IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v45y2019i6p1194-1212..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Curiosity Tempts Indulgence

Author

Listed:
  • Kyra L Wiggin
  • Martin Reimann
  • Shailendra P Jain
  • Darren W Dahl
  • Margaret C Campbell
  • Paul M Herr

Abstract

Given curiosity’s characterization as a motivational drive for knowledge, prior research has primarily focused on curiosity’s positive effects on knowledge exploration, information acquisition, and learning. Once the desired knowledge has been acquired, curiosity is said to be satisfied. But what happens if curiosity is left unsatisfied? Across five experiments, spanning four domains of indulgence-related decisions and relying on different methods of curiosity elicitation, the present research sheds light on an unexpected yet crucial consequence of curiosity—that unsatisfied curiosity tempts indulgent consumption in domains unrelated to the source of the curiosity. This effect is explained by a generalized desire for rewards. Experiments 1–3 establish and replicate the proposed mediation model of curiosity —› desire for rewards —› indulgence, employing manipulation-of-process, moderation-of-process, and measurement-of-process experimental designs. Experiment 4 utilizes neurophysiological data to indicate brain activation in the insular cortex for unsatisfied (vs. satisfied) curiosity. Experiment 5 addresses the role of cognitive depletion as a possible alternative mechanism. In summary, this article demonstrates that the hunger for information that accompanies unsatisfied curiosity is converted into a generalized desire for rewards, which in turn tempts indulgence.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyra L Wiggin & Martin Reimann & Shailendra P Jain & Darren W Dahl & Margaret C Campbell & Paul M Herr, 2019. "Curiosity Tempts Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1194-1212.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:45:y:2019:i:6:p:1194-1212.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucy055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodore J. Noseworthy & Fabrizio Di Muro & Kyle B. Murray, 2014. "The Role of Arousal in Congruity-Based Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 1108-1126.
    2. Yih Hwai Lee & Cheng Qiu, 2009. "When Uncertainty Brings Pleasure: The Role of Prospect Imageability and Mental Imagery," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 624-633, December.
    3. Loewenstein, George, 1996. "Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 272-292, March.
    4. Ali Faraji-Rad & Michel Tuan Pham, 2017. "Uncertainty Increases the Reliance on Affect in Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 1-21.
    5. Theodore J. Noseworthy & Fabrizio Di Muro & Kyle B. Murray, 2014. "The Role of Arousal in Congruity-Based Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 1108-1126.
    6. Martin Reimann & Deborah J. MacInnis & Valerie S. Folkes & Arianna Uhalde & Gratiana Pol, 2018. "Insights into the Experience of Brand Betrayal: From What People Say and What the Brain Reveals," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(2), pages 240-254.
    7. Hristina Dzhogleva & Cait Poynor Lamberton, 2014. "Should Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Understanding Self-Control Decisions in Dyads," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 361-380.
    8. Carolyn Yoon & Angela H. Gutchess & Fred Feinberg & Thad A. Polk, 2006. "A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Neural Dissociations between Brand and Person Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 31-40, June.
    9. Maner, Jon K. & Gerend, Mary A., 2007. "Motivationally selective risk judgments: Do fear and curiosity boost the boons or the banes?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 256-267, July.
    10. Bechara, Antoine & Damasio, Antonio R., 2005. "The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 336-372, August.
    11. Martin Reimann & Deborah MacInnis & Antoine Bechara, 2016. "Can Smaller Meals Make You Happy? Behavioral, Neurophysiological, and Psychological Insights into Motivating Smaller Portion Choice," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 71-91.
    12. Alexander Fedorikhin & Vanessa M. Patrick, 2010. "Positive Mood and Resistance to Temptation: The Interfering Influence of Elevated Arousal," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(4), pages 698-711, December.
    13. David Gal, 2012. "A Mouth-Watering Prospect: Salivation to Material Reward," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1022-1029.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Wenjing & Hardesty, David M. & Craig, Adam W. & Song, Lei, 2022. "Hidden price promotions: Could retailer price promotions backfire?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Thompson, Phillip S. & Klotz, Anthony C., 2022. "Led by curiosity and responding with voice: The influence of leader displays of curiosity and leader gender on follower reactions of psychological safety and voice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Toteva, Irina T. & Lutz, Richard J. & Shaw, Eric H., 2021. "The curious case of productivity orientation: The influence of advertising stimuli on affect and preference for subscription boxes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Anne Hamby & Cristel Russell, 2022. "How does ambivalence affect young consumers’ response to risky products?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 841-863, July.
