IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v240y2016i2d10.1007_s10479-014-1737-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplier development investment strategies: a game theoretic evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Chunguang Bai

    (Dongbei University of Finance and Economics)

  • Joseph Sarkis

    (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)

Abstract

Supplier development is a critical competitive endeavor for organizations and their supply chains. Investigation into this area has increased over the past few years, yet further understanding of suppler development is needed. Specifically, recent supplier development investment practices have shown a shift from standalone actions by organization or supplier to joint actions between organization and suppliers. Faced with this phenomenon, the goal of this paper is to develop a theoretic model based on the Cobb–Douglas production function. The study focuses on determining optimal supplier development investment strategies with respect to joint actions that increase supplier production capability for the benefit of both the focal organization and its suppliers. The supplier development investment strategies mainly refer to joint actions between an organization and multiple suppliers through capital resources (tangible) investments, knowledge (intangible) investments, and sharing cost of capital resources (tangible) investments. Using various game theoretic models, we reveal how supplier development investment strategies and profits of all the members are affected by various buyer-supplier relationships and investment returns to scale reasons. Whether the focal organization (buyer) has any incentives to share cost of capital resources (tangible) investments is also investigated. Our first finding is that supplier development investment activities motivation is derived from increases in supply volume for the “increasing returns to scale” situation, and derives from increasing the organization and suppliers’ marginal profit in the “decreasing returns to scale” situation. Secondly, the cooperative relationship is more economically beneficial to the supply chain, but it also requires more capital resources and knowledge expenditures (investments) than a non-cooperative relationship. Thirdly, through numerical analysis it is found that the cooperative relationship can not obtain Pareto efficiency for all the members of the supply chain when using the Nash bargaining model. Additional gaming insights and implications are also provided from parametric analysis. Opportunities for further research are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunguang Bai & Joseph Sarkis, 2016. "Supplier development investment strategies: a game theoretic evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 583-615, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:240:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-014-1737-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-014-1737-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-014-1737-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-014-1737-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Yue, Jinfeng & Austin, Jill & Wang, Min-Chiang & Huang, Zhimin, 2006. "Coordination of cooperative advertising in a two-level supply chain when manufacturer offers discount," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 65-85, January.
    3. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 94-113, January.
    4. Li, Wenli & Humphreys, Paul K. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2007. "The impact of specific supplier development efforts on buyer competitive advantage: an empirical model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 230-247, March.
    5. Markus Biehl & Wade Cook & David Johnston, 2006. "The efficiency of joint decision making in buyer-supplier relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 15-34, July.
    6. Humphreys, P. K. & Li, W. L. & Chan, L. Y., 2004. "The impact of supplier development on buyer-supplier performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 131-143, April.
    7. Elodie Adida & Georgia Perakis, 2014. "The effect of supplier capacity on the supply chain profit," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 1-52, December.
    8. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Robert Swinney & Gérard P. Cachon & Serguei Netessine, 2011. "Capacity Investment Timing by Start-ups and Established Firms in New Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 763-777, April.
    10. Ronald Coase, 2006. "The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 255-278, June.
    11. Feng Yang & Dexiang Wu & Liang Liang & Gongbing Bi & Desheng Wu, 2011. "Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 195-211, May.
    12. Dou, Yijie & Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph, 2014. "Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 420-431.
    13. Samaddar, Subhashish & Kadiyala, Savitha S., 2006. "An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 192-210, April.
    14. Patrick Rondé & Caroline Hussler, 2005. "Innovation in Regions : What Does Really Matter?," Post-Print hal-00279142, HAL.
    15. Eng, Shao Wei Lester & Chew, Ek Peng & Lee, Loo Hay, 2014. "Impacts of supplier knowledge sharing competences and production capacities on radical innovative product sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 41-51.
    16. Ronde, Patrick & Hussler, Caroline, 2005. "Innovation in regions: What does really matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1150-1172, October.
    17. Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-970, December.
    18. C-L Liu & S-L Chen, 2013. "Risk sharing in the supplier relations for the Taiwanese automotive industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(3), pages 365-371, March.
    19. Li, Susan X. & Huang, Zhimin & Zhu, Joe & Chau, Patrick Y. K., 2002. "Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 347-357, October.
    20. Sting, Fabian J. & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2010. "Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 725-735, December.
    21. Edward D. Reiskin & Allen L. White & Jill Kauffman Johnson & Thomas J. Votta, 1999. "Servicizing the Chemical Supply Chain," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 3(2‐3), pages 19-31, April.
    22. Kentaro Nobeoka & Jeffrey H Dyer & Anoop Madhok, 2002. "The Influence of Customer Scope on Supplier Learning and Performance in the Japanese Automobile Industry," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 33(4), pages 717-736, December.
    23. Li, Wenli & Humphreys, Paul K. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The impact of supplier development on buyer competitive advantage: A path analytic model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 353-366.
    24. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram & Chung, Wenming, 2010. "Manufacturer cooperation in supplier development under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 165-173, November.
