IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1980_num_31_2_408528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Une interprétation de l'effet « Giffen »

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pascal Simonin

Abstract

[eng] The giffen effect ; an interpretation. After having recalled the definition and thé conventional analysis of the Giffen effect, the author shows that this effect can be the result of the determination of the consumer s behavior owing to his budget restraint and a survival frontier, irrelevant of his preferences. The conditions of creation of the Giffen effect are obtained duccessively in the cases of a linear and non linear survival frontier. It is showned that this analysis is compatible with the Marshallian conception of the Giffen effect and that it can be extended to the theory of the demand of goods depending upon their characteristics. [fre] Après avoir rappelé la définition et l'analyse traditionnelle de l'effet Giffen, l'auteur montre que ce dernier peut résulter de la détermination du comportement du consommateur par sa contrainte budgétaire et une frontière de survie indépendamment de ses préférences. Les conditions d'apparition de l'effet Giffen sont obtenues successivement dans les cas d'une frontière de survie linéaire et non linéaire. Il est montré que cette analyse est compatible avec la conception Marshallienne de l'effet Giffen et qu'elle peut être étendue à la théorie de la demande des biens en fonction de leurs caractéristiques.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pascal Simonin, 1980. "Une interprétation de l'effet « Giffen »," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 31(2), pages 347-362.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1980_num_31_2_408528
    DOI: 10.3406/reco.1980.408528
    Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1980.408528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/reco.1980.408528
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1980_num_31_2_408528
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/reco.1980.408528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard G. Lipsey & Gideon Rosenbluth, 1971. "A Contribution to the New Theory of Demand: A Rehabilitation of the Giffen Good," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 131-163, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Pascal Simonin, 1988. "Sur une conséquence paradoxale du paradoxe de Giffen. Application à la crise de la pomme de terre en Irlande au XIXe siècle," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(2), pages 391-404.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamara Todorova, 2004. "Quality Aspects of Economic Transition: The Effect of Inferior Quality on the Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 59-78.
    2. P. G. Reinhardt, 1976. "Stock-Flow Analysis in Consumption and Household Production Theory: A Review and Synthesis," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 112(I), pages 95-104, March.
    3. Kris De Jaegher, 2009. "Asymmetric Substitutability: Theory And Some Applications," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(4), pages 838-855, October.
    4. Somya Arora, 2021. "Why Are Downward-Sloping Demand Curves Unrealistic? A Critical Review of Factors Influencing Demand in More Realistic Scenario-I," Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), ISSN: 2348-7038, Voices of Inclusive Change and Expressions- (VOICE) Trust, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, October-D.
    5. Robert T. Jensen & Nolan H. Miller, 2007. "Giffen Behavior: Theory and Evidence," CID Working Papers 148, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    6. Philippe Mongin, 2006. "L'analytique et le synthétique en économie," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 72(4), pages 349-383.
    7. Alexander Pfaff & Shubham Chaudhuri & Howard Nye, 2004. "Household Production and Environmental Kuznets Curves – Examining the Desirability and Feasibility of Substitution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 27(2), pages 187-200, February.
    8. Manuel Besada & Javier García & Miguel Mirás & Carmen Vázquez, 2011. "Generalized marginal rate of substitution in multiconstraint consumer’s problems and their reciprocal expenditure problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 401-421, September.
    9. Somya Arora, 2022. "Why Are Downward-Sloping Demand Curves Unrealistic? A Critical Review of Factors Influencing Demand in More Realistic Scenario-II," Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), ISSN: 2348-7038, Voices of Inclusive Change and Expressions- (VOICE) Trust, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January-M.
    10. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent, 2008. "On the Development of an Ethical Demand Theory," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6236, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Michel Baroni & Fabrice Barthélémy & Francois des Rosiers, 2017. "Market heterogeneity and the determinants of Paris apartment prices: A quantile regression approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3260-3280, November.
    12. Lester Hadsell & Gerald T. Burke, 2007. "Computers, Learning Outcomes, and the Choices Facing Students," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 111-124, Winter.
    13. Zhu, Drew, 2016. "The Mechanism of Giffen Behaviour," MPRA Paper 75707, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jensen, Robert & Miller, Nolan, 2007. "Giffen Behavior: Theory and Evidence," Working Paper Series rwp07-030, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    15. Robert T. Jensen & Nolan H. Miller, 2007. "Giffen Behavior: Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 13243, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Dupoux, Marion & Martinet, Vincent, 2022. "Could the environment be a normal good for you and an inferior good for me? A theory of context-dependent substitutability and needs," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Stoll, John R., 1983. "Recreational Activities And Nonmarket Valuation: The Conceptualization Issue," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-7, December.
    18. Di Vita, Giuseppe, 2001. "Are the outputs derived from secondary materials giffen goods?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 255-260, December.
    19. Marek Hudík, 2011. "Rothbardian demand: A critique," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(3), pages 311-318, September.
    20. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Schnitz, Casey, 2008. "Consumers and the Evolution of New Markets: The Case of the Ethical Foods," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6752, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1980_num_31_2_408528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.