IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002625/2788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efficient Development Portfolio Design for Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Svenja Wiebe
  • Adriaan van Zon

Abstract

The Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz et al., 2009) published in September 2009 has brought back to the attention of policy makers and researchers that measuring a country’s development solely on the basis of GDP or GDP per capita is not sufficient. An early attempt at multidimensional measurement is the Human Development Index (HDI) developed by the United Nations Development Program in 1990. This measure consists of three components: a health index, an education index, and a standard of living index. Even though it was and still is subject to criticism, it is the only multidimensional measure that has been around for almost 20 years. Using the HDI we present an approach to designing development policies that takes into account the intrinsic uncertainties surrounding the impact of individual development policy instruments on the development goals to be achieved. The policy instruments under consideration are government expenditures on different spending categories associated with the HDI-components. The policy goal to be achieved is the maximization of the HDI of individual Sub-Saharan African countries as a direct measure of the level of development of these countries, through directed government spending of a given government budget. Obviously, maximization implies efficient spending in this case. Thus we obtain a benchmark for assessing the efficiency of actual spending. References Stiglitz, J.E., A. Sen and J.-P. Fitoussi (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.The approach consists of two stages. The first stage is concerned with the econometric estimation of a linear model that links variation in the policy instruments to the corresponding variation in the individual components of the HDI in a given general environment implicitly defined by a set of exogenous variables, such as population structure, the HIV-rate or colonial ancestry. Using the method of Seemingly Unrelated Regression, we estimate the contribution of each instrument to each target as part of a simultaneous equations system. As a bonus, we obtain the covariance matrix of the parameter estimates. In a second stage, we use these estimation results, including the covariance matrix of the parameter estimates, to define a portfolio-selection problem, known from financial optimum portfolio analysis. In our case, however, the distribution of a given budget of government expenditures over the three HDI components constitutes the portfolio selection problem, rather than distributing funds over a portfolio of financial assets. An efficient portfolio minimizes the variance in the HDI for a given expected value of the HDI.We are able to calculate efficient HDI portfolios by varying the degree of risk-aversion over a preset range, and tracing the corresponding set of optimum portfolios which are necessarily efficient as well. This set can be interpreted as the hull of all feasible portfolios in the Variance-HDI-plane. This set turns out to be convex, as in ordinary financial portfolio applications. We also show how, as the budget increases, these efficient portfolios move through the Variance-HDI-plane in a North-Easterly direction in most cases, following convex expansion paths for a given level of risk-aversion, indicating a more than proportional increase of Variance for a given increase in HDI. In some cases we find that these expansion paths are U-shaped, suggesting that there is a double dividend in expanding a low total budget in terms of HDI gained and Variance lost, or a ‘double punishment’ for decreasing an already low budget. In most cases we find that actual HDI performance lags significantly behind the HDI range achievable through efficient spending of the actual available budget. Our approach enables us to indicate how existing budgets should then be reallocated and how much would be gained in terms of the accompanying improvement in the HDI. In most countries higher budget shares should be allocated to both health and education, leaving a smaller share for general spending, which corresponds to the standard-of-living component of the HDI measured by GDP per capita. In addition, we are able to show how much extra HDI and corresponding Variance an additional dollar spent would be able to generate, assuming that dollar would be spent efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Svenja Wiebe & Adriaan van Zon, 2011. "Efficient Development Portfolio Design for Sub-Saharan Africa," EcoMod2011 2788, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:2788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/vanZon_Wiebe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perrot, Radhika & Filippov, Sergey, 2010. "Localisation strategies of firms in wind energy technology development," MERIT Working Papers 2010-047, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. George Mavrotas, 2009. "Introduction: Development Aid-Theory, Policies, and Performance," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(s1), pages 373-381, August.
    3. Ms. Keiko Honjo & Marijn Verhoeven & Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, 1997. "The Efficiency of Government Expenditure: Experiences From Africa," IMF Working Papers 1997/153, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Aschauer, David Alan, 1989. "Is public expenditure productive?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 177-200, March.
    5. Zon, Adriaan van & Mupela, Evans, 2010. "Endogenous Economic Growth through Connectivity," MERIT Working Papers 2010-001, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Raghuram G. Rajan & Arvind Subramanian, 2005. "What Undermines Aid's Impact on Growth?," NBER Working Papers 11657, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Ziesemer, Thomas H.W., 2010. "The impact of the credit crisis on poor developing countries: Growth, worker remittances, accumulation and migration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1230-1245, September.
    8. Barro, Robert J, 1990. "Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 103-126, October.
    9. Santiago-Rodriguez, Fernando, 2010. "Human resource management and learning for innovation: pharmaceuticals in Mexico," MERIT Working Papers 2010-002, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Swaroop, Vinaya & Heng-fu, Zou, 1996. "The composition of public expenditure and economic growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 313-344, April.
    11. Herrera, Santiago & Pang, Gaobo, 2005. "Efficiency of public spending in developing countries : an efficiency frontier approach," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3645, The World Bank.
