This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Comparing Theories Of Endogenous Protection: Bayesian Comparison Of Tobit Models Using Gibbs Sampling Output Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Kishore Gawande
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
Bayesian inference and model comparisons are easily performed quite accurately using Gibbs sampling, even if (1) the likelihood is analytically intractable and (2) nonstandard prior probability density functions (pdfs) are required. In this study Bayesian model comparisons are performed among five competing theories of endogenous protection. Tariff and nontariff barrier data from 1983 between the United States and five OECD partner countries-Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom-are used in the analysis. Posterior odds based on two priors show special-interest models to be more likely than other models in determining U.S. protection. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technolog
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by MIT Press in its journal The Review of Economics and Statistics .
Volume (Year): 80 (1998)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
Pages: 128-140
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:80:y:1998:i:1:p:128-140Contact details of provider: Web page: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/
Order Information: Web: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journal-home.tcl?issn=00346535
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Other versions of this item:
Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)Mirabelle Muuls & Dimitra Petropoulou, 2007.
"A Swing-State Theory of Trade Protection in the Electoral College ,"
Economics Series Working Papers
372, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Scott Bradford, 2000.
"Rents, Votes, and Protection: Explaining the Structure of Trade Barriers Across Industries ,"
Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers
1717, Econometric Society.
[Downloadable!]
Kishore Gawande & Pravin Krishna & Michael J. Robbins, 2004.
"Foreign Lobbies and US Trade Policy ,"
NBER Working Papers
10205, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: C. Charles Okeahalam, 2006.
"Production Efficiency in the South African Banking Sector: A Stochastic Analysis ,"
International Review of Applied Economics ,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 103-123, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
kishore gawande & pravin krishna, 2005.
"The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Empirical Approaches ,"
International Trade
0503003, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
alok k. bohara & alejandro islas camargo & theresa grijalva & kishore gawande, 2005.
"Fundamental dimensions of U.S. trade policy ,"
International Trade
0505001, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Bohara, Alok K. & Camargo, Alejandro Islas & Grijalva, Therese & Gawande, Kishore, 2005.
"Fundamental dimensions of U.S. trade policy ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 93-125, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Susumu Imai & Hajime Katayama & Kala Krishna, 2007.
"Is Protection Really for Sale? A Survey and Directions for Future Research ,"
Working Papers
1151, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Susumu Imai & Hajime Katayama & Kala Krishna, 2008.
"Is Protection Really for Sale? A Survey and Directions for Future Research ,"
NBER Working Papers
13899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Imai, Susumu & Katayama, Hajime & Krishna, Kala, 2009.
"Is protection really for sale? A survey and directions for future research ,"
International Review of Economics & Finance ,
Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 181-191, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Marianna Belloc, 2007.
"Protection for Sale in the EU ,"
Working Papers
100, Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Public Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Access and
download statistics Did you know? A tutorial is available.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .