IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v40y2006i8p937-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective One Funding in the UK: A Critical Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Gripaios
  • Paul Bishop

Abstract

Gripaios P. and Bishop P. (2006) Objective One funding in the UK: a critical assessment, Regional Studies 40, 937-951. The paper examines several issues that question the underlying basis of UK Objective One funding. First, it is doubtful that the current qualifying regions are appropriate territories over which to apply the eligibility criterion for funding. Second, it is debatable whether gross domestic product (GDP)/gross value added (GVA) per capita should be the only criterion used to justify aid. Third, a lack of statistical reliability implies that there is little confidence that all the current regions are the only appropriate funding recipients. Finally, it is questionable whether funding can have much impact given the extent of underlying structural problems and flaws in the focus of the programme. Gripaios P. et Bishop P. (2006) Le financement au R-U selon l'Objectif I: une critique, Regional Studies 40, 937-951. Cet article cherche a examiner divers problemes qui remettent en question la base sous-jacente du financement au R-U selon l'Objectif I. Primo, on doute que les regions actuellement eligibles soient des territoires bien delimites en termes des criteres qu'il faut satisfaire. Secundo, on peut se demander si, oui ou non, le PIB/VAB par tete devraient etre les seuls criteres employes afin de justifier l'aide financiere. Tertio, un manque de donnees fiables laissent supposer que rien ne prouve que toutes les regions delimitees sont les seules beneficiaires de l'aide financiere appropriee. Pour finir, on remet en question si, oui ou non, le financement pourrait avoir beaucoup d'impact etant donne l'importance des problemes structurels sous-jacents et les defauts dans le point central du programme. Regions au R-U selon l'Objectif I Delimitation des regions Indicateurs regionaux Defauts dans les fonds structurels Gripaios P. und Bishop P. (2006) Ziel-1-Finanzierung im UK: eine kritische Untersuchung, Regional Studies 40, 937-951. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht mehrere Tatsachen, welche die zugrunde liegende Basis der Ziel-1-Finanzierung UK in Frage stellen. Erstens ist es zweifelhaft, ob die gegenwartig berechtigten Regionen geeignete Gebiete fur die Anwendung der Berechtigungskriterien darstellen. Zweitens ist es fraglich, ob Bruttoinlandsprodukt bzw. die Bruttowertschopfung pro Kopf das einzige Kriterium sein sollte, das zur Rechtfertigung von Unterstutzung benutzt wird. Drittens lasst mangelnde statistische Zuverlassigkeit darauf schliessen, dass man nicht unbedingt von der ausschliesslichen Empfangsberechtigung aller derzeitigen Nutzniesser uberzeugt ist. Letztlich ist es umstritten, ob Finanzierung angesichts der zugrunde liegenden Strukturprobleme und Ungenauigkeiten im Kern des Programms viel Erfolg haben kann. Ziel-1-Regionen im UK Regionalbestimmungen Regionale Indikatoren Schwachen der Strukturfonds Gripaios P. y Bishop P. (2006) Fondos del Objetivo Uno en el Reino Unido: una valoracion critica, Regional Studies 40, 937-951. En este ensayo examinamos diferentes cuestiones que ponen en duda las bases subyacentes de los fondos del Objectivo Uno en el Reino Unido. En primer lugar, es dudoso que las actuales regiones cualificadas sean territorios apropiados en las que aplicar el criterio de aptitud para la financiacion. En segundo lugar, es debatible que el PIB/VAB per capita deba ser el unico criterio utilizado para justificar el subsidio. En tercer lugar, debido a la falta de fiabilidad estadistica hay poca confianza de que las actuales regiones sean las unicas para recibir una financiacion adecuada. Para terminar, es cuestionable que la financiacion pueda tener mayor impacto dada la magnitud de los problemas estructurales subyacentes y la falta de enfoque en el programa. Regiones de Objetivo Uno en el Reino Unido Definiciones regionales Indicadores regionales Debilidades en el fondo estructural

