IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijrema/v39y2022i3p678-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of control deprivation on consumers’ adoption of no-pain, no-gain principle

Author

Listed:
  • Jia, Yanli
  • Wyer, Robert S.

Abstract

Consumers often base their judgments on a no-pain, no-gain principle—that is, one must pay a cost in order to achieve a beneficial outcome. For example, they infer the quality of a product from its price and judge a bad-tasting medicine to be more effective than a tasty one. Although the use of this principle to infer the value of a product or service has been observed in several domains, the processes that underlie its use have not been fully explored. We find that when people feel out of control, they tend to use the principle because it exemplifies a causal relationship between actions and outcomes and endorsing it reaffirms their belief that they have control over the outcomes of their behavior. Our findings have implications for how marketers might position products and services to attract consumers who perceive themselves as having different levels of control.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia, Yanli & Wyer, Robert S., 2022. "The effect of control deprivation on consumers’ adoption of no-pain, no-gain principle," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 678-698.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:678-698
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811621001154
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyra L Wiggin & Martin Reimann & Shailendra P Jain & Darren W Dahl & Margaret C Campbell & Paul M Herr, 2019. "Curiosity Tempts Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1194-1212.
    2. Robert Cummins, 2000. "Personal Income and Subjective Well-being: A Review," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 133-158, June.
    3. Soo Kim & David Gal, 2014. "From Compensatory Consumption to Adaptive Consumption: The Role of Self-Acceptance in Resolving Self-Deficits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 526-542.
    4. Keisha M. Cutright & Adriana Samper, 2014. "Doing It the Hard Way: How Low Control Drives Preferences for High-Effort Products and Services," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 730-745.
    5. Drazen Prelec & George Loewenstein, 1998. "The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-28.
    6. Noah VanBergen & Juliano Laran, 2016. "Loss of Control and Self-Regulation: The Role of Childhood Lessons," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 534-548.
    7. Dhar, Ravi & Nowlis, Stephen M, 1999. "The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(4), pages 369-384, March.
    8. Silvia Bellezza & Neeru Paharia & Anat Keinan, 2017. "Conspicuous Consumption of Time: When Busyness and Lack of Leisure Time Become a Status Symbol," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 118-138.
    9. Thomas Kramer & Caglar Irmak & Lauren Block & Veronika Ilyuk, 2012. "The effect of a no-pain, no-gain lay theory on product efficacy perceptions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 517-529, September.
    10. Michael A. Kamins & Valerie S. Folkes & Alexander Fedorikhin, 2009. "Promotional Bundles and Consumers' Price Judgments: When the Best Things in Life Are Not Free," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(4), pages 660-670, December.
    11. Young Eun Huh & Joachim Vosgerau & Carey K. Morewedge, 2014. "Social Defaults: Observed Choices Become Choice Defaults," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 746-760.
    12. Peluso, Alessandro M. & Bonezzi, Andrea & De Angelis, Matteo & Rucker, Derek D., 2017. "Compensatory word of mouth: Advice as a device to restore control," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 499-515.
    13. Rao, Akshay R & Monroe, Kent B, 1988. "The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 253-264, September.
    14. Keisha M. Cutright, 2012. "The Beauty of Boundaries: When and Why We Seek Structure in Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(5), pages 775-790.
    15. Suri, Rajneesh & Monroe, Kent B, 2003. "The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers' Judgments of Prices and Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(1), pages 92-104, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cervi, Cleber & Brei, Vinicius Andrade, 2022. "Choice deferral: The interaction effects of visual boundaries and consumer knowledge," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Wen, Na & Lurie, Nicholas H., 2019. "More Than Aesthetic: Visual Boundaries and Perceived Variety," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 86-98.
    3. Kim, Jungkeun & Kim, Jae-Eun & Marshall, Roger, 2020. "Choose Quickly! The Influence of Cognitive Resource Availability on the Preference between the Intuitive and Externally Recommended Options," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 263-272.
    4. Kukar-Kinney, Monika & Ridgway, Nancy M. & Monroe, Kent B., 2012. "The Role of Price in the Behavior and Purchase Decisions of Compulsive Buyers," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 63-71.
    5. Ashok K. Lalwani & Lura Forcum, 2016. "Does a Dollar Get You a Dollar’s Worth of Merchandise? The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Price-Quality Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 317-333.
    6. Kohei Kawaguchi & Kosuke Uetake & Yasutora Watanabe, 2019. "Effectiveness of Product Recommendations Under Time and Crowd Pressures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 253-273, March.
    7. Ding, Min & Ross, William T. & Rao, Vithala R., 2010. "Price as an Indicator of Quality: Implications for Utility and Demand Functions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 69-84.
    8. Jeanne Lallement & Monique Zollinger, 2013. "« Vite et à tout prix ? » ou l'importance du prix pour le consommateur pressé," Post-Print hal-01675117, HAL.
    9. Tatzel, Miriam, 2002. ""Money worlds" and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 103-126, February.
    10. Miriam Tatzel, 2003. "The Art of Buying: Coming to Terms with Money and Materialism," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 405-435, December.
    11. Suri, Rajneesh & Cai, Jane Zhen & Monroe, Kent B. & Thakor, Mrugank V., 2012. "Retailers’ Merchandise Organization and Price Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 168-179.
    12. Joško Brakus, J. & Schmitt, Bernd H. & Zhang, Shi, 2014. "Experiential product attributes and preferences for new products: The role of processing fluency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2291-2298.
    13. Kwanho Suk & Jieun Koo, 2022. "Preference for playing order in games with and without replacement: Motivational biases and probability misestimations," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 17(2), pages 237-262, March.
    14. Joshua T Beck & Ryan Rahinel & Alexander Bleier & Simona Botti & Darren W Dahl & J Jeffrey Inman, 2020. "Company Worth Keeping: Personal Control and Preferences for Brand Leaders [Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 871-886.
    15. Baek, Tae Hyun & Yoon, Sukki, 2020. "Looking forward, looking back: The impact of goal progress and time urgency on consumer responses to mobile reward apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Xianghua Lu & Sulin Ba & Lihua Huang & Yue Feng, 2013. "Promotional Marketing or Word-of-Mouth? Evidence from Online Restaurant Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 596-612, September.
    17. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:237-262 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. De Maeyer, Peter & Estelami, Hooman, 2011. "Consumer perceptions of third party product quality ratings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1067-1073, October.
    19. Ahmetoglu, Gorkan & Furnham, Adrian & Fagan, Patrick, 2014. "Pricing practices: A critical review of their effects on consumer perceptions and behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 696-707.
    20. Peluso, Alessandro M. & Bonezzi, Andrea & De Angelis, Matteo & Rucker, Derek D., 2017. "Compensatory word of mouth: Advice as a device to restore control," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 499-515.
    21. Krishnan, Balaji C. & Dutta, Sujay & Jha, Subhash, 2013. "Effectiveness of Exaggerated Advertised Reference Prices: The Role of Decision Time Pressure," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 105-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijrema:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:678-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-research-in-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.