    5. Jia, Yanli & Wyer, Robert S., 2022. "The effect of control deprivation on consumers’ adoption of no-pain, no-gain principle," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 678-698.
    6. Schweitzer, Vera M. & Gerpott, Fabiola H. & Rivkin, Wladislaw & Stollberger, Jakob, 2023. "(Don’t) mind the gap? Information gaps compound curiosity yet also feed frustration at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam, Marc T.P. & Astor, Philipp J. & Krämer, Jan, 2016. "Affective Images, Emotion Regulation and Bidding Behavior: An Experiment on the Influence of Competition and Community Emotions in Internet Auctions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 56-69.
    2. Wen, Xiaohan (Hannah) & Kim, Shinhye & Bowen, Melanie, 2023. "Doing good by sharing messages: An investigation of “You Share, We Donate” campaigns and how they can attain viral success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Darren W Dahl & Eileen Fischer & Gita V Johar & Vicki G Morwitz, 2017. "Making Sense from (Apparent) Senselessness: The JCR Lens," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 719-723.
    4. Halkin Andrii, 2020. "Assessing the Utility of Retailer Based on Generalized Costs of End-Consumers," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 31-42, January.
    5. Gao, Xin & De Hooge, Ilona E. & Fischer, Arnout R.H., 2022. "Something underneath? Using a within-subjects design to examine schema congruity theory at an individual level," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Bach, Norbert & Sterner, Madlen, 2011. "Implikationen neuroökonomischer Erkenntnisse für das Employer Branding [Implications of neuroeconomic findings for Employer Branding]," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 5, number 52011.
    7. Philp, Matthew & Mantonakis, Antonia, 2020. "Guiding the consumer evaluation process and the probability of order-effects-in-choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 13-22.
    8. Anne Hamby & Cristel Russell, 2022. "How does ambivalence affect young consumers’ response to risky products?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 841-863, July.
    9. Chun-Tuan Chang & Xing-Yu (Marcos) Chu, 2020. "The give and take of cause-related marketing: purchasing cause-related products licenses consumer indulgence," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 203-221, March.
    10. Ethan Pancer & Lindsay McShane & Theodore J. Noseworthy, 2017. "Isolated Environmental Cues and Product Efficacy Penalties: The Color Green and Eco-labels," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 159-177, June.
    11. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Biraglia, Alessandro, 2021. "How less congruent new products drive brand engagement: The role of curiosity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 13-24.
    12. Dean C. H. Wilkie & Lester W. Johnson & Wynne W. Chin, 2018. "Does the type of attribute matter? Examining whether underlying factors explain product attribute preference," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 305-321, July.
    13. Das, Gopal & Wiener, Hillary J.D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2019. "To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-156.
    14. Polman, Evan & Ruttan, Rachel L. & Peck, Joann, 2022. "Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Bambauer-Sachse, Silke & Heinzle, Priska, 2018. "Comparative advertising for goods versus services: Effects of different types of product attributes through consumer reactance and activation on consumer response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 82-90.
    16. Guitart, Ivan A. & Hervet, Guillaume, 2017. "The impact of contextual television ads on online conversions: An application in the insurance industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 480-498.
    17. Shin, Eonyou & Lee, Jung Eun, 2021. "What makes consumers purchase apparel products through social shopping services that social media fashion influencers have worn?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 416-428.
    18. Aleksandra Kovacheva & Hristina Nikolova, 2024. "Uncertainty marketing tactics: An overview and a unifying framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Theodore J Noseworthy & Kyle B Murray & Fabrizio Di Muro & Gita JoharEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2018. "When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Using Conjunctive Enablers to Enhance Evaluations for Extremely Incongruent New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1379-1396.
    20. Frans van Winden & Mirre Stallen & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2008. "On the Nature, Modeling, and Neural Bases of Social Ties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-063/1, Tinbergen Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:45:y:2019:i:6:p:1194-1212.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.