IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v31y2020i6d10.1007_s10845-019-01522-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imbalanced fault diagnosis of rotating machinery via multi-domain feature extraction and cost-sensitive learning

Author

Listed:
  • Qifa Xu

    (School of Management, Hefei University of Technology
    Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education)

  • Shixiang Lu

    (School of Management, Hefei University of Technology)

  • Weiyin Jia

    (Anhui Ronds Science & Technology Incorporated Company)

  • Cuixia Jiang

    (School of Management, Hefei University of Technology)

Abstract

Fault diagnosis plays an essential role in rotating machinery manufacturing systems to reduce their maintenance costs. How to improve diagnosis accuracy remains an open issue. To this end, we develop a novel framework through combined use of multi-domain vibration feature extraction, feature selection and cost-sensitive learning method. First, we extract time-domain, frequency-domain, and time-frequency-domain features to make full use of vibration signals. Second, a feature selection technique is employed to obtain a feature subset with good generalization properties, by simultaneously measuring the relevance and redundancy of features. Third, a cost-sensitive learning method is designed for a classifier to effectively learn the discriminating boundaries, with an extremely imbalanced distribution of fault instances. For illustration, a real-world dataset of rotating machinery collected from an oil refinery in China is utilized. The extensive experiments have demonstrated that our multi-domain feature extraction and feature selection can significantly improve the diagnosis accuracy. Meanwhile, our cost-sensitive learning method consistently outperforms the traditional classifiers such as support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), etc., and even better than the classification method calibrated by six popular imbalanced data resampling algorithms, such as the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and the Adaptive Synthetic sampling method (ADASYN), in terms of decreasing missed alarms and reducing the average cost. Owing to its high evaluation scores and low average misclassification cost, cost-sensitive GBDT (CS-GBDT) is preferred for imbalanced fault diagnosis in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Qifa Xu & Shixiang Lu & Weiyin Jia & Cuixia Jiang, 2020. "Imbalanced fault diagnosis of rotating machinery via multi-domain feature extraction and cost-sensitive learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1467-1481, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01522-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-019-01522-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-019-01522-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-019-01522-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng Gan & Cong Wang & Chang’an Zhu, 2018. "Fault feature enhancement for rotating machinery based on quality factor analysis and manifold learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 463-480, February.
    2. Ahmed Ragab & Soumaya Yacout & Mohamed-Salah Ouali & Hany Osman, 2019. "Prognostics of multiple failure modes in rotating machinery using a pattern-based classifier and cumulative incidence functions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 255-274, January.
    3. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cuixia Jiang & Hao Chen & Qifa Xu & Xiangxiang Wang, 2023. "Few-shot fault diagnosis of rotating machinery with two-branch prototypical networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1667-1681, April.
    2. Jin, Zhenglei & Xu, Qifa & Jiang, Cuixia & Wang, Xiangxiang & Chen, Hao, 2023. "Ordinal few-shot learning with applications to fault diagnosis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1158-1169.
    3. Yi Zhang & Peng Peng & Chongdang Liu & Yanyan Xu & Heming Zhang, 2022. "A sequential resampling approach for imbalanced batch process fault detection in semiconductor manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1057-1072, April.
    4. Rui Zhang & Na Zhao & Liuhu Fu & Xiaolu Bai & Jianghui Cai, 2023. "Recognizing defects in stainless steel welds based on multi-domain feature expression and self-optimization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1293-1309, March.
    5. Xie, Tianming & Xu, Qifa & Jiang, Cuixia & Lu, Shixiang & Wang, Xiangxiang, 2023. "The fault frequency priors fusion deep learning framework with application to fault diagnosis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 143-153.
    6. Wang, Zixuan & Qin, Bo & Sun, Haiyue & Zhang, Jian & Butala, Mark D. & Demartino, Cristoforo & Peng, Peng & Wang, Hongwei, 2023. "An imbalanced semi-supervised wind turbine blade icing detection method based on contrastive learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 251-262.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anatoly A. Peresetsky & Ruslan I. Yakubov, 2017. "Autocorrelation in an unobservable global trend: does it help to forecast market returns?," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1/2), pages 152-169.
    2. Kelly Burns & Imad Moosa, 2017. "Demystifying the Meese–Rogoff puzzle: structural breaks or measures of forecasting accuracy?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(48), pages 4897-4910, October.
    3. João C. Claudio & Katja Heinisch & Oliver Holtemöller, 2020. "Nowcasting East German GDP growth: a MIDAS approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 29-54, January.
    4. Antonio Rubia & Trino-Manuel Ñíguez, 2006. "Forecasting the conditional covariance matrix of a portfolio under long-run temporal dependence," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 439-458.
    5. Athanasopoulos, George & de Carvalho Guillén, Osmani Teixeira & Issler, João Victor & Vahid, Farshid, 2011. "Model selection, estimation and forecasting in VAR models with short-run and long-run restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 116-129, September.
    6. Hao Chen & Qiulan Wan & Yurong Wang, 2014. "Refined Diebold-Mariano Test Methods for the Evaluation of Wind Power Forecasting Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Antonello D’Agostino & Kieran Mcquinn & Karl Whelan, 2012. "Are Some Forecasters Really Better Than Others?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 715-732, June.
    8. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2009. "Nuisance parameters, composite likelihoods and a panel of GARCH models," Economics Papers 2009-W12, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    9. Christophe Chorro & Florian Ielpo & Benoît Sévi, 2017. "The contribution of jumps to forecasting the density of returns," Post-Print halshs-01442618, HAL.
    10. Carlo Altavilla & Paul De Grauwe, 2010. "Forecasting and combining competing models of exchange rate determination," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(27), pages 3455-3480.
    11. Matsumura, Marco & Moreira, Ajax & Vicente, José, 2011. "Forecasting the yield curve with linear factor models," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 237-243.
    12. Carlo Altavilla & Raffaella Giacomini & Giuseppe Ragusa, 2017. "Anchoring the yield curve using survey expectations," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 1055-1068, September.
    13. Gkillas, Konstantinos & Gupta, Rangan & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2020. "Forecasting realized oil-price volatility: The role of financial stress and asymmetric loss," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Vitek, Francis, 2006. "Measuring the Stance of Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach," MPRA Paper 802, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Grace Lee Ching Yap, 2020. "Optimal Filter Approximations for Latent Long Memory Stochastic Volatility," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 547-568, August.
    17. Xiaojie Xu, 2017. "The rolling causal structure between the Chinese stock index and futures," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 31(4), pages 491-509, November.
    18. Xilong Chen & Eric Ghysels, 2011. "News--Good or Bad--and Its Impact on Volatility Predictions over Multiple Horizons," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 46-81, October.
    19. Faria, Gonçalo & Verona, Fabio, 2023. "Forecast combination in the frequency domain," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 1/2023, Bank of Finland.
    20. Raggi, Davide & Bordignon, Silvano, 2012. "Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3730-3742.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-019-01522-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.