IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_244_1_4997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Éléments de définition d'une politique agricole commune pour le XXIe siècle [Promouvoir les rôles marchands et non marchands des agriculteurs européens ]

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Gohin
  • Hervé Guyomard
  • Chantai Le Mouël

Abstract

[eng] A common agricultural policy for the 21st century: promoting the market and non-market roles of european farmers . This paper proposes some changes to the Common Agricultural Policy from a long term perspective. Proposed changes are aimed at better establishing the double role of farmers : food producers on a world competitive basis on the one hand and stewards of the environment and the country side on the other hand. One shows that some general principles for public regulation and policy instrumentation in the euro- pean agricultural sector can be defined : a maximal decoupling of income support policies through direct aids which should be as neutral as possible with respect to farmers' production decisions and a maximal coupling of policies directed to reward farmers for the provision of positive externalities through direct aids tunely targeted and based on primary factors. [fre] Cet article propose certains aménagements possibles et souhaitables de la PAC dans une perspective de long terme où la double mission des agriculteurs européens doit être explicitement reconnue : un rôle "marchand" de fourniture de biens en grandes quantités sur des bases compétitives internationalement et un rôle "non marchand" de fourniture de biens mal valorisés par le marché. Il est possible de définir des principes communs de régulation publique et d'instrumentation pour l'agriculture communautaire : un découplage maximal des politiques de soutien au revenu via un système d'aides directes les plus indépendantes possibles des actes de production et un couplage maximal des politiques d'encouragement des fonctions publiques liées à l'activité agricole via un système d'aides ciblées assises sur les facteurs de production.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Chantai Le Mouël, 1998. "Éléments de définition d'une politique agricole commune pour le XXIe siècle [Promouvoir les rôles marchands et non marchands des agriculteurs européens ]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 244(1), pages 22-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_244_1_4997
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1998.4997
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.1998.4997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1998.4997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_244_1_4997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.1998.4997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Guyomard & Louis-Pascal Mahé, 1995. "La nouvelle instrumentation de la politique agricole commune," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 117(1), pages 15-29.
    2. Michael D. Helmar & William H. Meyers & Dermot J. Hayes, 1993. "GATT and CAP Reform: Different, Similar, or Redundant?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 93-gatt4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Barkaoui, A. & Butault, J. P. & Guyomard, H., 1997. "Mobilité des droits à produire dans l'Union européenne : Conséquences d'un marché des quotas laitiers à l'échelle régionale, nationale ou communautaire," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 44.
    4. Hervé Guyomard & Louis-Pascal Mahé, 1995. "Le GATT et la nouvelle Politique agricole commune : une réforme inachevée," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(3), pages 657-666.
    5. Josling, Timothy E. & Tangermann, Stefan, 1992. "MacSharry or Dunkel: Which Plan Reforms the CAP?," Working Papers 51121, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.
    2. L.P. Mahé, 1995. "La politique agricole commune sera-t-elle malthusienne ?," Post-Print hal-02279008, HAL.
    3. Chantal Le Mouël, 1999. "Élargissement à l'Est et négociations commerciales internationales : quelle marge de manœuvre pour la PAC ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 329(1), pages 35-54.
    4. Matthews, Alan, 1996. "The disappearing budget constraint on EU agricultural policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 497-508, December.
    5. Guyomard, Herve & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alexandre & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2000. "Impact of the 1996 US FAIR Act on the Common Agricultural Policy in the World Trade Organisation context: the decoupling issue," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-34, February.
    6. Witzke, Heinz Peter & Heckelei, Thomas, 2002. "Eu Sugar Policy Reform: Quota Reduction And Devaluation," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19807, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 1996. "CAP response to the 1996 US FAIR Act," Post-Print hal-01593995, HAL.
    8. Witzke, H.P., 2002. "Umfassende oder eng fokussierte Liberalisierung? Schlussfolgerungen aus Simulationsrechnungen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    9. Westhoff, Patrick C. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Beghin, John C. & Meyers, William H., 2004. "Challenges in Modeling the Effects of Trade Agreements on the Agricultural Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(2), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Catherine C. Benjamin & Herve Guyomard, 1997. "Production rights market : some analysis problems [Quelques difficultés d'analyse d'un marché des droits à produire]," Post-Print hal-02840513, HAL.
    11. Giardini, Giovanni, 1992. "The reform of the agricultural policy in the European Economic Community: an Italian farm simulation study," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017587, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Rod Tyers, 1993. "The Cairns Group and the Uruguay Round of International Trade Negotiations," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 26(1), pages 49-60, January.
    13. Tim Josling, 1994. "La réforme de la PAC et son importance pour les pays industrialisés," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 223(1), pages 27-31.
    14. Tim Josling, 1993. "Agricultural Trade Issues in Transatlantic Trade Relations," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 553-573, September.
    15. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 1993. "EG-Agrarreform und GATT-Vereinbarungen: Vom Leistungseinkommen zur Quasi-Rente," Kiel Discussion Papers 217, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Catherine Benjamin & Magalie Houée Bigot, 2006. "The impact on yields of arable crops of moving from price support to area payements: A Study of the 1992 CAP Reform: n° 423," Post-Print hal-01931561, HAL.
    17. Weyerbrock, Silvia, 1998. "Reform of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy: How to reach GATT-compatibility?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 375-411, February.
    18. Philippe Le Goffe & . European Grassland Federation, 2002. "Should we promote grassland ? A microeconomic analysis," Post-Print hal-02306183, HAL.
    19. Scoppola, Margherita, 1995. "Multinationals and agricultural policy in the EC and USA," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1998_num_244_1_4997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.