    25. Huang, Zhimin & Li, Susan X., 2001. "Co-op advertising models in manufacturer-retailer supply chains: A game theory approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 527-544, December.
    26. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2010. "Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 252-264, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amirmohsen Golmohammadi & Alireza Tajbakhsh & Mohamed Dia & Pawoumodom M. Takouda, 2022. "Effect of timing on reliability improvement and ordering decisions in a decentralized assembly system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 159-192, May.
    2. Nayeli Hernandez-Martinez & Nevin Mutlu & Jan C. Fransoo, 2021. "Social equity in supplier–buyer relationships in smallholder agri-food supply chains," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1027-1089, December.
    3. Chun-Hung Chiu & Gang Hao & Xin Dai & Hang Xie, 2020. "Inventory sharing of professional optics product supply chain with equal power agents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 169-194, August.
    4. Da Liu & Shou-Kai Wang & Jin-Chen Liu & Han Huang & Xing-Ping Zhang & Yi Feng & Wei-Jun Wang, 2017. "Optimum Subsidy to Promote Electric Boiler Investment to Accommodate Wind Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Imre Dobos & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty, 2021. "Supplier selection: comparison of DEA models with additive and reciprocal data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 447-462, June.
    6. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Liu, Guanmei & Wang, Haijun & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Technology investments into a supplier with upstream entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 240-259.
    8. Qianqian Shi & Jianbo Zhu & Qian Li, 2018. "Cooperative Evolutionary Game and Applications in Construction Supplier Tendency," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, January.
    9. Chunguang Bai & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Diego Vazquez-Brust, 2021. "Sustainable buyer–supplier relationship capability development: a relational framework and visualization methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 1-34, September.
    10. Rongwu Lu & Xinhua Wang & Hao Yu & Dan Li, 2018. "Multiparty Evolutionary Game Model in Coal Mine Safety Management and Its Application," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, March.
    11. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan & Bourlakis, Michael & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2023. "A decision support system for selection and risk management of sustainability governance approaches in multi-tier supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Saghiri, Soroosh & Wilding, Richard, 2021. "On the effectiveness of supplier development programs: The role of supply-side moderators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Ismail Abdi Changalima & Ismail Juma Ismail & Alban Dismas Mchopa, 2021. "A review of the forms, rationale, and challenges of supplier development in public procurement: lessons for public buyers in Tanzania," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2010. "How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 87-108, August.
    3. Barra, Cristian & Zotti, Roberto, 2015. "Regional innovation system (in)efficiency and its determinants: an empirical evidence from Italian regions," MPRA Paper 67067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. repec:elg:eechap:14395_24 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Luigi Aldieri & Cristian Barra & Nazzareno Ruggiero & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2023. "Corruption and firms’ efficiency: international evidence using an instrumental variable approach," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 731-759, July.
    6. Cristian Barra & Roberto Zotti, 2018. "The contribution of university, private and public sector resources to Italian regional innovation system (in)efficiency," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 432-457, April.
    7. Proch, M. & Worthmann, K. & Schlüchtermann, J., 2017. "A negotiation-based algorithm to coordinate supplier development in decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 412-429.
    8. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2005. "The Role of Regional Knowledge for Innovation," ERSA conference papers ersa05p623, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2011. "Impacts and channels of university spillovers before the national innovation system reform in Japan," International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 383-393.
    10. Yu, Lili & He, Xiuli & Zhang, Juan & Xu, Chuanyong, 2021. "Horizontal cooperative advertising with advertising threshold effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Chen, Kebing & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2009. "Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 225-234, August.
    12. He, Yi & Wang, Hang & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Qingyun, 2019. "Coordination through cooperative advertising in a two-period consumer electronics supply chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 179-188.
    13. M A Krajewska & H Kopfer & G Laporte & S Ropke & G Zaccour, 2008. "Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1483-1491, November.
    14. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Li, Jicai & Zhong, Yuanguang, 2018. "Cooperative advertising and ordering policies in a two-echelon supply chain with risk-averse agents," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 97-117.
    15. Miguélez, Ernest & Moreno, Rosina, 2015. "Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 833-848.
    16. Xu, Xiaoyan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Guo, Shu, 2023. "Collaborative-commerce in supply chains: A review and classification of analytical models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    17. Gou, Qinglong & Shao, Jing & Wang, Xin & Yu, Lili, 2020. "Co-op supply chains with a local media company: Models and analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Gressgård, Leif Jarle & Hansen, Kåre, 2015. "Knowledge exchange and learning from failures in distributed environments: The role of contractor relationship management and work characteristics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 167-175.
    19. Hussler, Caroline & Ronde, Patrick, 2007. "The impact of cognitive communities on the diffusion of academic knowledge: Evidence from the networks of inventors of a French university," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 288-302, March.
    20. Der-Shiuan Lee & Breandán Ó Huallacháin, 2012. "Spatial Network-based and Regional Proximity in US Biotechnology," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Tavassoli, Sam & Karlsson, Charlie, 2021. "The role of location on complexity of firms’ innovation outcome," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:240:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-014-1737-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.