IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jmarka/v7y2019i2d10.1057_s41270-019-00049-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scale for testing of knowledge on the effective marketing research processes: multiple-group confirmatory (MGCFA) and multiple indicators-multiple causes (MIMIC) approach

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Tarka

    (Poznan University of Economics and Business)

Abstract

This paper has two main objectives. The first contributes to the development of marketing theory by proposing a measurement instrument, allowing for the testing of knowledge on the effective marketing research processes, while the second focuses on the verification of that knowledge across two groups: managers and researchers in business organizations from the perspective of a two-community theory of management. In particular, the level of compliance between information-users and information-producers on their knowledge of these processes is investigated. With these objectives in mind, theoretical assumptions of the effective marketing research processes from the methodological perspective are discussed. Next, methodological problems appearing in marketing research processes are characterized. Further discussion speaks about a need for stronger integrity of researchers and managers on the basis of methodological knowledge of effective research processes in order to enhance these processes and improve activities related to planning marketing strategies and decision-making. Finally, when comparing that knowledge on the basis of the empirical study conducted, we implemented the following analytical strategies based on Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) and Multiple Indicators-Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model in reference to a sample 391 of respondents working in multinational companies in a European country (Poland). The results confirmed the psychometric quality of the developed scale of testing knowledge on effective marketing research processes, but also revealed that managers and researchers share slightly different points of view on the effective marketing research processes. Managers exhibit an even greater level of instability than researchers when evaluating these processes, while their insufficient knowledge is due to a lack of conviction that marketing research can be effective in general. Moreover, managers assume that marketing research and research information does not always play a significant role in the activities related to planning marketing strategies and decision-making. Our findings also have practical implications for organizations that wish to improve their internal information policy and make the marketing research more effective with equal engagement of both groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Tarka, 2019. "A scale for testing of knowledge on the effective marketing research processes: multiple-group confirmatory (MGCFA) and multiple indicators-multiple causes (MIMIC) approach," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 94-121, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:7:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1057_s41270-019-00049-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41270-019-00049-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-019-00049-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41270-019-00049-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Nirmalya & Scheer, Lisa & Kotler, Philip, 2000. "From market driven to market driving," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 129-142, April.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. William Meredith, 1993. "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 525-543, December.
    4. N. Lesca & M.-L. Caron-Fasan & S. Falcy, 2012. "How Managers Interpret Scanning Information," Post-Print halshs-00783659, HAL.
    5. James P. Walsh, 1995. "Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 280-321, June.
    6. Wilton, Peter C & Myers, John G, 1986. "Task, Expectancy, and Information Assessment Effects in Information Utilization Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(4), pages 469-486, March.
    7. Tamara Keszey, 2015. "The Role of Market Researchers in Managerial Use of Market Research Information," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 43-56.
    8. Bellenger, Danny N., 1979. "The marketing manager's view of Marketing research," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 59-65, June.
    9. Lee, Hanjoon & Lindquist, Jay D. & Acito, Frank, 1997. "Managers' evaluation of research design and its impact on the use of research: An experimental approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 231-240, July.
    10. T. Keszey, 2011. "How market information is transformed into marketing knowledge?," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 61(3), pages 313-336, September.
    11. James M. Malcomson, 2011. "Do Managers with Limited Liability Take More Risky Decisions? An Information Acquisition Model," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 83-120, March.
    12. Davis, Donna F. & Golicic, Susan L. & Boerstler, Courtney N. & Choi, Sunny & Oh, Hanmo, 2013. "Does marketing research suffer from methods myopia?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1245-1250.
    13. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Gerry McNamara, 2001. "Controlling Decision-Making Practice in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 484-501, August.
    14. Andrea Wilson, 2014. "Bounded Memory and Biases in Information Processing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82, pages 2257-2294, November.
    15. C. W. Churchman & A. H. Schainblatt, 1965. "The Researcher and The Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 69-87, February.
    16. Jackson, Thomas W. & Farzaneh, Pourya, 2012. "Theory-based model of factors affecting information overload," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 523-532.
