IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rvr/journl/20119187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polanyi contre Freeman

Author

Listed:
  • Postel, Nicolas
  • Sobel, Richard

Abstract

L’approche dominante de la RSE est celle menée en termes de « parties prenantes » (R. E. Freeman). Davantage qu’une théorie, elle est un slogan qui irrigue autant le discours scientifique que les discours managérial et politique. On peut en faire deux lectures. La première, pour nous réductrice, est celle d’une déconstruction de l’entreprise comme institution et son remplacement par une forme de représentation marchande fondée sur des échanges bilatéraux entre individus rationnels. La seconde, plus prometteuse s’agissant d’identifier les potentialités de la RSE en termes de régulation du capitalisme, revient à armer la notion de partie prenante d’une théorie de l’acteur et de l’institution. C’est la position que nous défendons en mobilisant l’institutionnalisme de Karl Polanyi.

Suggested Citation

  • Postel, Nicolas & Sobel, Richard, 2011. "Polanyi contre Freeman," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    • Handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2011:9187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/9187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/9187
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Françoise Quairel & Michel Capron, 2004. "Mythes et réalités de l'entreprise responsable," Post-Print halshs-00150863, HAL.
    2. Richard Sobel & Nicolas Postel & Sandrine Rousseau, 2006. "La responsabilité sociale et environnementale des entreprises : une reconfiguration du rapport salarial fordiste ?," Post-Print halshs-00228094, HAL.
    3. Jacques Igalens, 2009. "Norme de responsabilité et responsabilité des normes: le cas d'ISO 26000," Post-Print halshs-00493400, HAL.
    4. Richard Sobel, 2008. "Le rapport salarial : impensé institutionnel de la Théorie de la justice de John Rawls ?," Post-Print halshs-00281911, HAL.
    5. François Eymard-Duvernay, 1989. "Conventions de qualité et formes de coordination," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 329-360.
    6. Nicolas Postel, 2003. "Les règles dans la pensée économique contemporaine," Post-Print halshs-00198272, HAL.
    7. Bodet, Catherine & Lamarche, Thomas, 2007. "La Responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme innovation institutionnelle. Une lecture régulationniste," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 1.
    8. Jérôme Maucourant, 2005. "Avez-vous lu Polanyi ?," Post-Print halshs-00174940, HAL.
    9. Olivier Favereau & Emmanuel Lazega (ed.), 2002. "Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2235.
    10. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    11. Nicolas Postel & Sandrine Rousseau & Richard Sobel, 2006. "La Responsabilité Sociale et Environnementale des Entreprises : une reconfiguration du rapport salarial fordiste ?," Post-Print halshs-00284021, HAL.
    12. Bertrand Zuindeau, 2007. "Régulation School and environment: Theoretical proposals and avenues of research," Post-Print halshs-00200674, HAL.
    13. Edward Freeman, R. & Evan, William M., 1990. "Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation," Journal of Behavioral Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 337-359.
    14. Sandrine Rousseau & Bertrand Zuindeau, 2007. "Théorie de la régulation et développement durable," Post-Print halshs-00284009, HAL.
    15. Héloïse Petit & François Michon, 2007. "Is the concept of labour market segmentation still accurate ?," Post-Print halshs-00267846, HAL.
    16. D. Cazal, 2008. "Parties prenantes et RSE : des enjeux sociopolitiques au-delà des contrats," Post-Print hal-00323835, HAL.
    17. Jean-Michel Servet, 1993. "L'institution monétaire de la société selon Karl Polanyi," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(6), pages 1127-1150.
    18. R. Freeman & Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2007. "Stakeholder Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 303-314, September.
    19. Eve Chiapello & Luc Boltanski, 1999. "Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme," Post-Print hal-00680085, HAL.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5180 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Richard Sobel, 2007. "Penser la marchandisation du monde avec Karl Polanyi," Post-Print halshs-00286277, HAL.
    22. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    23. Rousseau, Sandrine & Zuindeau, Bertrand, 2007. "Théorie de la régulation et développement durable," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Séhier, Clément, 2014. "La responsabilité sociale des entreprises dans l’industrie chinoise : une recomposition de la relation salariale ?," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cazal, Didier, 2011. "RSE et théorie des parties prenantes : les impasses du contrat," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    2. Bodet, Catherine & Lamarche, Thomas, 2007. "La Responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme innovation institutionnelle. Une lecture régulationniste," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 1.
    3. Chassagnon, Virgile & Dubrion, Benjamin, 2015. "Responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise et manipulation des salariés au travail : un éclairage institutionnaliste à partir d’une analyse de la littérature sur les codes de conduite," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 17.
    4. Ericka Costa & Tommaso Ramus, 2012. "The Italian Economia Aziendale and Catholic Social Teaching: How to Apply the Common Good Principle at the Managerial Level," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 103-116, March.
    5. Séhier, Clément, 2014. "La responsabilité sociale des entreprises dans l’industrie chinoise : une recomposition de la relation salariale ?," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 15.
    6. Krichewsky, Damien, 2011. "Crise et modalités d’élaboration d’un compromis social dans le nouveau capitalisme indien," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 9.
    7. Rousseau, Sandrine & Zuindeau, Bertrand, 2007. "Théorie de la régulation et développement durable," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 1.
    8. David Silver, 2012. "Citizens as Contractualist Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 3-13, August.
    9. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    10. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang, 2022. "An integrated theory of the firm approach to environmental, social and governance performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1567-1598, April.
    11. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    12. Andrew West, 2016. "Applying Metaethical and Normative Claims of Moral Relativism to (Shareholder and Stakeholder) Models of Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 199-215, May.
    13. Franck Aggeri & Aurélien Acquier, 2005. "La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-00645708, HAL.
    14. Beck, Donizete & Ferasso, Marcos, 2023. "How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    15. Diane Rodet, 2015. "Solidarity economy and its qualities: a sector s' diversity analysed using "quality devices" [L'économie solidaire et ses qualités : diversité d'un secteur analysé au regard de ses dispos," Working Papers halshs-02329772, HAL.
    16. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    17. Michal Zdziarski & Robert G. Boutilier, 2016. "Strategic Challenges in Stakeholder Networks (Strategiczne wyzwania w sieciach interesariuszy)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(64), pages 62-79.
    18. Anna Remišová & Anna Lašáková & Alexandra Bohinská, 2019. "Reasons of Unethical Business Practices in Slovakia: The Perspective of Non-Governmental Organizations' Representatives," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(2), pages 565-581.
    19. Catherine Bodet & Thomas Lamarche, 2011. "Discours RSE, la réalité sociale décalée "Du rapport de développement durable au rapport CHSCT : tension sur l'expertise sociale dans l'entreprise"," Working Papers halshs-00865044, HAL.
    20. Marc Orlitzky, 2017. "How Cognitive Neuroscience Informs a Subjectivist-Evolutionary Explanation of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(4), pages 717-732, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSR; Freeman; institution; Polanyi; stakeholders; Freeman; institution; parties prenantes; Polanyi; RSE; Freeman; institución; pares involucradas; Polanyi;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2011:9187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pascal Seppecher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://theorie-regulation.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.