Measuring The Costs Of Foodborne Diseases: A Review And Classification Of The Literature
AbstractThe food scandals and foodborne disease outbreaks in recent years have increased the demand for food safety and have led policy makers once more to tighten the safety regulations in the food supply chain. Obviously, an adequate balance between the costs of foodborne diseases and the costs and benefits of improved food safety is not static but time-varying and depends very much on specific situations. Given the complexity of an economic assessment of food safety, it is not surprising that the literature in this field mainly analyses particular stages but not the complete food supply chain from the farm to the consumer. This paper focuses on the costs of foodborne diseases and aims to review and classify the existing literature along a set of certain evaluation criteria. Our main findings are that most studies so far have been conducted in the USA and the UK. The reviewed studies consider mainly the consumption level of the supply chain, focus on tangible costs, examine budgetary costs and costs of individuals, and make use of the cost-of-illness approach.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA) in its series 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 with number 138195.
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
food safety; food scandals; costs of foodborne diseases; food supply chain; Lebensmittelsicherheit; Lebensmittelskandale; Kosten von lebensmittelbedingten Erkrankungen; Lebensmittelwarenkette; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- van Ravenswaay, Eileen O., 1995. "Chapter 01: VALUING FOOD SAFETY AND NUTRITION: THE RESEARCH NEEDS," Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition (1995), Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance, number 25976.
- Roberts, Tanya & Marks, Suzanne, 1995. "Chapter 09: VALUATION BY THE COST OF ILLNESS METHOD: THE SOCIAL COSTS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 FOODBORNE DISEASE," Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition (1995), Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance, number 25977.
- Brennan, John P. & Thorne, Fiona S. & Kelly, Paul W. & Murray, Gordon M., 2004. "Defining the Costs of an Outbreak of Karnal Bunt of Wheat," 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia 58382, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
- Latouche, K. & Rainelli, P. & Vermersch, D., 1998. "Food safety issues and the BSE scare: some lessons from the French case," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 347-356, October.
- Bera, Asit Kumar & Bhattacharya, Debasis & Pan, D. & Dhara, A. & Kumar, Satish & Das, S.K., 2010. "Evaluation of Economic Losses due to Coccidiosis in Poultry Industry in India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 23(1).
- Steahr, Thomas E. & Roberts, Tanya, 1993. "Microbial Foodborne Disease: Hospitalizations, Medical Costs and Potential Demand for Safer Food," Working Papers 116110, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
- Richard Bennett, 2003. "The 'Direct Costs'of Livestock Disease: The Development of a System of Models for the Analysis of 30 Endemic Livestock Diseases in Great Britain," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 55-71.
- Harrington, Winston & Portney, Paul R., 1987. "Valuing the benefits of health and safety regulation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 101-112, July.
- Sockett, Paul, 1993. "Social and economic aspects of food-borne disease," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 110-119, April.
- Shiell, Alan & Gerard, Karen & Donaldson, Cam, 1987. "Cost of illness studies: An aid to decision-making?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 317-323, December.
- Rodriguez, Elsa M. & Lacaze, Maria Victoria & Lupin, Beatriz, 2008.
"Contingent Valuation of Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay for Organic Food in Argentina,"
2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium
43947, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
- Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Lacaze, María Victoria & Lupín, Beatriz, 2008. "Contingent valuation of consumers' willingness-to-pay for organic food in Argentina," NÃ¼lan. Deposited Documents 1022, Centro de Documentación, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
- Kuchler, Fred & Golan, Elise H., 1999. "Assigning Values To Life: Comparing Methods For Valuing Health Risks," Agricultural Economics Reports 34037, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.