    12. Jayasuriya, Ruwan & Wodon, Quentin, 2003. "Measuring and Explaining Country Efficiency in Improving Health and Education Indicators," MPRA Paper 11183, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Berenger, Valerie & Verdier-Chouchane, Audrey, 2007. "Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being: Standard of Living and Quality of Life Across Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1259-1276, July.
    14. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Lerner, Josh, 2010. "The Financing of R&D and Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-639, Elsevier.
    15. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    16. Paul A. Samuelson, 2011. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & Edward O Thorp & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE KELLY CAPITAL GROWTH INVESTMENT CRITERION THEORY and PRACTICE, chapter 31, pages 465-472, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Gomanee, Karuna & Morrissey, Oliver & Mosley, Paul & Verschoor, Arjan, 2005. "Aid, Government Expenditure, and Aggregate Welfare," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 355-370, March.
    18. Luis R. Murillo‐Zamorano, 2004. "Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 33-77, February.
    19. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    20. Herrera, Santiago, 2007. "Public expenditure and growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4372, The World Bank.
    21. Sagar, Ambuj D. & Najam, Adil, 1998. "The human development index: a critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 249-264, June.
    22. Fan, Shenggen & Rao, Neetha, 2003. "Public spending in developing countries: trends, determination, and impact," EPTD discussion papers 99, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge & McNab, Robert M., 2003. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 1597-1616, September.
    2. Ablam Estel APETI & Bao-We-Wal BAMBE & Jean Louis COMBES, 2022. "On the Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Reforms : Fiscal Rules and Public Expenditure Efficiency," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2985, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    3. Fiseha Gebregziabher & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa, 2014. "Social Spending and Aggregate Welfare in Developing and Transition Economies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-082, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Gebregziabher, Fiseha & Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel, 2014. "Social spending and aggregate welfare in developing and transition economies," WIDER Working Paper Series 082, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Akcomak, Semih & Stoneman, Paul, 2010. "How novel is social capital: Three cases from the British history that reflect social capital," MERIT Working Papers 2010-015, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. S Tharshan & W L M A Liyanage & P G K Nilanka & E A Selvanathan & M Jayasinghe and S Selvanathan, 2019. "The Impact of Sectoral Government Expenditure on Economic Growth: Evidence from Sri Lanka," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201902, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    7. Hafedh Bouakez & Michel Guillard & Jordan Roulleau-Pasdeloup, 2017. "Public Investment, Time to Build, and the Zero Lower Bound," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 23, pages 60-79, January.
    8. Garikai Makuyana & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2019. "Public and private investment and economic growth in Malawi: an ARDL-bounds testing approach," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 673-689, January.
    9. Briec, Walter & Kerstens, Kristiaan, 2009. "Multi-horizon Markowitz portfolio performance appraisals: A general approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 50-62, February.
    10. Julien Malizard, 2014. "Dépenses militaires et croissance économique dans un contexte non linéaire. Le cas français," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 65(3), pages 601-618.
    11. John Y. Campbell & Yeung Lewis Chanb & M. Viceira, 2013. "A multivariate model of strategic asset allocation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part II, chapter 39, pages 809-848, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Yawovi Mawussé Isaac Amedanou, 2022. "Financing the economy in debt times: the crucial role of public-private partnerships," Working Papers hal-03545244, HAL.
    13. Chen, Jia & Li, Degui & Linton, Oliver & Lu, Zudi, 2016. "Semiparametric dynamic portfolio choice with multiple conditioning variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 309-318.
    14. Silvia Bertarelli, 2006. "Public capital and growth," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 361-398.
    15. Clemens, Christiane & Soretz, Susanne, 1999. "Konsequenzen des Zins- und Einkommensrisikos auf das wirtschaftliche Wachstum," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-221, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    16. Tarhan, Simge, 2008. "Public Investment and Corruption in an Endogenous Growth Model," MPRA Paper 21319, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Mar 2010.
    17. Mujaheed Shaikh & Afschin Gandjour, 2019. "Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 101-122, January.
    18. Lin, Wen-chang & Lu, Jin-ray, 2012. "Risky asset allocation and consumption rule in the presence of background risk and insurance markets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 150-158.
    19. Li, Zhongfei & Yao, Jing & Li, Duan, 2010. "Behavior patterns of investment strategies under Roy's safety-first principle," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 167-179, May.
    20. Alptekin, Aynur & Levine, Paul, 2012. "Military expenditure and economic growth: A meta-analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 636-650.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    29 Sub-Saharan African countries: Benin; Botswana; Burkina Faso; Burundi; Cameroon; Chad; Comoros; Republic of Congo; Ivory Coast; Equatorial Guinea; Ethiopia; The Gambia; Ghana; Guinea-Bisseau; Lesotho; Madagascar; Malawi; Mali; Mauritania; Mauritius; Namibia; Niger; Rwanda; Senegal; South Africa; Swaziland; Togo; Uganda; Zambia.; Developing countries; Public finance and tax issues;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002625:2788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.