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Gripaios & Paul Bishop, 2006. "Objective One Funding in the UK: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 937-951.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:8:p:937-951
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400600877839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400600877839
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400600877839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Martin, 1998. "Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?," Post-Print hal-03416388, HAL.
    2. Paul Cheshire & Stefano Magrini, 2000. "Endogenous Processes in European Regional Growth: Convergence and Policy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 455-479.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9343 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Aadne Cappelen & Fulvio Castellacci & Jan Fagerberg & Bart Verspagen, 2003. "The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 621-644, September.
    5. Philippe Martin, 1999. "Are European regional policies delivering?," Post-Print hal-01011168, HAL.
    6. Andrew Henley, 2005. "On regional growth convergence in Great Britain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 1245-1260.
    7. Gillian Bristow & Peter Gripaios & Max Munday, 1999. "Financial and Business Services and Uneven Economic Development: Some Welsh Evidence," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 90(2), pages 156-167, May.
    8. Philippe Martin, 1998. "Can Regional Policies Affect Growth and Geography in Europe?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(6), pages 757-774, August.
    9. Peter Gripaios & Max Munday, 2000. "Uneven Development in UK Financial Services: The Case of the South West and Wales," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 153-180, January.
    10. Iain McLean & Alistair McMillan, 2003. "The Distribution of Public Expenditure across the UK Regions," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 45-71, March.
    11. Andres RodrIguez-Pose & Ugo Fratesi†, 2004. "Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 97-113.
    12. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 1999. "Convergence or Divergence? Types of Regional Responses to Socio‐Economic Change in Western Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 90(4), pages 365-378, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Di Cataldo, Marco & Giua, Mara, 2020. "It’s not about the money. EU funds, local opportunities, and Euroscepticism," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Marco Di Cataldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2020. "Regional needs, regional targeting and regional growth: an assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 35-47, January.
    3. Anastasios Kitsos & Paul Bishop, 2018. "Economic resilience in Great Britain: the crisis impact and its determining factors for local authority districts," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 329-347, March.
    4. Giuseppe Terzo, 2021. "Social capital, social economy and economic resilience of Italian provinces," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(5), pages 1113-1135, October.
    5. Tony Gore, 2014. "The Role of Policy Champions and Learning in Implementing Horizontal Environmental Policy Integration: Comparative Insights from European Structural Fund Programmes in the U.K," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Chiara Del Bo & Massimo Florio & Giancarlo Manzi, 2010. "Regional Infrastructure and Convergence: Growth Implications in a Spatial Framework," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 17(3), pages 475-493, September.
    7. Marco Di Cataldo, 2016. "Gaining and losing EU Objective 1 funds: Regional development in Britain and the prospect of Brexit," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 120, European Institute, LSE.
    8. Marco Di Cataldo & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2018. "An assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in the UK regions: direct effects and the dividend of targeting," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 135, European Institute, LSE.
    9. Joanie Willett & Rebecca Tidy & Garry Tregidga & Philip Passmore, 2019. "Why did Cornwall vote for Brexit? Assessing the implications for EU structural funding programmes," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1343-1360, December.
    10. Rhys Jones & Bryonny Goodwin‐Hawkins & Michael Woods, 2020. "From Territorial Cohesion to Regional Spatial Justice: The Well‐Being of Future Generations Act in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 894-912, September.
    11. Sonja Đuričin & Isidora Beraha & Olivera Jovanović & Marija Mosurović Ružičić & Marija Lazarević-Moravčević & Mihailo Paunović, 2022. "The Efficiency of National Innovation Policy Programs: The Case of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Fratesi, Ugo, 2002. "Unbalanced development strategies and the lack of regional convergence in the EU," ERSA conference papers ersa02p415, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Dahl, Juliana, 2013. "Innovation and growth in regions with specific geographical features," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 463, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Andres RodrIguez-Pose & Ugo Fratesi†, 2004. "Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 97-113.
    4. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2016. "EU cohesion policy, past and present: Sustaining a prospering and fair European Union?," Kiel Working Papers 2037, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Elburz, Zeynep & Nijkamp, Peter & Pels, Eric, 2017. "Public infrastructure and regional growth: Lessons from meta-analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Stavros Rodokanakis, 2006. "“How Effective are the Regional Policies of Convergence in the EU?”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 59-74.
    7. Zsuzsanna Tron, 2009. "Examining the impact of European regional policy," IWE Working Papers 188, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    8. Sarantis Lolos, 2009. "The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth: assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990–2005," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 211-228, August.
    9. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2015. "In Tandem for Cohesion? Synergies and Conflicts between Regional and Agricultural Policies of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 681-704, April.
    10. Zsuzsanna Tron, 2009. "Evaluation Methods of European Regional Policy and Reasons for Different Outcomes," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 12(32), pages 149-185, (2).
    11. Enrico Fabrizi & Gianni Guastella & Stefano Marta & Francesco Timpano, 2016. "Determinants of Intra-Distribution Dynamics in European Regions: An Empirical Assessment of the Role of Structural Intervention," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 522-539, December.
    12. Marco PERCOCO, 2005. "The Impact Of Structural Funds On The Italian Mezzogiorno, 1994-1999," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 21, pages 141-153.
    13. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Fabio Pierangeli, 2011. "Synergies and conflicts between EU policies and the objective of territorial cohesion," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0132, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    14. Riccardo regstdcenzi, 2009. "Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 111-133.
    15. Peter Wostner, 2003. "Regional Disparities in Transition Economies: the case of Slovenia," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2003(1).
    16. Salima Bouayad-Agha & Nadine Turpin & Lionel Védrine, 2010. "Fostering the potential endogenous development of European regions: a spatial dynamic panel data analysis of the Cohesion Policy on regional convergence over the period 1980-2005," TEPP Working Paper 2010-17, TEPP.
    17. George Petrakos & Panagiotis Artelaris, 2009. "European Regional Convergence Revisited: A Weighted Least Squares Approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 314-331, June.
    18. Rodriguez-Oreggia, Eduardo & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres, 2004. "The Regional Returns of Public Investment Policies in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1545-1562, September.
    19. Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene, 2007. "Regional policy design: An analysis of relocation, efficiency and equity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 1443-1467, August.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/9328 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Lammers, Konrad & Stiller, Silvia, 2000. "Regionalpolitische Implikationen der neuen ökonomischen Geographie," HWWA Discussion Papers 85, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:8:p:937-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.