IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare20/305238.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Machine learning for optimizing complex site-specific management

Author

Listed:
  • Saikai, Yuji
  • Patel, Vivak
  • Mitchell, Paul

Abstract

Despite the promise of precision agriculture for increasing the productivity by implementing site-specific management, farmers remain skeptical and its utilization rate is lower than expected. A major cause is a lack of concrete approaches to higher profitability. When involving many variables in both controlled management and monitored environment, optimal site-specific management for such high-dimensional cropping systems is considerably more complex than the traditional low-dimensional cases widely studied in the existing literature, calling for a paradigm shift in optimization of site-specific management. We propose an algorithmic approach that enables farmers to efficiently learn their own site-specific management through on-farm experiments. We test its performance in two simulated scenarios---one of medium complexity with 150 management variables and one of high complexity with 864 management variables. Results show that, relative to uniform management, site-specific management learned from 5-year experiments generates $43/ha higher profits with 25 kg/ha less nitrogen fertilizer in the first scenario and $40/ha higher profits with 55 kg/ha less nitrogen fertilizer in the second scenario. Thus, complex site-specific management can be learned efficiently and be more profitable and environmentally sustainable than uniform management.

Suggested Citation

  • Saikai, Yuji & Patel, Vivak & Mitchell, Paul, 2020. "Machine learning for optimizing complex site-specific management," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305238, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare20:305238
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305238/files/73Machinelearningforoptimizingcomplexsite-specificmanagement.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Eunchun & Brorsen, Wade & Li, Xiaofei, 2018. "How to Use Yield Monitor Data to Determine Nitrogen Recommendations : Bayesian Kriging for Location Specific Parameter Estimates," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274349, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Luc Anselin & Rodolfo Bongiovanni & Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer, 2004. "A Spatial Econometric Approach to the Economics of Site-Specific Nitrogen Management in Corn Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(3), pages 675-687.
    3. Frederic Ouedraogo & B. Wade Brorsen, 2018. "Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of a Stochastic Plateau Response Function: Determining Optimal Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(1), pages 87-102, March.
    4. Duffy, Michael, 2013. "2013 Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa," Staff General Research Papers Archive 35999, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Meyer-Aurich, Andreas & Weersink, Alfons & Gandorfer, Markus & Wagner, Peter, 2010. "Optimal site-specific fertilization and harvesting strategies with respect to crop yield and quality response to nitrogen," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 478-485, September.
    6. Schimmelpfennig, David, 2016. "Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Economic Research Report 249773, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Boyer, Christopher N. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Solie, John B. & Raun, William R., 2010. "Profitability of Conventional vs. Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Wheat Production," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56405, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Bullock, David S. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, Jess & Swinton, Scott M., 2002. "Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site-specific yield response," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 233-245, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dhivya Elavarasan & Durai Raj Vincent P M & Kathiravan Srinivasan & Chuan-Yu Chang, 2020. "A Hybrid CFS Filter and RF-RFE Wrapper-Based Feature Extraction for Enhanced Agricultural Crop Yield Prediction Modeling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Queiroz, Pedro W. V. & Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Bullock, David S., 2023. "An Expected Value of Sample Information (EVSI) Approach for Estimating the Payoff from a Variable Rate Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    2. Späti, Karin & Huber, Robert & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Benefits of Increasing Information Accuracy in Variable Rate Technologies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    4. Khanna, Madhu, 2021. "Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Agriculture: Opportunities and Challenges," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315052, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Velandia, Margarita M. & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Segarra, Eduardo & Bronson, Kevin, 2006. "Economics of Management Zone Delineation in Cotton Precision Agriculture," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25783, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Mkondiwa, Maxwell Gibson, 2015. "Whither Broad or Spatially Specific Fertilizer Recommendations?," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 237344, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. David S. Bullock & James Lowenberg‐DeBoer, 2007. "Using Spatial Analysis to Study the Values of Variable Rate Technology and Information," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 517-535, September.
    8. Silvia Macchia, 2022. "Unbundling the information needs of new-generation agricultural companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 117-141.
    9. Li, Xiaofei & Coble, Keith H. & Tack, Jesse B. & Barnett, Barry J., 2016. "Estimating Site-Specific Crop Yield Response using Varying Coefficient Models," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235798, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Velandia Margarita & Roderick M. Rejesus & Eduardo Segarra & Kevin Bronson, 2004. "Un análisis económico de la aproximación estadística para el establecimiento de zonas de manejo en agricultura de precisión: caso de algodón en Texas," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, September.
    11. Sharp, Benjamin E. & Miller, Shelie A., 2014. "Estimating maximum land use change potential from a regional biofuel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 261-269.
    12. Khanna, Madhu & Atallah, Shadi & Kar, Saurajyoti & Sharma, Bijay & Wu, Linghui & Yu, Chengzheng, 2021. "Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Agriculture in the US: Opportunities and Challenges," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 313799, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. DeLay, Nathan & Comstock, Haden, 2021. "Recent Trends in PA Technology Adoption and Bundling in CornProduction: Implications for Farm Consolidation," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    14. Klaus Moeltner & A. Ford Ramsey & Clinton L. Neill, 2021. "Bayesian Kinked Regression with Unobserved Thresholds: An Application to the von Liebig Hypothesis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(5), pages 1832-1856, October.
    15. Johannes Munz & Heinrich Schuele, 2022. "Influencing the Success of Precision Farming Technology Adoption—A Model-Based Investigation of Economic Success Factors in Small-Scale Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Lambert, Dayton M. & Malzer, Gary L. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2004. "General Moment And Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Of A Spatially Autocorrelated System Of Equations: An Empirical Example Using On-Farm Precision Agriculture Data," Staff Papers 28667, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Lambert, Dayton M. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James & Malzer, Gary L., 2005. "Managing Phosphorous Soil Dynamics Over Space And Time," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19452, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. LoPiccalo, Katherine, 2022. "Impact of broadband penetration on U.S. Farm productivity: A panel approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    19. Uri Shani & Yacov Tsur & Amos Zemel & David Zilberman, 2009. "Irrigation production functions with water‐capital substitution," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(1), pages 55-66, January.
    20. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare20:305238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.