Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Contemporary Relevance and Ongoing Controversies Related to the CES Production Function

Contents:

Author Info

  • T.V.S.Ramamohan Rao

    ()
    (Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The CES specification has been an important watershed in the development of the production function and its applications over the past fifty years. While the original formulation and estimation were rooted in sound economic theory many issues have been unresolved. In particular, the economic sources of the elasticity of substitution and the meaning of the ``returns to scale'' parameter remained ambiguous. Similarly, the efficient method of estimating the elasticity of substitution is as yet not clear. The primary reason is that several proposed methods of estimating the non-linear CES function did not pay attention to the economic decision processes underlying the observed choices from which estimation begins. Despite these shortcomings substitution and its applications have been so important that a whole lot of applications have been conceptualized. Several important insights have been recorded from the empirical work. However, it was found that the elasticity of substitution concept must be supplemented, or supplanted altogether, by several other explanations, equally rooted in economic theory and well documented empirical regularities, to provide a complete understanding of empirical phenomena. We may need many more years to finally decide which of the developments are worthwhile and which ones deserve discarding. It may take another genius of the stature of Minhas to steer the research out its current turbulence.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.jqe.co.in/journals/JQE_v9_n2_2011_p3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by The Indian Econometric Society in its journal Journal of Quantitative Economics.

    Volume (Year): 9 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 2 (July)
    Pages: 36-57

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:jqe:jqenew:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:36-57

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.jqe.co.in/societyhome.html
    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information:
    Postal: Managing Editor, Journal of Quantitative Economics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Gen. A.K. Vaidya Marg, Goregaon (E), Mumbai 400 065 , INDIA
    Web: http://www.jqe.co.in/

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Andreas Irmen, 2010. "Steady-State Growth and the Elasticity of Substitution," CREA Discussion Paper Series 10-21, Center for Research in Economic Analysis, University of Luxembourg.
    2. Juillard, Michel & Villemot, Sébastien, 2011. "Multi-country real business cycle models: Accuracy tests and test bench," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 178-185, February.
    3. S K Mishra, 2010. "A Brief History of Production Functions," The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(4), pages 6-34, November.
    4. Dupuy, Arnaud & de Grip, Andries, 2006. "Elasticity of substitution and productivity, capital and skill intensity differences across firms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 340-347, March.
    5. Hippu Salk Kristle Nathan & Srijit Mishra, 2010. "Progress in human development: Are we on the right path?," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 199-221.
    6. Shekhar Aiyar & Carl-Johan Dalgaard, 2008. "Accounting for Productivity: Is it OK to Assume that the World is Cobb-Douglas?," Discussion Papers 08-14, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    7. Montoro Carlos, 2007. "Oil Shocks and Optimal Monetary Policy," Working Papers 2007-010, Banco Central de Reserva del Perú.
    8. Timothy J. Richards & Stephen F. Hamilton, 2006. "Rivalry in Price and Variety among Supermarket Retailers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(3), pages 710-726.
    9. Winston W. Chang, 2012. "Monopolistic Competition And Product Diversity: Review And Extension," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 879-910, December.
    10. Söderbom, Måns & Weng, Qian, 2012. "Multi-product firms, product mix changes and upgrading: Evidence from China's state-owned forest areas," Working Papers in Economics 525, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    11. Sun, Kai & Henderson, Daniel J. & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2010. "Biases in approximating log production," MPRA Paper 27527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Antony, Jürgen, 2009. "A dual elasticity of substitution production function with an application to cross-country inequality," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 10-12, January.
    13. Thompson, Henry, 2011. "Estimating the Heckscher-Ohlin model: Inverting the inverse matrix," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 185-192, April.
    14. Bréchet, Thierry & Lambrecht, Stéphane, 2011. "Renewable resource and capital with a joy-of-giving resource bequest motive," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 981-994.
    15. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Yan, An, 2004. "A theory of corporate spin-offs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 259-290, May.
    16. Ari Hyytinen & Mika Maliranta, 2008. "When Do Employees Leave Their Job for Entrepreneurship?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(1), pages 1-21, 03.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jqe:jqenew:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:36-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (D. M. Nachane) or ().

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.