IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v28y1996i1p69-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multiple Criteria Location Problem: 2. Preference-Based Techniques and Interactive Decision Support

Author

Listed:
  • J Malczewski

    (Department of Geography, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5C2, Canada)

  • W Ogryczak

    (Department of Mathematics, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

This is the second of two papers in which multiple criteria location problems (MCLPs) are discussed. In this paper two major approaches to locational decisionmaking are overviewed: optimizing decision rules (utility-function-based methods) and satisficing decision rules (goal-programming methods). Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. From these two concepts a quasi-satisficing decision rule is developed and operationalized through a reference point method. A framework for an interactive decision support system (DSS) for tackling MCLPs is proposed. The system integrates a network model with the quasi-satisficing approach. It is argued that the DSS data and analytical components can be effectively integrated by means of the interactive decision support concept that involves a feedback exchange of information between a decisionmaker and a computer-based support system. This concept allows for the exploration of the locational decision problem and the alternative solutions both in decision space and in criterion outcome space.

Suggested Citation

  • J Malczewski & W Ogryczak, 1996. "The Multiple Criteria Location Problem: 2. Preference-Based Techniques and Interactive Decision Support," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(1), pages 69-98, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:1:p:69-98
    DOI: 10.1068/a280069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a280069
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a280069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon, Barry D. & Haynes, Kingsley E., 1984. "A survey and critique of multiobjective power plant siting decision rules," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 71-79.
    2. Marc J. Schniederjans & N. K. Kwak & Mark C. Helmer, 1982. "An Application of Goal Programming to Resolve a Site Location Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 65-72, June.
    3. Keeney, Ralph L. & Robilliard, Gordon A., 1977. "Assessing and evaluating environmental impacts at proposed nuclear power plant sites," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 153-166, June.
    4. Sinha, S. B. & Sastry, S. V. C., 1987. "A goal programming model for facility location planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 251-255.
    5. Min, Hokey, 1987. "A multiobjective retail service location model for fastfood restaurants," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 429-441.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malczewski, Jacek & Jackson, Marlene, 2000. "Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: an overview," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 219-235, September.
    2. Amin Akbari & Ronald Pelot & H. A. Eiselt, 2018. "A modular capacitated multi-objective model for locating maritime search and rescue vessels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 3-28, August.
    3. H. Murat Çelik & Ersin Türk, 2010. "Determination of Optimum Environmental Conservation: Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 479-499, March.
    4. Kayode J. Samuel, 2010. "Infrastructure Location," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 2(1), pages 71-90, June.
    5. David Kik & Matthias Gerhard Wichmann & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2022. "Decision support framework for the regional facility location and development planning problem," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 115-157, January.
    6. Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2010. "Conditional median as a robust solution concept for uncapacitated location problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 271-285, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cruz-Trinidad, A. (ed.), 1996. "Valuation of tropical coastal resources: theory and application of linear programming," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 11659, April.
    2. Juan Villegas & Fernando Palacios & Andrés Medaglia, 2006. "Solution methods for the bi-objective (cost-coverage) unconstrained facility location problem with an illustrative example," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 109-141, October.
    3. Ralph L. Keeney, 2002. "Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(6), pages 935-945, December.
    4. Badri, Masood A., 1996. "A two-stage multiobjective scheduling model for [faculty-course-time] assignments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 16-28, October.
    5. Rickard Bergqvist & Jonas Tornberg, 2000. "Locations for Intermodal Transport Terminals – How to go about evaluation?," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600011, EcoMod.
    6. Ralph L. Keeney & Robin S. Gregory, 2005. "Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Asadi, Meysam & Pourhossein, Kazem, 2021. "Wind farm site selection considering turbulence intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    9. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.
    10. Meysam Asadi & Kazem Pourhossein & Younes Noorollahi & Mousa Marzband & Gregorio Iglesias, 2023. "A New Decision Framework for Hybrid Solar and Wind Power Plant Site Selection Using Linear Regression Modeling Based on GIS-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Iida, Tetsuya & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2011. "Strategic multi-store opening under financial constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 379-389, April.
    12. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Kara, Bahar Y., 2019. "On multi-criteria chance-constrained capacitated single-source discrete facility location problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 107-122.
    13. McDaniels, Timothy L. & Trousdale, William, 2005. "Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 173-186, November.
    14. Asadi, Meysam & Ramezanzade, Mohsen & Pourhossein, Kazem, 2023. "A global evaluation model applied to wind power plant site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    15. Colebrook, Marcos & Sicilia, Joaquin, 2007. "A polynomial algorithm for the multicriteria cent-dian location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1008-1024, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:1:p:69-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.