IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v12y2002i03p331-349_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Freeman, R.
  • Phillips, Robert A.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that at least one strain of what has come to be called “stakeholder theory†has roots that are deeply libertarian. We begin by explicating both “stakeholder theory†and “libertarian arguments.†We show how there are libertarian arguments for both instrumental and normative stakeholder theory, and we construct a version of capitalism, called “stakeholder capitalism,†that builds on these libertarian ideas. We argue throughout that strong notions of “freedom†and “voluntary action†are the best possible underpinnings for stakeholder theory, and in doing so, seek to return “stakeholder theory†to its managerial and libertarian roots found in Freeman (1984).

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:12:y:2002:i:03:p:331-349_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00001883/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:12:y:2002:i:03:p:331-349_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.