Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Thinking about need: Public spending on the regions

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ross Mackay
  • Jonathan Williams

Abstract

MacKay R. R. and Williams J. (2005) Thinking about need: public spending on the regions, Regional Studies 39 , 815-828. The UK Treasury accepts that need is the correct guide to spending on public services in different parts of the UK. But the formula used to decide changes in devolved spending in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland depends on the population: it does not compensate for differences in need. With devolved spending determined by need, there would be consistency across 11 of the 12 UK regions. London would be the sole exception. The heavy cost of the capital's public services is part of the argument for a more even distribution of income, wealth and employment.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400500213812
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 39 (2005)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Pages: 815-828

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:39:y:2005:i:6:p:815-828

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CRES20

Related research

Keywords: Automatic stabilizers; Need; National solidarity; Devolved spending; London paradox; Stabilisateurs automatiques; Besoin; Solidarite; Depense regionalisee; Paradoxe de Londres; Automatische Stabilisatoren; Bedurftigkeit; uberregionale Solidaritat; dezentralisierte Ausgaben; das Paradox London; Estabilizadores automaticos; Necesidad; Solidaridad nacional; Gastos descentralizados; Paradoja londinense; JEL classifications: R1; R5; H2; H7;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Simon Burgess & Denise Gossage & Carol Propper, 2003. "Explaining differences in hospital performance: Does the answer lie in the labour market?," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 03/091, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. repec:rdg:wpaper:em-dp2007-48 is not listed on IDEAS
  2. Yannis Psycharis, 2008. "Public Spending Patterns: the regional allocation of public investment in Greece by political period," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 14, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:39:y:2005:i:6:p:815-828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.