China's WTO Accession and Its Effect on State-Owned Enterprises
AbstractChina's WTO accession has major implications on China's massive state-owned enterprise (SOE) sectors. In China, SOEs as a whole generate substantial losses and absorb majority of financial resources, creating increasing risks for financial crisis. This paper argues that China's WTO agreement has positive effect of reducing the subsidies to SOEs and contributing to the continuing reduction of the SOE sector and the corresponding increase in welfare. We document the history of SOE reform in China as well as its unsatisfactory performance. We hypothesize that an important rationale, among many others, of China's pursuit of WTO membership is to use WTO accession to lock-in the agenda for fundamental domestic reforms, which has been difficult to implement by domestically measures alone. We conduct quantitative analysis of the effects of SOE subsidies on GDP and welfare. The welfare effects of SOE reform induced by the WTO agreement are likely to be much bigger and more significant than the direct gains obtained from tariff reduction. This result highlights the fact that domestic reforms and trade reforms are interlinked. Trade liberalization promotes domestic reforms, often institutional in nature, which may produce substantial welfare gains. These benefits should be added to the direct benefits from tariff reduction.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by East-West Center, Economics Study Area in its series Economics Study Area Working Papers with number 70.
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2004
Date of revision:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Conconi, Paola & Perroni, Carlo, 2009.
"Do credible domestic institutions promote credible international agreements?,"
Journal of International Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 160-170, September.
- Paola Conconi & Carlo Perroni, 2009. "Do Credible Domestic Institutions Promote Credible International Agreements?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/98549, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Conconi, Paola & Perroni, Carlo, 2006. "Do Credible Domestic Institutions Promote Credible International Agreements?," CEPR Discussion Papers 5762, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bems, Rudolfs & Jönsson Hartelius, Kristian, 2003.
"Trade Deficits in the Baltic States: How Long Will the Party Last?,"
Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance
0543, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 05 Aug 2003.
- Rudolfs Bems & Kristian Jönsson Hartelius, 2006. "Trade Deficits in the Baltic States: How Long Will the Party Last?," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(1), pages 179-209, January.
- Bems, Rudolfs & Jönsson, Kristian, 2005. "Trade Deficits in the Baltic States: How Long Will the Party Last?," Working Paper Series 186, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
- Zhiyuan Li & Miaojie Yu, 2009. "Exports, Productivity, and Credit Constraints : A FirmÃ¢â‚¬ÂLevel Empirical Investigation of China," Trade Working Papers 22888, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Brenda Higashimoto).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.