räisänen, 2003. "How to Cope with Labour Market Policy Tools in Economic Downturn: Finnish Evidence," Discussion Papers 305, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  8. Sari Pekkala, 2003. "Is Little Brother Nothing but Trouble?: Educational Attainment, Returns to Schooling and Sibling Structure," Discussion Papers 302, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  9. Adriaan Perrels, 2004. "The Basic Service Quality Level of Transport Infrastructure in Peripheral Areas," Discussion Papers 335, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Pekka Sinko, 2003. "Subsidizing vs. Experience Rating of Unemployment Insurance in Unionized Labor Markets," Discussion Papers 319, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Pekka Sinko, 2004. "Progressive Taxation Under Centralised Wage Setting," Discussion Papers 349, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  2. Takis Venetoklis & Heikki Ervasti, 2006. "Unemployment and Subjective Well-being: Does Money Make a Difference," Discussion Papers 391, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  3. Pekka Sulamaa & Mika Widgrén, 2004. "EU-Enlargement and Beyond: A Simulation Study on EU and Russia Integration," Discussion Papers 356, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Tuomas Kosonen, 2007. "The Increased Revenue from Finnish Corporate Income Tax in the 1990s," Discussion Papers 421, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Want to help out with this project? Look for volunteer opportunities.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.