    17. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    18. G. Tomas M. Hult & Forrest V. Morgeson & Neil A. Morgan & Sunil Mithas & Claes Fornell, 2017. "Do managers know what their customers think and why?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 37-54, January.
    19. Cui, Annie Peng & Hu, Michael Y. & Griffith, David A., 2014. "What makes a brand manager effective?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 144-150.
    20. N. Lesca & M.-L. Caron-Fasan, 2012. "How managers interpret scanning information?," Post-Print halshs-00740495, HAL.
    21. Guo, Chiquan, 2004. "Marketing research: Cui bono?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 33-38.
    22. Wierenga, Berend, 2011. "Managerial decision making in marketing: The next research frontier," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 89-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Tarka & Elżbieta Jędrych, 2023. "Toward an exploratory framework of determinants of marketing research effectiveness in business organizations," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 503-522, September.
    2. Dyego Carlos Souza Anacleto de Araújo & Sylmara Nayara Pereira & Willian Melo dos Santos & Pedro Wlisses dos Santos Menezes & Kérilin Stancine dos Santos Rocha & Sabrina Cerqueira-Santos & André Faro , 2021. "Brazilian version of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation among healthcare students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Orcos, Raquel & Pérez-Aradros, Beatriz & Blind, Knut, 2018. "Why does the diffusion of environmental management standards differ across countries? The role of formal and informal institutions in the adoption of ISO 14001," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 850-861.
    5. Román, Francisco J. & Morillo, Daniel & Estrada, Eduardo & Escorial, Sergio & Karama, Sherif & Colom, Roberto, 2018. "Brain-intelligence relationships across childhood and adolescence: A latent-variable approach," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 21-29.
    6. Gary Kleinman & Dan Palmon & Picheng Lee, 2003. "The Effects of Personal and Group Level Factors on the Outcomes of Simulated Auditor and Client Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 57-84, January.
    7. Brashear, Thomas G. & Brooks, Charles M. & Boles, James S., 2004. "Distributive and procedural justice in a sales force context: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 86-93, January.
    8. Eric Tremolada Álvarez (editor), 2013. "Repensando la integración y las integraciones," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, edition 1, volume 1, number 85, August.
    9. Lisa D. Wijsen & Denny Borsboom & Tiago Cabaço & Willem J. Heiser, 2019. "An Academic Genealogy of Psychometric Society Presidents," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 562-588, June.
    10. Goichi Hagiwara & Kayoko Kurita & Shinichi Warisawa & Satori Hachisuka & Jim Ueda & Kensuke Ehara & Katsuhiko Ishikawa & Kosei Inoue & Daisuke Akiyama & Masakatsu Nakada & Masafumi Fujii, 2022. "Competencies That Japanese Collegiate Sports Coaches Require for Dual-Career Support for Student Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Jeanne A. Teresi & Katja Ocepek-Welikson & John A. Toner & Marjorie Kleinman & Mildred Ramirez & Joseph P. Eimicke & Barry J. Gurland & Albert Siu, 2017. "Methodological Issues in Measuring Subjective Well-Being and Quality-of-Life: Applications to Assessment of Affect in Older, Chronically and Cognitively Impaired, Ethnically Diverse Groups Using the F," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 251-288, June.
    12. Héctor Duarte-Félix & Jorge Zamarripa & Raúl Baños & Manuel de la Cruz-Ortega & Maritza Delgado-Herrada, 2020. "Psychometric Properties of the Interpersonal Styles Questionnaire for Physical Education in a Mexican Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-11, September.
    13. E. Cools & H. Van Den Broeck & D. Bouckenooghe, 2006. "The Cognitive Style Indicator: Development and validation of a new measurement instrument," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/379, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Tamara Keszey, 2015. "The Role of Market Researchers in Managerial Use of Market Research Information," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 43-56.
    15. Beverly B. Tyler & Devi R. Gnyawali, 2009. "Managerial Collective Cognitions: An Examination of Similarities and Differences of Cultural Orientations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 93-126, January.
    16. Godfred O Boateng & Shalean M Collins & Patrick Mbullo & Pauline Wekesa & Maricianah Onono & Torsten B Neilands & Sera L Young, 2018. "A novel household water insecurity scale: Procedures and psychometric analysis among postpartum women in western Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Xuenan Ju & Yuan Cheng & Zuohao Hu & Mengyuan Lv & Xi Chen, 2015. "Determinants and consequences of price-leadership strategy: Evidence from Chinese manufacturer exporters," Transnational Marketing Journal, Oxbridge Publishing House, UK, vol. 3(2), pages 81-111, October.
    18. Pedersen Geir & Johansen Merete Selsbakk & Wilberg Theresa & Karterud Sigmund, 2014. "Testing Different Versions of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales in a Clinical Sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Eggers, Fabian & Niemand, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Breier, Matthias, 2020. "Developing a scale for entrepreneurial marketing: Revealing its inner frame and prediction of performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 72-82.
    20. Margaret Penning & Guiping Liu & Pak Chou, 2014. "Measuring Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The UCLA and de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 1147-1166, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:7:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1057_s41270-019-00049-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.