IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Sequence Matter in Free Trade Area?

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Jong Eun

Abstract

Economically, geo-politically, culturally, and even historically, Korea is surrounded by her major trading partners, i.e., China, Japan, and the United States. In regard to Free Trade Area (FTA), Korea is currently negotiating with Chile that is chosen partly because Korea-Chile Free Trade Area is expected to give the smallest adverse effects on each economy. As long as Korea is on the track of trade liberalization, Korea should consider an FTA with her major trading partners, China, Japan, and the United States in the foreseeable future. At that point, pros and cons will come to the surface, consequently, we will want for sound judgments. Identifying dynamic effects by induced capital formation, this paper at least answers which country should be the first FTA partner for Korea, and which sequence is favorably related to her growth. China, Japan, and the United States are the object of investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Jong Eun, 2002. "Does Sequence Matter in Free Trade Area?," Conference papers 331010, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331010/files/262.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hertel, Thomas W & Masters, William A & Elbehri, Aziz, 1998. "The Uruguay Round and Africa: A Global, General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 7(2), pages 208-236, July.
    2. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    3. Jaime de MELO & Sherman ROBINSON, 2015. "Product Differentiation And The Treatment Of Foreign Trade In Computable General Equilibrium Models Of Small Economies," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 2, pages 21-41, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Lewis, Jeffrey D & Robinson, Sherman, 1993. "External Shocks, Purchasing Power Parity, and the Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 7(1), pages 45-63, January.
    5. Devaragan, Shantayanan & Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman, 1990. "Policy lessons from trade-focused, two-sector models," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 625-657.
    6. repec:fth:michin:311 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Arvind Panagariya, 2000. "Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 287-331, June.
    8. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus multilateralism," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1687, The World Bank.
    9. Hinojosa-Ojeda, Raul A. & Robinson, Sherman & Lewis, Jeffrey D., 1995. "Regional integration options for Central America and the Caribbean after NAFTA," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 121-148.
    10. Brown, D.K., 1992. "The Impact of a North American Free Trade Area: Applied General Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 311, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2002. "Trade liberalisation and regional integration: the search for large numbers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1-20.
    2. Gonzalez–Mellado, Aida, 2006. "Assessment of Poverty Impacts of Trade Liberalization by Integration of Household Analysis in CGE Models: Possibilities and Perspectives," Conference papers 331521, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 1999. "After the negotiations: assessing the impact of free trade agreements in Southern Africa," TMD discussion papers 46, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    5. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2008. "Asian Growth and Trade Poles: India, China, and East and Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 210-234, February.
    6. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    7. Scott McDonald & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2007. "Globe: A SAM Based Global CGE Model using GTAP Data," Departmental Working Papers 14, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    8. Sugiyarto, Guntur & Sinclair, M. Thea & Blake, Adam, 2001. "The Economic Effects and Distributional Implications of Globalisation and Foreign Tourism Boom in the Indonesian Economy: A CGE Assessment," Conference papers 330925, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Jeffrey D. Lewis & Sherman Robinson & Karen Thierfelder, 2003. "Free Trade Agreements and the SADC Economies," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 12(2), pages 156-206, June.
    10. Sherman Robinson & Zhi Wang & Will Martin, 2002. "Capturing the Implications of Services Trade Liberalization," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 3-33.
    11. Haita, Corina, 2011. "An Emissions Trading Scheme with Auctioning," Conference papers 332086, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Karen Thierfelder & Sherman Robinson, 2003. "Trade and Tradability: Exports, Imports, and Factor Markets in the Salter‐Swan Model," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(244), pages 103-111, March.
    13. Sonmez, Yontem & McDonald, Scott, 2012. "An EU-ASEAN Free Trade Area with a focus on Singapore and Malaysia," Conference papers 332221, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Dixon, Peter B. & Honkatukia, Juha & Rimmer, Maureen T., 2011. "The marginal costs of funds in the VATTAGE model of Finland: a back of the envelope justification of the welfare effects of additional government revenue," Conference papers 332135, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Adkins, Liwayway G. & Garbaccio, Richard F., 2007. "Coordinating Global Trade and Environmental Policy: The Role of Pre-Existing Distortions," Conference papers 331592, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. McDonald, Scott & Thierfelder, Karen & Walmsley, Terrie, 2014. "Factor Market Flexibility and the Implications of Trade Policy Reforms," Conference papers 332469, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2000. "Small countries and the case for regionalism vs. multilateralism," TMD discussion papers 54, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    18. Lewis, Jeffrey D.*Robinson, Sherman, 1996. "Partners or predators? : the impact of regional trade liberalization on Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1626, The World Bank.
    19. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2006. "Impact of switching production to bioenergy crops: The switchgrass example," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 243-265, March.
    20. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Robinson, Sherman, 2013. "Contribution of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling to Policy Formulation in Developing Countries," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 277-301, Elsevier.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.